Help DUing a poll on Judge Taylor's decision on warantless

[rurallib]

wiretapping if you could. I appreciate it. We are trying to turn a red area blue,blue,blue!

At the bottom of the page in the middle:
http://www.muscatinejournal.com/

[countingbluecars]

1. Done n/t

[spindrifter]

2. 44% for.

[Nite Owl]

3. Done

Do you agree with a federal judge who on Thursday ruled that the National Security Agency’s surveillance program is unconstitutional and violates free speech and privacy rights?
Yes
(102 Votes, 47%)
No
(112 Votes, 51%)
Don't know/don't care
(5 Votes, 2

[Richard Steele]

4. DONE, 48% agree.

[Dinger]

5. Done - 50% Yes, 48% No! (nt)

[rurallib]

6. Bless you. You make an old man cry.

[MoJoWorkin]

7. done. 51% YES--- agree with Judge Taylor

[me b zola]

8. growing stronger

Do you agree with a federal judge who on Thursday ruled that the National Security Agency’s surveillance program is unconstitutional and violates free speech and privacy rights?

Yes--------------(127 Votes, 51%)

No----------------(117 Votes, 47%)

Don't know/don't care----(5 Votes, 2%)


When msnbc did a similar poll, I e-mailed them and asked them to include a link to the judge's decision by the poll(or at least the article about the decision). I said it might help for people to understand what it is they are voting on. Face it, what most people know about the decision is from the hidious media coverage that it has recieved, which is mostly bush*s talking points saying why he disagrees with the ruling. :eyes: My e-mail was disregarded, but I felt as though I needed to do it. :D

[pooja]

9. Done and its now ahead.

[Sydnie]

10. 54% YES nt

[Eric J in MN]

11. Done. NT

NT

[Oceansaway]

12. .

Do you agree with a federal judge who on Thursday ruled that the National Security Agency’s surveillance program is unconstitutional and violates free speech and privacy rights?

Yes
(158 Votes, 55%)

No
(122 Votes, 43%)

Don't know/don't care
(5 Votes, 2%)

[biscotti]

13. done

yes 56%

[Mr_Spock]

14. Only a fucking Nazi would vote no

What the fuck is wrong with people? Why can't they simply take a step back and see the obviousness of this - it is ILLEGAL!


No ifs, ands or buts about it.

People who would break the law to support their leader are the type that make good Nazi's.

[Seabiscuit]

37. 995 good BushNazis in Muscatine, Iowa as of this post.

:puke:

[mnhtnbb]

15. Yes 57%

[ellenfl]

16. done, 57 to 41 eom

[flyarm]

17. done!!! n/t

[graywarrior]

18. Done

[stillcool]

19. ..............

Do you agree with a federal judge who on Thursday ruled that the National Security Agency’s surveillance program is unconstitutional and violates free speech and privacy rights?
Yes

(181 Votes, 58%)
No

(128 Votes, 41%)
Don't know/don't care

(5 Votes, 2%)
Close this Window

[waveof1]

20. Done with pleasure.

:kick:

[Tarheel_Dem]

21. Done....

n/t

[dave502d]

22. Done. n/t

[DesertRat]

23. Done! k&r

[Vidar]

24. done

[Poiuyt]

25. It's being freeped

Do you agree with a federal judge who on Thursday ruled that the National Security Agency’s surveillance program is unconstitutional and violates free speech and privacy rights?

Yes (236 Votes, 46%)
No (277 Votes, 53%)
Don't know/don't care (5 Votes, 1%)

[Seabiscuit]

29. It has been freeped - 38% yes, 61% no.

[DemInDistress]

26. done 56% yes 43% no 5% don't know or care nt

[City Lights]

27. done. eom

[OhioChick]

28. Done n/t

[andlor]

30. done

[SalmonChantedEvening]

31. Done

:kick:

[madokie]

32. 39% yes 61% no total of 812 votes

the last time I voted it was the oposite:shrug::blush:

[diddlysquat]

33. done!

[ElsewheresDaughter]

34. done

[OregonBlue]

35. 40% yes, 60% no.

[texpatriot2004]

36. it's been freeped nm