Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ARG: Lieberman and Lamont Tied in Connecticut

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:49 AM
Original message
ARG: Lieberman and Lamont Tied in Connecticut
Lieberman and Lamont Tied in Connecticut

Joe Lieberman and Ned Lamont are in a statistical tie in the race for United States Senate in Connecticut according to the latest survey from the American Research Group. Among likely voters in November, 44% say they would vote for Lieberman, 42% say they would vote for Lamont, 3% say they would vote for Alan Schlesinger, and 11% are undecided.

Lieberman leads Lamont 57% to 18% among enrolled Republicans and 48% to 38% among unaffiliated (independent) voters. Lamont leads Lieberman 65% to 30% among enrolled Democrats.

A total of 56% of likely voters have a favorable opinion of Lieberman and 41% have an unfavorable opinion of Lieberman. A total of 47% of likely voters have a favorable opinion of Lamont and 34% have an unfavorable opinion of Lamont.

http://americanresearchgroup.com/ctsenate/

also see:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1959277&mesg_id=1959277
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lamont will win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. He will n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. I've been expecting this.
With due respect to his overall good voting record, Joe has little to run on. He's pro-Iraq war, and opposition to it is at an all time high. He's correctly seen as being too cozy with Junior & Darth Cheney, whose unpopularity is causing Republican candidates to distance themselves from them. And the Republicans' rush to support Lieberman in mostly Democratic Connecticut is the kiss of death.

As we get closer to the general election these issues will continue to work against Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. That was quick.
More of that joementum in evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wasn't it? His Democratic support is evaporating fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, this is two polls so far
that have the race tightening. Lamont just needs a little more of the Indies and a little more of the Dems and Lieberman is done. And it's still August!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. My my my... the 'fringe' seems to be growing!!
Proud Fringe Voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Two months to go and this race is already looking good for Lamont
If this trend to Lamont continues joe is going to be bawling like a spoiled republican baby on election night. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Joe's raising Ned's profile
Lamont was largely unknown outside Democratic circles during the primary, until it looked like Joe might lose. Since then, Joe, the GOP, and the media have nationalized the election, effectively nationalizing Ned's visibility. It appears that people are liking what they see as they become familiar with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. He has grown more polished since the debate
he seems to be very comfortable in the spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. I can't wait to see Lieberman lose big as an Independent.
I want to see that whiney shithead call 60% of his former constituents the "far left fringe".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. I second your sentiment
I almost want Lieberman to stay-in until election day so we can watch Lamont and the "radical left" very publicly kick Joe's ass a second time. Fuck you Joe, you've squandered your opportunity to bow-out with a modicum of your dignity intact; and the longer you remain in the race, the more it'll hurt in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Borgnine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. What happened?
A second ago, Lieberman had a massive lead. Now I've blinked and his Joementum has run dry.

Was there any baby eating involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Close
Karl Rove got involved.

It was amazing how quickly the Republican talking points came out on Lamont & Lieberman's primary - all were some form of:

1) The Looney Left elitist fringe "Wackadoos" had taken over the Democratic primary.
2) It was a victory for Al-Qaeda.
3) and, lamenting the loss of Lieberman.

I don't think CT residents took kindly to being called "wackadoos" - I've been monitoring the LTTEs in the local newspapers, and they have been strongly anti-Lieberman.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Very foolish on Lieberman's part.
But I hope he keeps doing it! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. That Was Too Quick
I hope these polls are accurate, because I just don't know what to believe...

Eeeyore... I know. GO LAMONT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Those pajama people must be breeding in their basements!
It is the only possible explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Whew, I am glad it is closer, but Lamont still has to attract more
Independents. I am not as worried about the Democratic base there because with the Re pubs pushing Lieberman, Lamont must look more and more appealing to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. great. Time for Joe to get boot in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. TOON: Fax to any Dems that support or don't condemn Lieberman
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 11:19 AM by yurbud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. Schlesinger, you can DOOOO it!!!
C'mon man! Work it! Only 50+ points to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
35. Tell Republicans that they shouldn't vote for "immigration amnesty"...
which they've voted against in so many other campaigns. Those hard core Republicans should be told to vote their principles and vote with Schlesinger on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. 30% of Democrats now for Joe ?
That would mean he has lost about 18% of his Democratic support from the primary? That's bad news for Joe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I agree
Lamont's support has gone up 13 among Democrats, while Lieberman has lost 18.

I hope those numbers improve even more for September - say 75-20?

Then, if we can pull a bit more of the independents, we'll be in great shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. Just sit right back .....
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 10:42 AM by Botany


Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale,
a tale of a fateful kiss.
That started from bush's mouth,
given to a tiny shit.
Joe was a kiss ass little man,
the President drunk for sure.
All Democrats blew chunks that day,
Joe is a whore for sure, Joe is a whore for sure………
Then people started getting pissed,
in Connecticut Joe was tossed.
If not for the support of Karl and the press crew,
the Joe would have been lost; the Joe would have been lost.
The Joe's ship took ground on the shore of this neo con isle,
with Karl, the President too,
the republican Millionaires, and their trophy wives,
the Hannity, the Bill O'Rielly and Blitzer,
here on Neo Con Isle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Great song!
LOL

"Joe is a whore for sure, Joe is a whore for sure………"

Hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Suggestion: Instead of "the Joe would have been lost"...
... try "Joementum would be lost".

Sounds alright to my ears, how bout yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. exactly!
joementum would be lost!

www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<-=-=- top shop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
22. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
I'd be happier if the sample were a little bigger and the margin of error a little smaller, but it's good to know that the media's anti-Lamont media offensive after the primary didn't stick. This is gap we can close!

:woohoo:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
localroger Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Wow, check out the favorable/unfavorables
Lieberman has nowhere to go; 3% undecided. Everybody knows him. Lamont has nowhere to go but UP -- 19% undecided. If I was Joe I'd be looking for another gig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. Usually undecideds break for the challenger...
I think these numbers reflect that. Most folks have already decided wether they like or dislike Lieberman. They are holding out their decision now to see if they want to vote for Lamont yet. I'm guessing a lot will, given his less "unfavorable" status. Keeping my fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. Diebold machines?
Anyone know if Connecticut uses them? With a double digit undecided # it almost sounds too easy for the Repugs if they will have access to the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. No diebold in CT...
We used lever machines in the primary and starting this November some towns will convert to optical scan machines made by a company in Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. The Republican mighty wurlitzer..
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 11:08 AM by sendero
... is running out of steam. I think more and more Americans are figuring out that the "news" is a sham and the pundits a bunch of wackjobs every day that goes by.

Just how big a dumbass do these Rovian-speak people think Americans are? When they say stuff that is the verbal equavilent of "Lamont is for the terrorists" - do they really think folks are going to go along with that bullshit?

Coming up next: Americans have decided that they are not going to tailor their lives around terra-terra-terra any more!

I'm going to enjoy the death of the Republican party's power and the death of the last vestiges of respect for TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. one again we see that more people get to know Joe
the less they like him.

Truly his campaign continues to be a marvel of ineptitude - his decision to paint Lamont voters as terrorist sympathizers followed by his playing race card ("vote for Lamont and Negroes will take your jobs and still be on welfare at the same time") THEN saying that Rumsfeld should resign and trying to paint himself as a * critic (yeah right), combined with his enormous sense of aggrieved entitlement and obvious resentment at having to curry the unwashed's favor is making this a case study for anyone interested in politics in what not to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
64. And NOW
that the race is tightening, let's see what desperate, idiotic thing Joe does next! Given the incredible partisanship created by Rove and co., it will be more difficult for Joe to demonstrate how he has been bipartisan and not an enabler. We can list many things that Joe did to enable Bush, but what can Joe (or his allies) state to demonstrate that Joe encouraged Bush to deviate from his "my way or the highway" persona? Someone needs to publicly challenge Joe to demonstrate how he has actually worked across the aisle and not just enabled a rogue administration. If he is going to get any undecideds, he will have to pull this off. Seeing that he can't, he will get desperate and say or do something so stupid that the new mantra will be "whose ca ca"? (not that we want massa Allen to get off the hook for being a complete and utter dick, mind you)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
31. Wasn't he supposed to move to the right before that happened?
Moving right didn't work for Lieberman and it won't work for Lamont either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
33. Just shows that Chicken Little "The sky is falling" stuff...
...isn't what its all cracked up to be.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. It's Lieberman, people.
He had a huge poll advantage in the Democratic presidential primary and he blew it. He had a huge advantage in the recent primary, and he blew it.

And it looks like it's going to happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. I agree. He is letting people see him sweat
He looks as panicked as Bush does. I think there may be a connection there.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
37. That's real bad news for Joe
A tie now means he couldn't leave Lamont in the dust by appealing to voters as a whole. The Dem lead for Lamont is pretty convincing, and those are the motivated voters who will actually show up. I doubt the independent love for Joe is either strong or deep...without a compelling race outside this one, a lot of non-Dems will just stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
38. Escalating Iraq civil war is no help for Lieberman... Lamont will defeat
by a much larger number in second go-round of voting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Me thinks you're correct
and Bush's announcement yesterday to the effect "we're staying in Iraq for as long as I'm the president" - is only gonna help highlight the Iraq War as THE issue for voters, especially in Connecticut, come November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. Lieberman is doing slightly better still with "always" voters
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 11:43 AM by demdiva
this means a targeted GOTV effort is going to be really important ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
40. I think more needs to be done to put Schlesinger in this race.
If he gained a bit of publicity he might be capable of stripping a few points off of Lieberman. I don't think I can hold my nose hard enough to donate to a republican campaign though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. Schlesinger is not going anywhere so that's a waste of energy
He is a joke in this state. I'd love to see him strip votes away from Joe but it ain't gonna happen. the repubs see their chance with good ole Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. It's that Nader factor
Even a few points could make the difference in a race this tight.

Every vote Schlesinger gets is a vote taken away from Lieberman. I hope Sclesinger does really well in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Yeah, I get that. But these repubs in CT aren't that dumb
Besides, who needs a republican when you can get Joe? Also, Schlesinger is a schmuck. Nader had some appeal and real fire in his belly. "Wampum card" Al is almost a cardboard cutout character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. I'm sure you are right about Schlesinger
But he does seem to have 3 - 4% of the vote despite there being no comparison between him and Nader on quality. Even that margin could be useful if the race remains close (not that it necessarily will).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Yep, we just can't devote time and energy to him
I'm hoping that NEd will have a really hard hitting campaign come September and we volunteers will be involved in something really interesting on the phones or whatever. I really don't care what they want me to do: I'll affix stamps, fold and stuff mailers, etc. It doesn't matter. I just want to elect Senator Lamont. Hey, I like the sound of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bretttido Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
41. Great news, made my day. GO NED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
44. Unless Lamont is leading by 10%+, they will find a way to steal it....
Ohio, Florida, Nevada, New Mexicao, Georgia, Nebraska, and numerous other States have shown that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
45. Excellent news!
Thank you for posting it!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
46. Ned Lamont is a Monster Killer. He's going to win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
48. What's with that 30% of enrolled Democrats?
Gotta get them to see Lieberman as NOT a Democrat any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. I have hope, I truly do, that some of these Dems supporting Joe will
turn in sorrow away from Joe at the end of the day. Some of them live in my neighborhood (and Joe's former neighborhood) in New Haven. They are intelligent, nice people (I know because I went door to door to get signatures to put Ned on the ballot here). I can't believe that all of them are inured to Ned's arguments. I think some of them were hurt by Joe's primary loss and maybe took it personally. I hope they heal and start listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. Didn't Bush throw his weight behind Lieberman recently?
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 01:11 PM by KansDem
Didn't His Royal Flatulence endorse Joementum?

Looks like the Bush "kiss of death" strikes again!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
50. Let's not get cocky
It's still over two months until Election Day.

We've got to work hard and harder to GOTV for Ned.

Once Rove and his henchmen start attacking Ned, anything can happen.

BTW, the Kissmobile will be out there in full force!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Yup. I'm just back from vacation and ready to start calling for Ned again
or whatever they want me to do.

I just wish Ned could get more exposure. To see him and hear him is to really like the guy. I'd love to see him on Oprah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. The campaign
really gets into full-swing after Labor Day.

I'm sure we'll be seeing a lot of him then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. good now it is heading in the right direction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
52. How can we give Schlesinger a boost?
I'm sure he can poll more than 3% of the Repugs...

Any additional votes he gets come right off the top of Lieberman's pile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
56. Interesting
And Lamont has a good shot really. Independent or unaffiliated voters are less likely to vote with someone that is close to the Republicans. Lieberman will either have to clearly and obviously distance himself from them (and thereby lose the tenative Republican support), continue to cling to them (goodbye independents), or play it safe and continue the moderate thing.

He will probably choose the middle ground. This means he will be campaigning almost entirely in platitudes and soundbites in an effort to market himself to the broadest possible spectrum of voters. Voters desperate for clear choices and definitive stands will be turned off by this. With any amount of luck this will put an end to the irrational and undefined "go-for-the-moderates" run that has become so popular over the years.

He will obviously lose the anti-Iraq war vote which does include some Republicans. They will either vote their party or stay home depending on what form the endorsed Republican candidates goes. With the amount of positive support by the Republican machine devoted to pumping up Liberman he will feel a pressure to do something out of the ordinary. The fact that he seems to have had a gambling problem creates difficulties for a standard republican 'slime-the-oppostion' values campaign.

I think Schlessinger might actually decide to run against the standard Republican line on the war. It might include soundbites like: "fixing the problem" or "getting it right or getting get out." He will intentionally sound like a non-establishment candidate. Of course most of this will be smoke, mirrors, and spin. He will probably "stand up" to Bush and might even manage to get John McCain to stop in town. The local op-ed repub's will make a big deal out of how he "proudly" stands away from Bush on this matter.

Of course this is all just idle speculation, but I personally think that the "support" for Liberman will slowly die off amongst the right wing as soon as they are sure the media is carrying it on their own.

I still think Lamont has an excellent chance at winning in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
61. Keep it up, Joe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JRob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
65. Saw Lieberman on CNN today. He sounded more Republican than usual...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkb Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
66. Knowing More Is Best Way Forward For Politically Involved
     Sorry if I erred about considering Lieberman because he
might have been a stronger general election candidate.  It
seems that he might win anyway.
     It seems that in hindsight, Lamont was the best choice,
considering Republicans are ditching Schlesinger for
Lieberman.  This opinion was due mostly to my desire to
GENERALLY support Democrats against Republicans and the fact I
am not as aware of the conditions in Connecticut as many
others.  My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyDiaper Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-23-06 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
67. *, Pull the Def Sec trigger TODAY!
Lieberman's numbers will only get worse, and the most recent call for Bummy's head was an (R).

There will be no better time.

/poundspodium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC