Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Jackson's remarks today re the Lamont race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:45 PM
Original message
Jesse Jackson's remarks today re the Lamont race
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 03:39 PM by me b zola
I have transcribed some of Jesse Jackson's remarks made today at the DNC's general session. Jackson spoke to many issues, but for this post I focused on his remarks about the CT Senate race.

(...)
There's been a big debate lately, Chairman, about how and why did Lamont win in CT. How did he reclaim the moral center? As we move toward the fall, the team with the broadest most (?) coalition, whose direction and priorities address our fears and hopes will win.

There'll be two teams on the field. You must not be decieved even by those who seek to be on one team, and gains benifits from another.

There will be black and white and brown players on both teams. We cannot choose teams by skin color, but by direction, by uniform color, by where they are going. So one team, so all players must be on their own team, in their own huddle.

There's a Trent Lott from MS team, he rolls with Strom Thurman. There's a Tom Delay on their team, with gerrymandered districts for black and Latino voters, & forced to resign from office in disgrace. There's the Bill Frist. There's George Allen with his love affair of the confederacy. There's Gingrich, who authored the infamous contract on America. There's Condaliza Rice, & there's Steele, and Swan, and Blackwell and bush & cheney--that's their team.

Now, they have a right to be on that team, but not in our huddle.

We applaud them as the loyal opposition in this battle of ideas. They cannot be on their team and in our huddle. There's another team--Senator Harry Reed and Hillary Clinton, and Congresswoman (?), and Loretta Sanchez, and Nancy Pelosi, and Maxine Waters, and Senators Obama and Kennedy, and Gov. Richardson, and Mayor Shirley (?), and Congressman Woo and Watt and (?)---that's our team.

Stay on your team.


It's not a perfect team, but it's our team. It looks like America. It's contrast is strong. It's not a perfect team, but it's a clear alternative. Last week Ned Lamont showed us the way and CT people responded.

Watch this. Why did Dick Cheney and Chairmen Melman try to choose our winner? Exault the loser and denegrate the winner? What interest do they have in our huddle? What interest do they have in the party huddle of the Democratic Party? We do not need Cheney and bush* to explain Lamont. The people of CT did that--thank you.

How did Lamont win? He ran as a Democrat--with spine and strength, and touched the souls of those who long for change hope. He was a rich man teaching poor children to learn. Inspiring their parents to become involved. He learned first hand the life options. He didn't treat them as pariahs. He knew the results of children with a late start at home and at school with inadaquate resources leading to early dismissal. In contrast to kids a few miles away in the sub-burbs with resources driven by property taxes and (?) advantage.

He was attacked for being wealthy, as if he had betrayed some covenent. The Good Samaritan was a man of means. Charactor is measured by how you treat people, not by what you have. How did he win? He stood for universal pre-Kindergarden care, a life often afforded to the well-off. (....?....). How'd he win? Support for universal health care. A coal miner dies every six hours of black lung disease, 500,000 die every year from cancer. We need comprehensive health care for every American.

He won because he made sense. It was not a one issue campaign.

How'd he win? He supports public education for all, not vouchers for a few. He supports affirmative action, a law designed to off-set years of negative action imposed upon women and people of color. Thus it is a majority issue, not a minority issue.

How'd he win? He declared that war is not a single issue--in Iraq it is the central issue. Impacting terror in the world and our national security. The impact of this war is not limited to one corner of the earth. This war is built on a false foundation. We've been lied to, spied on. We're losing lives, and money, and honor, making bad choices. We chose to (?) in Iraq over UN observers which bush* sought to discredit.

We went to the dentist with a toothache and pulled the wrong tooth. Now we have a mouth full of blood and we're still aching. It's time to change the direction. It's time to change the direction.

These positions are not some lunatic left, this is the moral center.

(...)


Jackson goes on to close with scalding the rw with their hypocracy using the word moral to describe their policies, and explains why the Democratic platform is truly moral--but that should have a thread of it's own!!

Jesse Jackson was fabulous!!!







edited to correct a spelling error.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jackson needs to shut the fuck up
Idiots like him are not helping Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CollegeDUer Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The black lawmakers who speak the truth are always attacked like this
I'm not surprised you'd do that to him. The anti-establishment types are evil, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you read his remarks?
Or do just wait to attack one of our strongest Black activist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Jesse Jackson is a good man who has a right to speak.
You should be ashamed for calling him an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. No, he is a bad man who says good things.
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 11:32 PM by NobleCynic
There is plenty to dislike about him personally, but the causes he champions are usually just. He is articulate, intelligent, and phrases his arguments in a very effective manner. Still doesn't make him a saint. A tragic and flawed figure, noble in many respects, but divisive enough that he can hurt causes he embraces as much as he helps.

As a note, it isn't fair what the media has done to him. Many politicians have much worse things hidden away in the personal and marital lives, but catch far less flak for it. Doesn't change the fact that it can and will be used against him, and against anything he supports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #45
54. silly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisau214 Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. What a Load of Nonsensical Nonsense
Edited on Sun Aug-20-06 04:13 PM by chrisau214
Jesse Jackson is a good man who has done more good work than most people on this planet. Does he have flaws and does he occasionally take the wrong side on certain issues? Of course he does. He is, after all a human being. This doesn't make him a 'bad' man it makes him human.

If you perceive him as divisive it is either because you have have blindly followed the marching orders of the right wing spin machine that attempts to demonize anyone and everyone that they perceive as a threat to their represhive hateful ideals or because you expect strict ideological purity on every issue.

Jesse Jackson may not be a perfect man but there is no question that he is a good man.





Chris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-21-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. It is an unfortunate truth that
if the right wing spin machine has latched onto someone as an iconic figure to demonize, he has indeed become divisive. Supporters of the status quo are usually forgiven their sins, all the while they scream and shout the sins of their enemies to the skies. You're absolutely correct that Jackson has done incredible good in his political life. He is on the forefront of almost every important issue, and almost always on the more noble side.

Maybe I was a little excessive in my speech regarding him. I offer an apology for that.

It is just that I understand perfectly why many, while they agree with most of his positions, at the same time distance themselves from him. His past mistakes make it very easy to attack him, and the conservatives use ad hominem attacks on issues he supports because Jackson supports those issues. The day the voting public becomes intelligent enough to analyze the man's arguments instead of simply judging the man, Jesse Jackson will be an acclaimed hero outside of just the black and liberal communities. As it is though, a public appearance with Jesse Jackson is more likely to cost a politician more votes than it gets in almost any district.

It is an unfortunate truth that those who wish to effect change are always demonized completely out of proportion compared to those who support the status quo. It is also an unfortunate truth that in our society that this applies doubly to a black man with political aspirations. That he is flawed makes him human, that he lapsed in vigilance is tragic, that he might have expected different treatment is foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Keep talkin', Jesse.
All Democratic candidates should follow suit and make the matter of morality the centerpiece of their campaigns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. DAmn. I rarely have this problem...
do I hit REC first, or Alert first? Decision decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks, elehhhhna
It not only bites to read that comment at all, but as the first response it managed to stink up the entire thread. If the poster really is interested in seeing a Lamont victory this Nov, he would have done well to read what Jesse had said. I thought that Jackson's remarks were spot on and was a strong message to Dems to get behind our Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Trust me, m be zola, it doesn't
stink up the thread at all..and thank you so much for posting. I'm all emotional reading Jesse's words..cause they're so eloquently true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thanks, zidzi
I hope c-span replays the event. The little bit that I watched was great. The Dem candidate for Ohio SOS spoke about all of the voting issues/problems in Ohio. But the best was hearing Jesse.

Jackson's clearity of thought and eloquence of language touches me deeply. He usually leaves me with goose-bumps. Just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. some people need to be ignored.
me b zola, this is an important thread and thanks for transcribing and posting for us. Your efforts are appreciated!

Jesse Jackson is indeed an eloquent speaker who represents the best of the Democratic party. I don't always agree with him, but I don't ALWAYS agree with ANYONE.

Our tent is larger thanks to Jackson; it is diminished by the poster you reference. Just ignore it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Boy, you hit the nail on the head.
What a complete JERK that idiot is for saying that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
43. ahhhh go for the alert!!!!!!!!..good going!!..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. What is your problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. WTF!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. And idiots like you are? How does your comment help anything?
May be you are on the wrong board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. looks like a "hit and run " to me!!...a little gutless eh??..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Rev Jackson was one of the few Dems who came to Ohio and fought for the
disenfranchised Dem base vote in 2004. He is now one of the few Dems working with a multitude of different groups in Ohio attempting to prevent another blackwellian experience in 2006. He is also working to convince Af Am clergy not to defect from Dem Party to support Blackwell for Gov. (As hard as it is to believe, there is significant defection to support Blackwell. I understand their anger at the Dem Party after the '04 campaign promises of counting every vote, and after waiting in 3-5 hour lines to vote Dem, not have the party fight for those votes-BUT a vote for Blackwell is a danger to democracy.)

Did you read the text of his speech? I can't understand how you could call those words "idiotic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thanks, for reminding us of all
of that 2004 disenfranchisement working overtime! Jesse's so brilliant the corporate media is scared shitless of him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. What the fuck are you spewing about?!?!?!?!
You have truly lost your mind.

We need MORE Democrats like Jackson.

It's our loss that we don't.

I have a nickle somewhere in my pocket - go buy a clue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Why? Because LIEberman is using him as a boogey-man at
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 05:10 PM by Kahuna
Rove's urging? LIEberman is using Jesse and Sharpton as boogey-man, even though they both spoke on our national stage at the 2004 convention. If the Democratic party thought they were polarizing do you think they would have given them that platform? Joe the slug is the problem. Not Jackson. And for the record my young friend (You must be young. Only youthful ignorance can justify that outburst), Jackson got more votes when he ran for President then Lieberman did when he ran. So, I suggest Joe is the one who needs to STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Tell it like it is, Jesse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. "A personal attack is committed when a person substitutes abusive remarks
for evidence when attacking another person's claim or claims."

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/personal-attack.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Excuse me?

How is he not helping Lamont?

I may not always agree with Jesse but I want him to keep talking.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. wtf are you talking about? do you take the time to read the posts,
or are you just a knee-jerk flame thrower?

speaking of idiots . . . :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. back away from the rovian drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
51. Me thinks he could be a subject of the CIA's MKULTRA program! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisau214 Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. What About His Words Bother You?
Everything quoted in the OP was dead-on correct. Every Democrat in the Senate and Congress needs to repeat them and repeat them often.





Chris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. We are STILL waiting for your explanation about where exactly
is the "idiocy" in the OP article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Jackson needs to keep speaking out!!
Idiots -- and there are many -- need to shut the fuck up.

Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. darryl is looking a bit wittle today...
not big like he thinks he is.

wittle darryl lost his moral way in the big, bad world....and doesn't like to hear it from truly BIG men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Wow, a personal attack on Jackson
with no substantial criticism of either him or his message. How convincing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. repost
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 10:22 PM by KaptBunnyPants
repost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. 5 years ago I might have agreed with you, however
After many years at the University of DU, I have come to realize that 5 years ago I hardly knew anything about Jessie Jackson. I didnt know a lot of things 5 years ago. So I might have parroted the right wings smears on Jessie Jackson, because that is what uninformed people do. And they do it about a lot of things, not just Jessie Jackson.

The right wing MACHINE plays the attack game and ridicules people like Jessie Jackson, Hillary, Howard Dean and movements like the election fraud movement and the 9/11 truth movement.

You have drank the cool-aid and proven that the Swiftboating of Jessie Jackson has been successful unfortunately.

What exactly has Jessie Jackson done to deserve your scorn? This is a man who has worked most of his life for the progressive movements to advance the life of the poor and disenfranchised. Nothing in his speech today yields that he should shut the fuck up.

I am sorry you are not at the stage of being free from the brainwashing the right wing machine produces. I hope someday you too can see the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autonomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
48. I don't think I've ever seen a response
seem so out of place on DU, not even obvious flamebait. You could not have read the same speech I just read. I am very curious what provoked that response. I'd really like to hear an explanation of that post.

(My money is on the ignorance of the subject combined with having had a really bad day.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
50. self deleted.
Edited on Sun Aug-20-06 04:52 AM by w4rma
Its enough for you to know that it was a really pissed off message at yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
52. Someone should
but not Jesse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
53. Explain
why he should shut up and how he isn't helping Lamont. Can't do it? I didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
55. May Jesse Jackson and
Al Sharpton NEVER STFU! Those two speak truth to power better than most anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. And who is better in your view
to speak to the issue? Who would you choose to speak to minority voters?

Why shouldn't he speak in support of Lamont?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Recommended #1.
Love him or hate hime, Jesse's speech is DEAD ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Great speech. He says it better than just about anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. KNR! Football metaphore, I love it!
"There's Condaliza Rice, & there's Steele, and Swan, and Blackwell and bush & cheney--that's their team.

Now, they have a right to be on that team, but not in our huddle."


"How did Lamont win? He ran as a Democrat--with spine and strength, and touched the souls of those who long for change hope. He was a rich man teaching poor children to learn. Inspiring their parents to become involved. He learned first hand the life options. He didn't treat them as pariahs. He knew the results of children with a late start at home and at school with inadaquate resources leading to early dismissal. In contrast to kids a few miles away in the sub-burbs with resources driven by property taxes and (?) advantage."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent
Why did Dick Cheney and Chairmen Melman try to choose our winner? Exault the loser and denegrate the winner? What interest do they have in our huddle? What interest do they have in the party huddle of the Democratic Party? We do not need Cheney and bush* to explain Lamont. The people of CT did that--thank you.


Well said, Jesse Jackson.You can keep on speaking for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Excellent analysis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Jesse Jackson was fabulous!!!"
When isn't he? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. What a wonderful, wonderful speech he gave. He is simply great.
And BTW, he looks terrific. He must have been a beautiful baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Jesse needs to KEEP TALKING the fuck up!
Speaking truth to power. I can hear the spirit of Martin Luther King whispering in those words.

Great analogy about having the tooth pulled and a mouth full of blood. But bush and cheney and lieberman want to punch us in the mouth and break a few more teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Very inspirational message.
Must have come from above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
32. lol -- jesse rocks the house!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. He was AWESOME!!!!
I LOVED the parts about the "moral center," too!!! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #35
57. Jesse was great n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. K&R
I liked how Jessie worked in Contract ON America. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. I love JesseJackson..i was
a dem delegate to the dem convention and i got to meet Rev Jackson several times..he is just wonderful..he talks to you like you are the only person in the world..

and he is a huge man..and as my dad would say..he is a man's man...and yet gentle at the same time..

he has a presence that is unmatched..you feel his greatness when you share space with him.

I have such respect for this man..and thank you me b zola..i have tears in my eyes reading your post..

about a man i truely love!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. I have never had the privilage to meet Jesse
...But I had the good fortune to hear him speak in person. Clinton was running for re-election and Jackson came to the school that I was attending to speak on the issues. Just wow--he was electrifying. I felt his greatness and I was in the standing room only section!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
49. Continuing the analogy:...
...What happens when you have a few players on the team vying to be leaders--one who, in fact, has been the starting quarterback before--and a couple of assistant coaches who insist on training the team to only run a few plays that have been given to them by the opposing team and coaching staff? What if we have a great running attack but refuse to use it simply because the opposing coaches keep telling everyone that a valid passing offense is the only thing that will work? What if the referees continually make some suspicious calls but we never file a protest with the league office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
56. Thanks for posting this
Jesse is THE MAN. I'd follow him to the ends of the earth..

I created a flash about this LIEberman situation, see it here:

Here's my latest work all about Joe LIEberman's ridiculous run as a "Party of One", which reminds me of "Army of One" (which gives ME a mental image of a guy stuck under fire in a foxhole, looking around and saying, "WHERE the hell IS EVERYBODY!!") :) -- Makes about as much sense in a marketing vein. Party of One, Translates into "Party of NONE" when it involved LIEberman, might as well be saying, "Party of ME", eh?

This flash also incorporates the fact that the Terror Lockdown on Liquids, etc came so close on the heels of Joe's Smackdown by Lamont as to not be considered credible - even today they are confirming that people will walk FREE because they don't have the evidence to hold them, let alone that there were NO Explosives in their possession, they hadn't even made reservations, etc, etc..

Meanwhile they talk about charging a PREGNANT woman for having some water, and a face wipe - this flash addresses those concerns as well, the fact that WE are being used as PUPPETS in a The Politics of Terror.

Remember, a republican said they'd ride this last nonThreat all the way into November. Let's prove them wrong.. Let's VOTE for Lamont, as we all know this last Primary was a referendum on Bush and his faked "war". The Nerve of LIEberman to shit all over the Democrats. It's like using a girlfriend to get you through medical school and then snatching up the Trophy Wife once you've graduated. How can we ever trust this Puppet again?

One of my best Flash works ever, and to the Tune of "Masters of War" by Mr Bob Dylan, and no truer words were spoken in our time.

Have a look at:

http://web.takebackthemedia.com/geeklog/public_html/staticpages/index.php?page=20060819044200833

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. Good flash...

Democracy needs eloquent spokespersons...You and Jesse are two of the best.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Great work, Symbolman!
...and an honorable mention to Mr. Dylan for the soundtrack.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
59. "...they have a right to be on that team, but not in our huddle."
I love this speech. Pick a team and stay on it. If you don't want to play on that team any longer--because you are a Loserman--then you are off the team. Period. If you defect, then you lose your place on the team that you were on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
62. "He ran as a Democrat--with spine and strength, and touched the souls
of those who long for change hope. He was a rich man teaching poor children.." WOW!! Yes we need this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC