Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING! Republican NRSC Takes Lieberman (OH NO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:59 PM
Original message
BREAKING! Republican NRSC Takes Lieberman (OH NO)
http://thepoliticker.observer.com/2006/08/nrsc-takes-lieberman.html

NRSC Takes Lieberman

It's no coincidence that a purposeful silence has replaced the well-publicized calls from Republicans last month for no-hope GOP Senate candidate Alan Schlesinger to make way for someone more credible.

The state and national party, it seems, have concluded that they can't succeed in Connecticut this year under any circumstance, and would rather see Joe Lieberman win -- which polls show he's likely to do, absent a credible Republican candidate -- than risk handing the election to Democrat Ned Lamont.

This morning, a source at the National Republican Senatorial Committee confirmed in a phone interview that the party will not help Schlesinger or any other potential Republican candidate in Connecticut, and it now favors a Lieberman victory in November.

"We did a poll and there is no way any Republican we put out there can win, so we are just going to leave that one alone," said the NRSC source.

Instead, the NRSC is pulling for Lieberman over Ned Lamont, who rode an anti-war message to a victory in the Aug 8 primary.

"Most Republicans would agree that he'd clearly be a better choice than Lamont," said the source.
--Jason Horowitz


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will Connecticut put up with this?
Will dem voters stay with a man now officially annointed as the Republican candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dirty tricks are their stock in trade
They don't even back their own candidate so that they can bring Holy Joe back in to kiss Bush's ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Joe is a "credible Republican candidate "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. OHhhhhh. ROFLMAO!
:rofl: :rofl:

It doesn't get any clearer than that. Joe the liarman is..."a credible Republican candidate".

At least that has been cleared up. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. DUH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's official! Joe, you can take the mask off now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Kiss of Death...
for Joe? I certainly hope so. Figuratively speaking of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohMunich99 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. This should rip out any Democratic support Lieberman had
In addition, Lamont should hammer away at this with Independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Exactly right.
Lamont should use this support to drive Democrats away from Lieberman. "The only Democrat endorsed by Republicans."

And, as you said, Independents would be as reluctant to support a candidate endorsed by the RSCC as they are to support Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It should. It also shows that the Repugs are very stupid to
get involved in this for that reason. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Puh-leeeze DEMS -- PLEASE use this against Lieberman! PLEASE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Smart on their part
Why bother throwing money away on a guy polling at 4% with a history of gambling problems?

Instead, they may as well take the guy that mouths their talking points for them and favors their own loony foreign policy as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Joe has confirmed he was a PUB Mole in the DEM Party and he
needs to be defeated as such. What a no Class LOSER....Posing as one of us when he is one of THEM. Sinful and decietful...HE IS EVIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC