Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Gonzales Say They Would Not Obey The Court?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:35 PM
Original message
Did Gonzales Say They Would Not Obey The Court?
Edited on Thu Aug-17-06 03:36 PM by ThomWV
I've been looking everywhere I could think of but can't find any sort of transcript or news item indicating that the Attorney General has said the Administration WILL NOT obey the order to stop wararntless wiretapping immediately.

If they have done that then it can be said with certainty that we are in a Constitutional Crisis.

If the Executive will not be checked by the Judiciary then all is lost.

Did he say it or just hint at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I believe that is exactly what he said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. see this thread. He just said that at a news conf. on cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Am I psychic..
.. or what?

This morning, I wrote:

3. That activist snot.

But I Alberto say it's OK, and I represent the justice department.

Everything's OK in bushworld, and my fearless leader can sign
whatever law he wants whether congress voted for it or not, and
he can change the law when he signs it anyway he wants...

... just because.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I Only Know What's Said Here On DU...
But does anyone expect otherwise? Do you REALLY REALLY think they're going to obey a meaningless court order?

It's just another liberal activist judge trying to balance out their DICTATORIAL power. Like a fly on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I found this tid-bit...
The ruling won't take immediate effect so Taylor can hear a Justice Department request for a stay pending its appeal.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14393611/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAYJDF Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. this part of the rational doesn't hold water. because the taps
started prior to 9/11. I believe that has been proven.

The U.S. Justice Department appealed the ruling and issued a statement saying the program is “an essential tool for the intelligence community in the war on terror.”

BTW, thanks for the site

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bennet on ccn right now. saying WH got a stay on it as they appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bennett bringing up the Brit foiled plot and we need this TOOL>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Did he mention that Britain got warrants for its wiretaps?
Lemme guess.

He did not mention that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Did you hear him
refer to the U.S. Constitution as a "Suicide Pact"?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Who Issued The Stay? Which Court Has The Authority To Do So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I believe only the judge issuing the order can stay during appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. We don't need no stinking laws !
We make our own laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC