Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JUDGE THROWS OUT TERROR CHARGE IN PADILLA CASE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:30 PM
Original message
JUDGE THROWS OUT TERROR CHARGE IN PADILLA CASE
Judge throws out terror charge in Padilla case
BY JAY WEAVER

The U.S. government's high-profile terror case against Jose Padilla and two other Muslims has suffered another serious setback as their Miami trial looms in January.

U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke threw out the first count in the indictment -- that the threesome conspired to murder, kidnap and maim persons in a foreign country -- saying it repeated the main alleged ''conspiracy to advance violent jihad'' in two other charges.

''There can be no question that the government has charged a single conspiracy offense multiple times, in separate counts, when in law and in fact, only one crime has been committed,'' Cooke wrote in an eight-page ruling released to prosecutors and defense lawyers on Monday.

''The danger raised by a multiplicitous indictment is present in the instant indictment,'' she wrote, stressing that it violates the ''double jeopardy'' clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution -- the prosecution or punishment of a defendant twice for the same offense.


more at:
http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/news/nation/15326427.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. whoa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Is she black and appointed by Carter?" That's the first question
Edited on Mon Aug-21-06 02:34 PM by berni_mccoy
The repukes will ask... just wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Appointed by Little Lord Pissypants!
BWAHAHAHA! How are they going to SPIN that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:42 PM
Original message
A prescient blog entry from last November about the judge
http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2005/11/marcia-cooke-in-spotlight.html

I've received a bunch of emails from out-of-towners asking about Judge Cooke, the newest judge in this District, and drawing interest because she is the judge assigned to Jose Padilla's case. One of the comments asks whether the government was "judge-shopping" and others like Prof. Froomkin have flat out said that the government specifically selected Judge Cooke by adding Padilla to a superceding indictment. Perhaps DOJ looked at Judge Cooke's resume and saw that she was a Bush appointee and a former AUSA and thought that she would be a push-over for the feds. Froomkin (who I doubt has ever appeared before her) goes so far as to say "the government should not expect a hostile bench." If this is what the government thought, it is dead wrong. Judge Cooke -- to put it in Chief Justice Roberts' words -- calls a strike a strike and a ball a ball, and will not be pushed around by the government. She is known in this community as a fair judge who listens carefully to both sides and calls it right down the middle. She is well liked by criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks for the biography. The Gov't is definitely Judge shopping!
And once again doing a sloppy job at it.

Poor widdle Cheney ain't getting his cake and eat it too.

The poor sap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larrysh Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Good....another innocent victim of a phony attack on the WTC
And Dem candidates in the upcoming election need to start pounding into
voter's heads that the attack on the WTC was engineered by our own government.....Osama is an actor, there is no war on terror!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unda cova brutha Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. She is black, appointed by Chimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. LOL!
One of the Bush's judges that they threw tantrums to get appointed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. berni_mccoy, well you got one out of two....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. just wow. This has been a difficult week for baby bushie.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. and it's only MONDAY!!
:rofl:

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Heh. It looks like it's time for a another vacation.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I DID read in
The Orange County Register that he was going to Kennebunkport this coming weekend. Phase 3 of his vacation?

Someone hide the Segways. heh heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. And hide the stairs, door frames and pretzels.
If he wasn't such an asshole, he would be just pathetic. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. damn activist judges - always following
that 'damn old piece of paper'.

Another woman steps up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. 5...4...3...2...1 counting for the vitriol from the RW on another
"activist" "leftist"...judge.
grrr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Seems pretty meaningless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. true dat
However, the headlines leave a mark:

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/21/padilla.charge/

Judge drops Padilla terror charge

Judge throws out terror charge in Padilla case

Judge throws out 1 charge in Jose Padilla terror case

One charge thrown out against suspected al-Qaida operative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. " ... when in law and in fact, only one crime has been committed ..."
What happened to innocent until proven guily? Was a crime even committed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I saw that and wondered the same thing.
What is a judge doing declaring that a crime was committed before the trial even begins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. If somebody gets robbed, a crime has been committed
What you can't do is to presume somebody is guilty of that crime prior to their day in court.

Except for those poor SOBs in Gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulletsandspikes Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's all falling apart for them.
They're losing everything. Fucking liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulletsandspikes Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. I just checked Fox News and they aren't reporting this.
No surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You're a braver man than I, Gunga Din
:D

Welcome to DU. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulletsandspikes Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I just love to see the shit they don't report.
Sometimes when i'm really bored I'll even read from there. Ok that's just a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. TERRA TERRA TERRA
waiting for terra alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC