Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Take action: Help force the MSM to be fair. It worked on Chuck Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeBunk Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:49 AM
Original message
Take action: Help force the MSM to be fair. It worked on Chuck Roberts
Chuck Roberts Apologizes For Calling Lamont The ‘Al Qaeda Candidate’

Roberts apologized because thousands of us called and emailed CNN. The pressure got high and he backed down. Now we have another MSM parrot who needs a lesson in how to do his job.

John Kerry has Showdown with Reporter, Hits Raw Nerve that Reporter Reveals to Bloggers After Conference Call

Chuck Roberts heard our voices. Let's make sure Kaplan hears them too.

Contact Jonathan Kaplan and tell him what you think:

Phone: (202) 628-8529
jkaplan@thehill.com


http://bunkport.blogspot.com/2006/08/take-action-help-force-msm-to-be-fair.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I emailed the guy
and got a message back saying that he is out of the office until Aug. 22, at the earliest. Says he's trying to stay away from mail as well. Hmmm...maybe a bit of cowardice because he knows he's wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeBunk Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too and he replied. Here is the reply
Thanks for your thought. I hope you read The Hill and can judge for yourself.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.

I shot back:

I'm a long time subscriber. I've been interested in politics my whole life.

I have never witnessed a climate like this. A climate where talking points
are printed without fact checking.

I don't mean to single you out, but I think your comments about who's
"fault" it is are unfounded.

Thanks for the reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeBunk Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. bump
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC