Terrorism and the Clinton Administration. Compared to Bush admin.

[eccles12]

WTC 1: used "legal" wiretaps, terrorists captured, tried, convicted, jailed, no war, no country invaded, no loss of 2600 US soldiers, no tens of billions wasted, no alerts to scare the wits out of people, no continous barrage of terror here, terror there, boo boo whoo.

Millineum terrorism: Totally prevented. No fanfare, little media attention, no lives lost, no war, no country invaded, no loss of 2600 US soldiers, no tens of billions wasted, no alerts to scare the wits out of people, no continous barrage of terror here, terror there, boo boo whoo.

They also left plenty of warnings about Al-qaeda and planned attacks on the US which the Bush administration promptly ignored.

Just something that came to my mind when I saw the former President WJC on TV.

[HysteryDiagnosis]

1. gw isn't fit to shine wc's shoes and more people know that

than are willing to admit it.

[acmejack]

2. Clinton was soft on terror!

He didn't illegally invade Countries which had absolutely no involvement with whatever it was that had the RW excited and get involved in an expensive drawn out militarily draining quagmire. He wasn't tough on the terrorists so they didn't respect him?

[DianaForRussFeingold]

3. You make a great point! Brilliant post!

:hi: Welcome to DU! :yourock: :kick:

[eccles12]

4. Thank you. Maybe Democrats ought to make more of a point about

this?