Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Nation is the Most Anxious to Pop a Nuke?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:16 PM
Original message
Which Nation is the Most Anxious to Pop a Nuke?
Here's the list:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons

Russia? France? China? India or Pakistan? North Korea maybe? Or Iran? Israel perhaps?

Hmmmm, who could it be...?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you listen to Sean Hannity... it's us.
The Neo-cons seem more than eager to show our nuclear force.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. MY GOD !
This is depressing. It is obvious that we have a madman in the whitehouse. And these posts and post in other sites that are very similar to this show that most people (with brains) believe we are going to be nuking another country soon?!? WTF Get the son of a bitch outa there NOW! If there is indeed a chance that this is true just get him the hell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bushistan, by far
Why'd you leave them off the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perfect name for his world. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oops, did I forget to mention Uncle Sam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Israel
just wait and see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes the USA (under the influence of a cocaine addict)
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 04:21 PM by savemefromdumbya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pakistan Will Detonate the First Nuke Of The New Dark Ages
You watch ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. On India?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. in order of likelyhood
Pakistan
America
Israel
Iran
NK
India
China
Russia
England
France

if Pakistan does it, India will be 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I got my eye on the French.
That's two for Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. The neglected trouble spot
is India. There papers openly worry that America(showing its current ineptness in Bush/Condy "armistice" ham-handedness and favoritism) will be able or disinclined to stop the perennial blowups between them and pakistan(Bush ally). This is extremely bad. Bush I's diplomats narrowly averted a hot war. Today? It would likely be guaranteed, Powell out of the picture completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Put the UK at the bottom
the UK must ask technical permission of the US first. Their force isn't completely independent.

France will pop one on the country that attacks us or another European country in a 9/11 style. Chirac has made it clear. But it probably would be on a military base or vital infrastructure, not on a crowded capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Sadly, I Have To Agree
We are one assassination away from a real mess there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. My Real Guess? Syria Detonating a Pakastani Bomb in Israel
Or maybe a North Korean bomb, doesn't matter much which ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. no way
then the zionists would flatten damascus. asad isn't stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. what if they nuked their nukes first?
keeps you on your apocalyptic toes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. good thought
but rest assured, the US would have a shipment of nukes on the way before i could pronounce apocalyse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Good thought?
Please expound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. re:
I only say good thought to be constructive. i'm the most positive and constructive guy you'd ever meet. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Oh, c'mon
Mr. Constructive, you can do better than that cryptic little comment. If the thought of Israel being nuked is a good one to you, why not have the guts to admit it. If that's not what you meant, why not clear it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. re:
good thought can be interpreted as, "you have a point," and I meant it in that way. Just for the record: I don't want Israel to be nuked. I don't want nukes to be used at all by any country. Sorry for being cryptic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. self-delete
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 05:08 PM by cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. self-delete
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 05:07 PM by cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Thanks for clearing that
up. Glad to hear it. I'm with you. I don't want to see nukes used again ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. nukes
are so 50 years ago. i pray there aren't worse things to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. The Zionists?
Try the word "Israelis." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Zionists
I use Zionist just as I don't like to include all "Americans" as responsible for Repubs' actions. I have Israeli friends who wouldn't fight a lick for the actions of the Zionists... and they aren't just Muslim Arabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. But the hypothetical attack was on Israel...
...therefore the response would be "Israeli." Just like an attack on the US would be responded to by "Americans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elliswyatt Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. re:
point taken. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. not us
Halliburton makes more money when we just destroy everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The destroying and rebuilding biz is on the upswing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. that seems to be the primary foreign policy mdous operandi of the repukes
build

destroy

rebuild

redestroy . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. The United States of America?
That's my guess based on their track record!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Top 3?

1. Iran
2. Israel
3. United States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bush and his gang of armageddonists
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bushitler wants to put on his fake zipper freak suit and ride the
Little Fat Sister deliveree Gay Nola to SWAK so he can be remembered! That freak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. IMO In Order: Pakistan-They've been very close before...
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 05:38 PM by fujiyama
but Clinton did a good job of handling the crisis and having them step down. And of course, the threat of a coup is always present. As another said, if they're first, India is second.

North Korea - What do they have to lose? In a conflict with the US on the Korean peninsula, NK could...

Iran - How much does Ahmedenijad hate Israel? Would he risk his nation's population centers to kill many Israelis?

Israel - if they are cornered in any sense, they will undoubtadly use them.

Russia - they face threats of terrorism, but would they use nuclear weapons against the Chechens? They have certainly reacted quite brutally in the past with regards to them.

China - if a war with India or the US were to break out, then it's always a possibility.


Contrary to what most believe, I don't think the US is that likely to use nukes, even under Bush. Why bother? We have enough conventional weapons to do whatever damage we want. It's unecessary and as psychotic as this administration is, I don't see it happening just yet.

I don't think the other western nuclear powers are very likely to rely on nukes at this point.

But if there is any sort of nuclear terrorist attack on the US, it's possible...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. The US by far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. Pakistan.
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 07:23 PM by Odin2005
If Musharriff is assaninated and Taliban-types come to power Delhi will be turned into radioactive glass and we will have World War III on our hands. Indian Muslims will be massacred by Hindu Nationalists, angering other Muslim countries causing them to declare war on India. The Pakistani Fundies invade Afganistan, bringing NATO into the war. When NATO joins the war Middle Eastern states retaliate by invading Israel and Iraq. Israel nukes Mecca and Tehran, Pakistan nukes Tel Aviv, them the US nukes Islamabad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC