Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush thinks he can blow off the NSA ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:22 AM
Original message
If Bush thinks he can blow off the NSA ruling
then it will embolden him to blow off any other things he doesn't agree with (such as the 22nd Amendment).

This September hearing in fron to Judge Taylor is crucial. If the judge upholds her ruling, and the ACLU does not agree to a stay pending appeal, the issue for Bush will be laid bare:

EITHER ABIDE BY A COURT RULING YOU DON'T LIKE,

OR

DEFY THE RULING AND BECOME A CRIMINAL.

Lots of us already consider him a criminal, but this will just make it all the more obvious.

And if voters can't (or won't) replace the Congress in November in this situation, God help us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. He thinks laws are like a cafeteria line....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think the judge issued a "signing statement" or ruling
That just sorta, kinda conflicts with the chimps interpretation of the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. He already ignores whatever he likes.
Have you seen those AbuGhraib photos B*shCabal™ was ordered
to release last year yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Did ya know Dubai Ports World currently controls 23 US ports?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. What the hell happened with that? I was following it on the ACLU
website, and I have no idea where it went. Are they simply in defiance of a court order at this point, or is it still being appealed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Their time to appeal (after they lost the 1st appeal) ran out...
...and they are in violation at this point.
About a week AFTER their time ran out, there was a bizarre statement
that they were considering an appeal at some future time...
then silence.

No bullshit spin, no comment at all, just plain ignoring the court order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Is the ACLU still pursuing the matter?
Thank you for the update- I'd seen no info on the subject in months. I don't understand how they can simply be in violation of a court order without being publicly skewered. It's ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. There's nothing left to pursue: they WON already.
The only person who could take
any further steps is the Judge, who
could (should) start issueing warrants
for the named defendants, but how do you
enforce a warrant for the Dept. of Defense?

We, the People, are just so completely SCREWED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you really think *&co will abide by ANY law??
He has proven to us over and over that he can do whatever he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush won't be in office on January 21, 2009.
Maybe there will be another corporate tool in that office.

Maybe someone decent will be in that office.

It isn't in the corporate interest to create an uprising through something as blatant as Bush staying in office.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. He can't stay in office
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 10:38 AM by Texas Explorer
the Constitution allows only 2 terms for any one individual. Do you think he can just blow that off? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Honestly, nope.
But only because it's not the neocons' style. The names are mostly interchangeable for them- they'd just run another moronic puppet who can be told what to do and believe it's his idea. Just watching Bush and his "l'etat c'est moi" attitude, I can imagine him trying to stay in. He's just that egomaniacal and power hungry. But he isn't nearly as important as he thinks he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. If the hearing you're referencing is about a "stay" of the judge's orders
pending appeal (which seems odd, such hearings generally occur much earlier) I thought I read something about both sides agreeing in advance to stay the orders pending appeal.

IOW, that hearing isn't really important at all.

The Chimp is putting all of his eggs into one basket: his new appointments to the US Supreme Court. When he says "appeals court" what he means is not the federal appeals court that will next hear the case, he's referring to the ultimate court of appeal, the US Supreme Court.

Bet your bottom dollar also that as soon as he gets his "stay" in writing, he'll instruct his lawyers to employ every delaying tactic in the book to drag this thing out for another two years if possible so he doesn't have to be embarrassed by another court ordering him to stop his surveillance during the remainder of his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pazuzu Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. John Boehner said Congress
will void the ruling and give Bush what he wants. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. they can't void the constitution w/o making him dictator
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 11:00 AM by MissWaverly
By saying that he is above the law that is what they would be doing, hey, but maybe
that's what John A. Boehner (R-8th/OH) wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. He can "blow it off" and he will.
Short of tossing Bush and Cheney both out of the White House there's not a darn thing we can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Court ordered a stay until appeal is completed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC