Mother,
I go to work every day on the Base to do my best at keeping the jets maintained and constantly improved. If I didn't support the troops, do you think I'd have ANY hand in this disgusting chapter of American history? I think the troops have gotten the rawest deal of all. They're sent to a place that doesn't want them...to do a job that can't be accomplished. Is that fair? I'd say I support the troops a lot more than someone who'd keep them over there indefinitely. I support them so much, I want them to stop dying for a so-called cause that can only be defined by abstractions that nobody really understands.
You Republicans need to learn that President Bush is NOT interchangeable with the troops. For one thing, like most of the Republican leadership, he's never seen even one day of combat. But he IS the military's Commander-in-Chief...and he's failing them every day that he leaves them in Iraq. Seriously, what is the FIRST thing you do when planning a mission? You set an OBJECTIVE. So what is the definition of victory in our current Iraq conflict? "When the Iraqis stand up, we'll stand down." BRILLIANT speechwriting. It really evokes a vision of the young patriots fighting for OUR country's independence from unjust rule. Except that the Iraqis only seem to want to stand up against the MILITARY PRESENCE that is fast transforming their country into a pile of rubble. You don't spread freedom or democracy by keeping a population prisoner in their own homes. That's how you stir up resentment and resistance. That's how you display for the whole world that you didn't put much thought into the war beyond Shock & Awe™. That's how you reveal your nation to be much more akin to King George's Britain than to George Washington's United States.
Republican pundits like to put the anti-war folks on the spot by asking, "Would you rather Saddam remain in power?" For the first year or two of the Iraq war (which I was against from the start), that question even gave me some pause. But now, at this point, I can say clearly and proudly that YES, I would rather see Saddam in power than see more than 2600 American families destroyed (not to mention over 40,000 Iraqi families -- they're brown, so they don't count) for a mission which has FAILED because the civilian leadership never even defined a goal -- and refuses to to do so TO THIS DAY. Adding insult to injury, the administration has openly shown their complete contempt for accountability of any kind -- $9 billion in Pentagon funds un-accounted-for by the year 2005 (
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5763483/).Wouldn't a responsible administration be DEMANDING answers about NINE BILLION dollars that had gone missing? And wouldn't a responsible media be doing everything it could to expose the widespread FRAUD that allowed this to happen and continue to this day? Odd...the TV constantly tells me who is sleeping with whom in Hollywood, but I can't seem to find the nasty liberal news channel that's investigating where all that taxpayer money went -- not to mention all the stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons that could have been launched on the USA in 45 minutes' time. I can't BELIEVE the media is so tough on Bush and his administration! Poor, poor!
How can anyone (even if it's just 35%) still believe anything this administration says? Remember when we were going to be greeted as liberators? I do. Remeber when Iraqi oil revenues were going to pay for the whole conflict? I do. Remember when Rumsfeld said "it could last a day...a week...a month...i doubt six months..."? I do. Remember when, according to Vice President Cheney, the insurgency was in its last throes? I remember when that was the case -- May of 2005. Golly, rigor mortis sure is slow setting in. You've seen Bush repeat "stay the course" until even HE has to be sick of hearing it. But now that election season comes around, he sends Ken Mehlman to the Sunday talk shows to say that the administration's policy isn't "stay the course," but rather "adapt to win." Well, I must've had something in my ears for the past 3 years, because I've heard "stay the course" every day and seen absolutely NO adaptation. Just plenty of sleazy politicians (on both sides -- a lot of spineless Dems supported this fiasco, too) denying the reality of the situation in order to save face. Good for them.
You know, Mom...you and Dad always prefer not to talk about such matters...as though it's harmful to discuss them. That kind of attitude works very well for an administration as bumbling and incompetent as this one. As long as we STOP OURSELVES making use of the 1st Amendment, they don't have to think up ways to convince us we don't need it. Instead, they can focus on the terrible threat of marriage between loving gay adults...or immigrants who come here to pick fruit and clean hotel rooms because they can't bear any longer watching their families live in dirt and shit in buckets. THOSE are the real threats we face as a nation -- fags and darkies. Other human beings who have hearts, and dreams, and families. I have to keep talking about these things, and I'm sorry you don't want to hear them -- because you're of the group who needs to hear them the most.
I could go on all night with this, but I need to be fresh for the Unit Compliance Inspection tomorrow. I just want to say again that I was very hurt and disappointed that you'd stoop low enough to pull an O'Rielly and tell me I don't give the troops any credit. That's either a dishonest or entirely misguided thing to say, just like when you accused Heath of anti-Semitism simply because he doesn't agree with everything Israel does in regards to the Palestinians. I hope maybe you just went on conservative autopilot and didn't really mean those things.
Could it simply be the goodness and hope in your heart that shields you from seeing this administration's profane levels of cynicism and contempt for the average person? I truly hope so, becasue I can't think of any other explanation that would allow for you to be the same kind and loving person who raised me to think like I do.
With much love,