Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Did Lieberman Ask For Sharpton's Endorsement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:59 PM
Original message
Why Did Lieberman Ask For Sharpton's Endorsement?
Joe Lieberman is now playing the race card, attacking Ned Lamont for reaching out to national African American leaders. Lieberman is specifically attacking, for instance, Al Sharpton. The New York Times reports "Lieberman aides said that Mr. Lamont's association with Mr. Sharpton ...was a political albatross." Lieberman's campaign issued a statement calling Sharpton one "of the more divisive and problematic figures in the Democratic Party." But, then, if Lieberman really believes that, here's a simple question: why did Joe Lieberman ask Al Sharpton to endorse his campaign?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-did-lieberman-ask-for_b_27461.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's gone insane?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I really think so, i think he is a crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. He miscalculated...badly (what else is new?)
Had Sharpton endorsed him, JoeMentum would be calling him "One of the boldest and most forward-thinking figures in the Democratic Party."

Joe is a total tool. An "anything to win" type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's no excuse for being a shmuck on top of everything else Joe
What a shmucky campaign so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought he was a "Clinton Democrat" and not
a "Sharpton Democrat."

Oh how I loath Joe!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. In a swearing contest between Sharpton and Lieberman
I am not sure who I would believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I know who I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know why, but . .
. . I can't imagine why Democrats (or anyone with a brain) would admire scam artist and con-man Al Sharpton. I imagine there is some decent number of voters who each election seriously consider voting Dem - and then remember that almost all Dem pols seek Sharpton's blessing - and say "No, I don't think so".

Maybe I'm missing something but is there something to recommend Al other than having his finger on a number of black American votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I suspect Joe asked Joe to endorse him to get the black vote.
But I think I remember Al standing behind Ned in his acceptance speech. Hmmmm

Sure Al is a very outspoken guy, but I gotta tell ya, I really like him! He takes no shit from anyone! His responses always make sense. He can pose questions to his opponents in a debate that makes them stutter!

And BTW, I'm a caucasion (hate the white label, it always makes me feel like some kind of fake ghost!) and I've always believed in listening to the person and not the heritage!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Much of Sharpton's campaign money for his Presidential run
came from republicans.

He and Lieberman have a lot in common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I don't know anything about the money, but I can tell you that
Sharpton has ipressed me with his witt, and his ability to smack his opponents very effectively.

I really have not seen Al loose a debate on TV in a very ong time...if ever!

You can ave your arguments against some of his positions, but the guy is very good with his words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because Sharpton will do anything for money
Including working for republicans ...... a Mr. Stone is his fav.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Lieberman has proven
to be the scurrilous, obnoxious little creep that many of us have long suspected and maintained. I find no joy in the confirmation.
How he can imagine that his silly shallowness would endear him to anyone but republiclowns is alternately amazing and sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Joe did not "Choose Wisely"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Did I ever tell you that you are my Fav?
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0406,barrett,50930,5.html



Sharpton's profligate spending had already "disgusted" Watkins, who found his excesses—including "high-life" stays at the Mansion on Turtle Creek in Dallas ($3,264), the Mandarin Oriental in Miami ($3,645), and Four Seasons in Los Angeles ($7,343)—"completely out-of-bounds." While Sharpton was reserving the most expensive suites for two aides and himself, Watkins had only collected two weeks of pay and run up $13,944 in travel and other expenses that had gone unreimbursed (the campaign still owes him $55,111 in combined salary and expenses). Halloran was also suddenly bringing in a two-man consulting company for field operations, and Elizebeth Burke as a scheduler, introducing Watkins to all three.

The mystery about how all this would be paid for was soon solved, through the National Action Network (NAN), Sharpton's long-standing nonprofit. Halloran told Watkins: "There's no money in the campaign, but money is pouring into NAN. We have to figure out a way of doing what we have to do with the money we have." NAN would principally pay Burke, and the consultants, in an apparent end run around federal election law and nonprofit regulations. Unbeknownst to Watkins, Stone was pumping hundreds of thousands of dollars into NAN.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. You are breaking out the terminal cuteness for me tonight
and it is much appreciated. I've had a hell of a bad week and your "snuggles" mean more than you could ever know. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Your reference/link is real old:

Sharpton's Cynical Campaign Choice
Reverend Al Dumps Jesse's Best for Bush's Buddy
by Wayne Barrett with special reporting by Jennifer Suh
February 11 - 17, 2004

I had disdain for Rev Al, but not lately. (Who among us hasn't screwed up? I was in NY for the Brawley debacle) I like him! He's a smart guy, a Dem, and he has the flair to not only get air time, but to help Dems. He's okay in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. he takes money from repugs
end of story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Recently? I had to ask. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karnac Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. he is trying to draw Sharpton in
Sharpton is a potentially very devisive character among many white voters. Considering the small black population in connecticut is not as much to lose.

If he causes Sharpton to officially endorse Lamont you could see what might happen.

Lieberman also demonstrates his "independence" this way from the "far left"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's no more than a divisive republican talking point..
Sharpton is already working with the Lamont campaign and Lamont has already said he is happy to have him on board. Lierberman is appealing to the idiotic republican base, trying to pass on talking points for the 'wackos', a name their leaders call them, to mindlessly parrot. Kinda like you are doing now.

How is it independent to repeatedly invite someone to join your campaign, and then when they choose to work for your opponent you then try and smear them?

Maybe Lieberman will agree to debate sharpton on his divisiveness, or any other topic, I'd pay a dollar to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karnac Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Dont think Lieberman ever wanted an endorsement period
they are just too different. There was no chance in hell for it to happen.

Whether it is an honest tactic to for lieberman to ask for the impossible is a different question.

Sharpton is low profile right now, a smart move in the general. I believe Lieberman wishes it was otherwise for the reasons you stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Of course he wanted an endorsement
From Al Sharpton, Minister Farrakhan's, or anyone else. He was grasping for any straw to win the primary.

This independent run speaks volumes as to how desperate he is to hold on to power, no matter whose butt he would have to kiss, or shoes he would shine.

And despite anything he has to say right now, if wins the general, we will hear about how since the Dem party left him he sadly is force to switch parties.

He is being bought and paid for right now. He will follow the money. So there goes the voting with Dems 90% of the time.

The man is a slime ball opportunist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think he read the wrong Triangulation manual.
"Triangulation for Dickheads" was meant to be a spoof. Around these parts we call it "retreat to the middle". Its political kin to white flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Nice post.
This cat...has claws!

Joe now has a life choice to make: to become a statesman, a role he's qualified for, and entitled to, or to remain a politician, and rot away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'd say Lieberman assumed he could buy Sharpton for a token black
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 10:21 PM by Nothing Without Hope
spokesman and now has sour grapes because this ploy didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Cause joe needs all
the supporters he can get and when they won't support him.. he turns on them like a vicious, rabid weasel(sorry weasels).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think he wants Sharpton to bad mouth him.
So he can use Sharpton's perceived "race baiting insanity" against Lamont. He doesn't really want Sharpton on his team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC