What if the Supreme Court ruled that Bush was guilty of torture, murder,

[kentuck]

....and war crimes? Would it make any difference? Would it take Jon Benet off the front page? Bad enough a federal judge just ruled that the NSA spying was illegal and unconstitutional. At what point does the media and the politicians say, "Hey, this is serious shit!"?

[waiting for hope]

1. You know, those activists judges...

why would they? They are the ones that made him King in 2000?

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

2. Oh, the media would pull out all the stops.

We'd get both Michael Jackson and OJ stories on the same day.

[no_hypocrisy]

3. I'd be cheering behind the barbed wire of my FEMA camp. n/t

[H2O Man]

4. Can't happen.

The Supreme Court does not consider the concepts of "guilt" or "innocence." They only consider appeals made on Constitutional issues.

[Botany]

5. If that happened

1. Fox News; Bill Clinton is at fault
2. CNN; Ned lamont behind false charges against the President
3. MSNBC; except for Keith O The war on terror makes the President make some tough choices
4. CBS w/ Katie; New Fall fashions that can go to work w/ you and go out at night too
5. Washington Post; Attack from the left threatens the President
6. New York Times; The Supreme Court rules might cause the President problems

[ayeshahaqqiqa]

6. If a tree falls in the forest, and no one hears,

does it make a sound? Of course. And these rulings will make a difference. People are waking up to the fact that the MSM doesn't report the news, and are looking for it elsewhere (like here and other places on the internet).