Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush - No 9-11/Iraq connection suggested

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:09 AM
Original message
Bush - No 9-11/Iraq connection suggested
"Nobody's ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attacks." -- Bush | August 21 Press Conference

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0425,schanberg,54517,6.html
June 22nd, 2004
Bush added, "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda."

-- September 14, 2003 Meet The Press http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3080244/

"We learn more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s," Cheney said, "that it involved training, for example, on , that Al Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems."

"We know that many of the attackers were Saudi. There was also an Egyptian in the bunch. It doesn’t mean those governments had anything to do with that attack. That’s a different proposition than saying the Iraqi government and the Iraqi intelligent service has a relationship with al-Qaeda that developed throughout the decade of the ’90s. That was clearly official policy. "

"If we're successful in Iraq, if we can stand up a good representative government in Iraq, that secures the region so that it never again becomes a threat to its neighbors or to the United States, so it's not pursuing weapons of mass destruction, so that it's not a safe haven for terrorists, now we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9-11."

The Nation: December 18, 2002 :http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030106/bergen

Directly after the 9/11 attacks, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, the chief architect of the Administration's get-tough policy on Iraq, told the cabinet, "There was a 10 to 50 per cent chance Saddam was involved ."

Six days after the attacks President Bush told his Cabinet, "I believe that Iraq was involved, but I'm not going to strike them now."

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has said that there is "bullet-proof" evidence of links between the terrorist group and the Iraqi regime.

--------

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=37549

Cheney: "His regime has had high-level contacts with al Qaeda going back a decade and has provided training to al Qaeda terrorists." (Cheney Remarks, 12/2/02)

Cheney: "His regime aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. He could decide secretly to provide weapons of mass destruction to terrorists for use against us." (Cheney Remarks, 1/30/03)

Cheney: "I think there's overwhelming evidence that there was a connection between al-Qaeda and the Iraqi government." (National Public Radio, "Morning Edition," 1/22/04)

Cheney: "There's been enormous confusion over the Iraq and al-Qaeda connection, Gloria. First of all, on the question of--of whether or not there was any kind of a relationship, there was a relationship. It's been testified to. The evidence is overwhelming. It goes back to the early '90s...There's clearly been a relationship." (CNBC "Capital Report," 6/17/04)

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0425,schanberg,54517,6.html
June 22nd, 2004
Bush added, "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. They've lied so many times none of them can keep it straight (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. They suggested the fuck out of it.
I actually remember it, although millions seem to have not noticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. The #1 rule to being a good liar is keeping your lies straight.
Man, he even fucks that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Since when has he NEEDED to be a good liar?
Poppy's pals will cover for him, just like always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I just don't get how anybody can fall for his shit.
I hate it when I'm talking to what seems to be an intelligent person and then once the war comes into conversation, they start spouting off a new Shrub talking point for everyone I refute. Finally, they just end up with something like "ARGHGRAH! Saddam was bad. BLAHDHF!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. He can't answer the question w/o bringing up the old lies.
When he was called on it, he had to make up more lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Any asshat who voted for this tool (and still supports him) needs to
be forced to watch clips of what Bush has done "Clockwork Orange"-style.

I just get so pissed off whenever the pResident speaks. I can't even stand it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exlrrp Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Why he gets away with it
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 08:45 AM by exlrrp
Having a bought off media in your pocket means you never have to say your'e sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. They lie then lie about their lies.
Soon they will lie about lying about their lies and on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Tuesday toon - worth printing out
go here - http://radfringe.tripod.com/radicalfringecartoons/
click on the first cartoon (opens a new browser window) and print away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. he DID still make the connection:
Edited on Tue Aug-22-06 07:00 AM by ima_sinnic
not to mention again, in the same specious ball of wax, Hussein "paying suiciders," his "relations with Zarqawi" (yeah, like his "relations with Osama bin Laden," right?), his "capacity to make WMDs," the IGNORAMUS "freedom agenda," and "threats" that were NEVER MADE.

. . . imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who would -- who had relations with Zarqawi. Imagine what the world would be like with him in power. The idea is to try to help change the Middle East.

Now, look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was -- the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question -- my answer to your question is, is that, imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.

You know, I've heard this theory about everything was just fine until we arrived, and kind of "we're going to stir up the hornet's nest" theory. It just doesn't hold water, as far as I'm concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

Q What did Iraq have to do with that?

THE PRESIDENT: What did Iraq have to do with what?

Q The attack on the World Trade Center?

THE PRESIDENT: Nothing, except for it's part of -- and nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a -- the lesson of September the 11th is, take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody has ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq. I have suggested, however, that resentment and the lack of hope create the breeding grounds for terrorists who are willing to use suiciders to kill to achieve an objective. I have made that case.

And one way to defeat that -- defeat resentment is with hope. And the best way to do hope is through a form of government. Now, I said going into Iraq that we've got to take these threats seriously before they fully materialize. . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Back at Harvard, his teacher reminisces:
Bush, he recalled, "made this ridiculous statement and when I asked him to explain, he said, 'The government doesn't have to help poor people -- because they are lazy.' I said, 'Well, could you explain that assumption?' Not only could he not explain it, he started backtracking on it, saying, 'No, I didn't say that.'"
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/09/16/tsurumi/index_np.html?pn=1
least we blame his personal faults too much on his strategists....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. the whole article is excellent & worth widespread reading
this prof spotted his character flaws way back when,as i'm sure others have but have not come forward.

his meanness, vindictiveness, and shallowness of character are part and parcel of his very DNA.

i quote this article as often as i can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. extreme parsing of language
"Nobody's ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attacks." -- Bush | August 21 Press Conference


this is true. they never suggested that 'saddam hussein' 'ordered' the attacks.

and noone ever said they did.

of course they said all that other stuff that people have noted but they dont answer for that. its all very clever and very devious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. He only linked the two
every chance he had by speaking of one and then in the next sentence the other.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. ...and now they're LYING about LYING!
Lies piled atop of lies. Jeeeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-22-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. He is telling the truth. What's the big deal. No one ever
suggested or implied a connection between Iraq and 9/11.


They weren't nearly that subtle.

They flat-out said it, plain and clear as day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC