Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAFFERTY VIDEO IS UP at Crooksandliars.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:21 PM
Original message
CAFFERTY VIDEO IS UP at Crooksandliars.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was first to nominate...
eat your hearts out!! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, I can't take watching CNN anymore
but I really wanted to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. same here - was on C&L hitting refresh! I can't watch CNN anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cactus Jack used to piss me off, but...
...he's one of the FEW (save KO) who actually STANDS UP for us!!!

K&R! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. HEY! Don't everybody jump on it all at once like that!
'Cause I can't see it like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. sorry 'bout that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. lol!
I was talking to all these news-hungry fiends. EVERYone wants to see what C&Liars got!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks and kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Finally
someone said (besides us!) he violated his oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. * is a traitor without doubt.
Wolfie must need new underware everytime Jack opens his mouth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. I loves me some Jack! Thanks, helderheid & C&L! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. aww!
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just sent the link
niece who is a newly minted voter, with the comment - "This is why it's important for you to vote in November." I know she will (I took her to register and she's excited to vote), but a little reinforcement never hurts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Good on you getting her registered!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Thanks,
she's the one who "Rocks".... It will too soon be up to her generation to sort out the mess we have left them....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. comment on "wolfs" jacket.......
being in Jerusalem does you good.(or something to that effect......and the first letter Jack reads is .The emperor has no clothes.

was that a dig at Wolf????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
HooRay for Cafferty!!!!

He didn't just attack the bush* administration, but slammed the bush* controlled "Republican" congress for their failure to provide oversight for the American People!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Like Cronkite or Murrow
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 05:19 PM by BrightKnight
That was like listening to Cronkite or Murrow. True journalism is apparently not dead.

-------
I nominate him for one of these:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
61. not dead but often buried in the dirt of infotainment, propoganda and mis-
information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. What a relief it is to hear someone, anyone, speak plainly and
truthfully on the television about these snakes in Washington. The President* knowingly and deliberately broke the law...period. And he lied to the American public...period. Good for you Jack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Amen to that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R n/t

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. I love Jack!
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Everyone Broadcast This Link -- To Everywhere!!
To all Euphemedia members.

To all "leaders" and especially their staffs (yes, each one separately).

To all relatives and friends.

Post it to all forums you can find.

This is the simple reality that the DC/Euphemedia Analstocracy can pretend doesn't exist by not saying/hearing the actual words.

This is literally how it works. They pretend it's not a crime, it's (just a little game of) "power grab." Just "overreaching." Anything but the pure truth that must be acted upon.

Force them to hear it and minds will change. They really will.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Shoot! My kid has been screwing with my computer again and ...
messed with the sound. Transcript is great, but I would so dearly love to hear it in his own voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. Helderheid, thanks for posting! Read some of the comments
at Cafferty's blog: http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/blog /

A couple smart and a couple moronic comments:

What does a federal judge's ruling that the NSA spying program is illegal mean for President Bush?

Nothing. He's broken laws before and nothing has been done. This will be no different. Authoritarianism, my friend.
Brian, Winfield, Alabama

It means that once again the President must deal with these liberal judges... President Bush is simply trying to protect the American people. Give him a break Cafferty!
Eric, Arlington, Texas

It says Bush is a crook on two counts now: warrantless wiretapping and prisoner abuse.
Jim, Grants Pass, Oregon

The question should be: what does it mean to the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives since they are the ones that would prosecute any illegal activities committed by a sitting president.
Tony, New Jersey

All of you people who are trying to take away the tools our government needs to catch terrorists, will be the first to say that the President didn't do enough to connect the dots if we have another attack in this country. You can't have it both ways.
Joann, Pennsylvania

It means he's more appealing than ever.
Bill, Leesburg, Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. Just emailed this thank you
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 05:35 PM by pat_k
To: caffertyfile@cnn.com
Subject: Finally, the TRUTH. Thank You Jack!!
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:28:18 +0000

Thank you for saying what should be obvious to all. Bush has nuked our
Constitution with his claims to unrestrained power. Spying on us without a
warrant is intolerable, but it is his claim to unitary authoritarian power to
commit that crime (and others) with impunity that is truly devastating to our
system of government.

Given the gravity and urgency of the threat to our constitutional democracy,
members of Congress have a sworn duty to take immediate action to defend the
nation. To date, only a handful have responded to Sen. Feingold's or Rep. Conyers'
call to action.

Fear of political consequences cannot excuse those who are sitting on their
hands. We expect members of our armed services to risk life and limb to support
and defend. Why should we expect less from members of Congress?

Hearing a public figure tell the truth about the criminal surveillance program
should not be a momentous event. Tragically, these days, it is.

Dare I hope you do not remain a lone voice at CNN?

Cheers,

Patty Keeshan
A fellow party to our common contract (the Constitution)
Westfield, NJ









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I suggest you submit that to all of DU for signatures and then
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 05:50 PM by Sydnie
lets forward it to ALL of the congress critters. Post it stand alone and ask for signatures, you will get them!

Great letter!

edit - typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I agree! pat_k BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
56. Do you think I should. . . .
. . .edit to be a letter to members, or seek signers as is and then send to Cafferty as a letter from all amd copy members of Congress (perhaps delivering in person to key members -- it is a relatively short train ride from Westfield).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. I would edit it to be a letter to members and CC it to Cafferty
once we have circulated and signed it. But, that is just what I would do. It is a thing of beauty as written. Delivering it in person, with a prior heads up to CNN couldn't hurt either.

Thank you for doing this. It needs to be said, supported, and said again. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I'll take a shot at editing to see what I come up with. I'm not sure
. . . whether direct or indirect would be more effective. They've gotten so may direct appeals, they've become pretty skilled at dismissing them -- the wall of rationalization for inaction is a thick one.

Perhaps an indirect message could bypass their knee jerk dismissal and prompt some to pull their heads out of the beltway sphincter for a moment and consider how the people "out there" view them.

BTW, you may be interested in this reply -- as we lobby members to fulfill their oath, we need to be crystal clear about the fact that it is members of Congress, not judges, who are duty-bound to take immediate action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Great Letter!
The American people have to put the breaks on this criminal enterprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #32
58. . . .and Congress is our voice. Contrary to what. . .
Edited on Fri Aug-18-06 12:38 PM by pat_k
. . .Contrary to what the new American fascists would have us believe, the three branches of Government DO NOT share power equally.

When we established this nation and set forth its constitution, we yielded NONE of our Sovereignty to ANY institution we created, but we did vest more power in Congress -- our voice -- than in the Judiciary or the Executive.

How do we know we gave Congress more power? Simple. We gave Congress the Power to Impeach the President and members of the Judiciary. (The President or the Judiciary Can't Impeach Congress).

Over and over, members of Congress have been derelict in their sworn Constitutional duty by allowing "technical" or "legal" arguments and rationalizations trump reality. In their cowardice, members are looking to the courts to pass judgments that are theirs and theirs alone. They did it when they failed to reject the Florida electors on 1/6/01. They did it when they failed to reject the Ohio electors on 1/6/05. They continue to rationalize their failure to move to impeach by saying "we must wait for the courts to weigh in."

We gave them, not the courts, the duty to stand in judgment of the electors on January 6th, and thus protect us against stolen Presidential elections.

We gave them, not the courts, the duty to protect us against the subversion of our constitutional democracy by our chief executive.

Their judgment of electors or Presidential actions is of necessity not bound by judicial action or the cynical misuse of the courts. If their duty was to apply the letter of the law they would have no role. We would have given the judiciary these duties.

Each them must make their own moral decision grounded in the intent, not the letter, of the law; a decision that upholds the principle of consent.

They are called upon to take action, even if they stand alone. Each member must choose: act to stop the subversion or be complicit in it.

Impeachment IS our positive agenda. What could be more positive than reminding each other:
  • that the Constitution is a contract among ourselves;
  • that we yielded NONE of our collective sovereignty to ANY institution we established;
  • that we gave NO party to the contract the right to usurp or surrender our collective sovereignty.
When high officials in the Executive or Judiciary are subverting the Constitution, our representatives in Congress are sworn to act, whatever the consequences. ("Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum" -- "Let Justice Be Done, Though the Heavens Fall")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Holy Crap!
:wow: :woohoo: :bounce: :applause: Thanks for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Best. Jack. Video. EVER!
I missed it live, but loved the replay I just watched at that link.

"For America, the hope is there. The sun is rising. Our best days are still to come." <-- John Kerry That is what this ruling today reminded me of, so I just HAD to post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
That was awesome!!! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyAziz Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. Damn!
Mr. Cafferty is right on the money, sadly some Americans will fail to see or hear the truth about what this Administration is doing. But on a high note there is a voice trying to get the truth out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. great rant
I wish there was a channel where I could get that 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. that was one of the most gutsiest and patriotic actions on cabal TV...
that i think ive ever seen, k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. Je t'aime, Jacques!!!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. K and R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. My new Hero, Jack Cafferty, singing the prettiest song I have ever heard
in all my 58 years. Finally someone says what needs to be said
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. DAAAAAAMN!!
He is not happy at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. Amen, Jack! A-damn-men! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balderdash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
40. That was beautiful!
CNN pisses me off a lot but there are Cafferty and Dobbs and I must watch them.

k&r

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
66. And those guys aren't Democrats either.
Dobbs is a Conservative and Cafferty, in my opinion, leans more toward Libertarianism but has Conservative roots. Neither is in any way, a Democrat. They're two honest men who know when there's something wrong with our government. They don't strictly adhere to Party lines like so many of the other "talking heads" and seek truth and justice rather than power and control. You know, kind of like what a REAL journalist is SUPPOSED to do. Oh, that FAUX News adopted this attitude! There's a snowball's chance in hell of that ever happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
41. Grudging "Goddamn."
Boom. Pow. Yard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txwhitedove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
42. K&R. I sent a note of thanks to the Cafferty File, too.
"Thank you for saying what should be obvious to all Americans.
Thank you for telling the truth about the 'elected' crooks & liars running
America into the ground. Thank you, Jack! ~jp"

Still watch CNN for the most 'honest' news available on TV.
Don't slam them too hard, cause real TV journalists are doing
the best they can these days. Look what happened to Dan Rather,
and now BushCo is going after New York Times....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. helderheid - please use this permalink for your post
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 09:56 PM by bushmeat
all the other links just get you to the latest entry

http://www.crooksandliars.com/posts/2006/08/17/cafferty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. hey THANKS! I can't edit at this point but I appreciate you posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yowser!
It's heartwarming to hear someone actually speak the truth for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordontron Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
47. wooooot! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
48. Thank you, Helderheid, CNN gives us ten minutes of Cafferty
and we should all feel better that CNN is getting the story out there, well not so fast CNN we are on to you, this is a much more serious matter than a ten minute soundbite from Cafferty, CNN keep playing the game, but just so you know we are on to you.

Thanks again, Helderheid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
49. it takes Republicans to show some fucking balls!!!!!?????????
Edited on Fri Aug-18-06 12:55 AM by upi402
i want my party back.
next thing ya know, Pat Buchanon will say something that needs to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
50. I saw this live yesterday
and was :applause: and screaming YES at the TV. It was so good to see someone...anyone finally speak the truth about this.

Right On Jack!!!!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
51. Wow! About time someone in the media said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
52. I love you Jack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
53. Artificial Intelligance; When the real thing just won't do.
The lawsuit alleged that the NSA "uses artificial intelligence aids to search for keywords and analyze patterns in millions of communications at any given time." Multiple lawsuits have been filed related to data-mining against phone companies, accusing them of improperly turning over records to the NSA.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060817/ap_on_go_pr_wh/warr...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
54. At least someone in the "news" media noticed
I saw threads here yesterday afternoon that the ruling wasn't being covered at all! As I'm on the left coast, I got home later and turned on the CBS Evening News. No reporting on this story at all. Not even a mention in passing. They did cover JBR, of course. To their credit, they had some decent reporting on Iraq. But they also had pieces on sun screens and on using pigeons to detect smog in LA.

They're going to hear from me today. I believe their e-mail is evening@cbsnews.com . Sheeze, and Couric doesn't even get there for another couple of weeks.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
55. Alright!!
It's great that someone in the mainstream media is saying what needs to be said about this administration. They are criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. I'm kicking for anyone who might have missed this.
It should be shared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
62. K & R - Got right to the point
how can anyone argue with that? "The President has violated his oath of office". Of course it's not the first time, but it's about time someone SAID it - not that the pResident cares, but maybe it will wake some people up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manchild Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
63. check it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
64. Beeeeautiful! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
65. He didn't really violate the constitution. He just misunderstood...
When the Chief Justice asked if he would "preserve, protect and defend" the constitution, Dubya thought he said "disturb, dissect and append."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jul 22nd 2019, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC