Army Intel Analyst Targeted For Suggesting New 9/11 Investigation..

[Postman]

http://www.rawstory.com/showoutarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lonestaricon.com%2Fabsolutenm%2Fanmviewer.asp%3Fa%3D426%26z%3D54

Army: Doubting Official 9/11 Story Is ‘Disloyal To The United States’

SFC Buswell, You're a great American !!!

[MadMaddie]

1. And when they have nothing else left they attack their own

soldiars who have been loyal to them....there is going to be a backlash....like we have never seen in this country...because like Vietnam it will become more obvious to the soldiars that still believe this administration was rightious in taking them to Iraq...that they are there based on lies...and their buddies have died for rich men to get richer.....

[valerief]

2. Poor guy. They'll string him up for a Thoughtcrime, and after

risking his life for those thieves.

[Name removed]

3. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[AntiFascist]

4. K&R, is it a crime to question the criminals who are now in power? n/t

[JohnyCanuck]

5. He is getting lots of support according to the feedback comments

to the story at the Lone Star Iconoclast's web site.

Click on the yellow stars at the bottom of the article at the Lone Star Iconoclast to read the feeback or to leave a comment of your own.

[IChing]

6. HIS Words:

Getting back to the F4...The Pentagon isn’t a nuclear hardened structure, so I can’t follow your weak logic that since an F4 vaporized itself in a test impact on a nuclear hardened structure that the alleged 757 hitting the Pentagon should have exhibited the same characteristics!

I say Occums razor is the best way to deduce this ‘day of infamy’; if you weigh all options, do some simple studying you will see 911 was clearly not executed by some arabs in caves with cell phones and 3 day old newspapers! I mean how are Arabs benefiting from pulling off 911? They have more war, more death and dismal conditions, so, how did 911 benefit them? Answer: It didn’t. So, who benefited from 9-11? The answer is sad, but simple; The Military Industial Complex.

It’s not a paranoid conspiracy to think there are conspiracies out there...and, it’s not Liberal Lunacy either, nor is it Conservative Kookiness! People, fellow citizens we’ve been had! We must demand a new independent investigation into 911 and look at all options of that day, and all plausabilities , even the most incredulous theories must be examined.

nominated

[Supersedeas]

14. when sounding like Ike makes you disloyal to Def Contractor 'Merica

[nashville_brook]

16. "who benefits?" -- in THIS culture, THAT is our most important

question. because you all know... everything is for sale. everything is being bought and sold. it's all about WHO BENEFITS.

to ask "who benefits" is to engage in the finest intellectual tradition; to see past happy faces and convenient lies.

to ask "who benefits" doesn't earn you any friends. more likely, you'll be alienated.

but, there is NO OTHER question, really. if you can't ask "who benefits" then you might as well pack it in. go home. because you are being gamed.

[EVDebs]

29. Keep asking questions...

Dollars of terror
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17730

""Ptech is used primarily to develop enterprise blueprints at the highest level of US government and corporate infrastructure. These blueprints hold every important functional, operational, and technical detail of the enterprise. A secondary use of this powerful tool is to build other smart tools in a short period of time. Ptech’s clients in 2001 included the Department of Justice, the Department of Energy, Customs, Air Force, the White House, the FAA, IBM, Sysco, Aetna, and Motorola, to name just a few. ""

FAA huh ? WhiteHouse huh ? looks like the Dubai Ports scandal was peanuts compared to this. BTW, are they STILL at FAA (remember wargames on 9-11...) and the WH ?

[slay]

7. So seeking the truth is now an act of disloyalty?

He never said for sure our government did it - he said there needed to be a new investigation. I agree 100%! Nominated.

[Rex]

8. As a former army intel analyst, I call for a new 9/11 investigation.

SFC must not drink the kool-aid.

[JohnyCanuck]

9. Kick n/t

[QuettaKid]

10. KICKED and RECOMMENDED ! ! !

amazing how the very next day, the wheels were in motion to discredit and disgrace him.

[Twist_U_Up]

11. Join the crowd......The nazis dont like Truth Seekers. nt

[QuettaKid]

12. read the comments of support

there are LOTS of them.

[JackRiddler]

13. K&R

thanks

[nashville_brook]

15. everyone who has questioned the myth of 911 has felt this

...in a way, it's oddly comforting that the military is "going after" such mindcrimes.

it's overt and it's not just the military that pursues mindcrimes... perception equals reality... doncha fergi chit.

[EVDebs]

21. Loose change is going to be the big draw on Sept 11, 2006

http://www.loosechange911.com/

Viewable on the web 2nd edition. I've heard that thousands of copies are going to be distributed in NYC around Ground Zero. I'm reminded of the ending of V ...

[Joanne98]

26. It's number nine on Google's most 100 popular video's.

RATE IT UP!

[Az_lefty]

17. this is starting to sound like the old KGB Political Officers...

nothing this SFC said was disloyal to the US.

[EVDebs]

22. Lt Col Steve Butler's quote. He's in good company

"We simply cannot ignore the fact that elements of the US government at the highest levels may have committed treason and mass murder by purposely allowing 9/11 to happen."

Lt. Col. Steve Butler, vice chancellor for student affairs at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California -- a US military facility that one or more of the hijackers reportedly attended during the 1990s.

http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2005/09/1719459.php

BTW, they ended Butler's career without a court martial since Butler could have had a trial that exposed the facts of 9-11. DoD couldn't risk that. They will have to do same for this poor unfortunate Sgt 1st Class who has the balls enough to challenge orders when necessary. Hoo Raa.

Related treason at high levels info posted here re Chalabi and Bushco's role
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1968853&mesg_id=1969100

If they want a show trial, SFC, GIVE THEM ONE.

[EVDebs]

18. Apparently he knows about the book Triple Cross

and even Fitz's role in the cover up...Soon we'll all know.

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/40693/

[QuettaKid]

20. they always claim it's negligence that

allows these terrorists to get away with operating right under the eyes and ears of the FBI, CIA, whoever. It's not negligence. Far from it. Watch Munich, if you haven't seen it yet.

[farmbo]

19. SFC Buswell's right...the Freeper made a bogus, invalid comparison

Comparison of a McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom (as used in the Freeper's email) and the Boeing 737 (plane which struck the Pentagon?):

1.wingspan: F-4= 38'5"; 737= 117'5"
2.loaded weight: F-4= 17,900lbs; 737= 154,500lbs (about 10X heavier)
3.tail height: F-4= 16'; 737= 41'2"

The much smaller, lighter F-4 fighter jet would naturally vaporize when it struck a hardened, reinforced, poured-concrete barrier.

No scientifically- significant comparison whatsoever can be made between the Freeper's F-4 crash and a collision between a lumbering, wide bodied 737 passenger liner and a brick- construction, sixty year old building.

A Tomahawk cruise missile, on the other hand...

:eyes:

[wildbilln864]

23. kicked...

and recommended!

Thet Truth Shall Set us Free!

[YankeyMCC]

24. So Disloyal to Military Industrial Complex = Disloyal to US

By the reasoning here that is what the people investigating this man are saying.

This I think is an unintentional blatant admission of the state of affairs in our leadership and who's interest they really are working to protect.

[Subdivisions]

25. This article would imply that there may not

have been an airliner in the Pentagon and Shanksville locations. Refresh my memory. Weren't their eyewitnesses in both cases that saw these planes crash with their own two eyes?

[EVDebs]

28. You haven't seen Loose Change. So do yourself a favor...

first see it and then repost...

[indepat]

27. The number complicit is implicit by what they say, do or don't say, do