Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Mr. Raasch, I do not watch cable news, but thank you for asking!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:06 AM
Original message
No Mr. Raasch, I do not watch cable news, but thank you for asking!
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 06:56 AM by newyawker99
However, if you need to provide your readers with what my normal television viewing habits are – it includes shows like Lost, Sopranos, Project Runway and oddly enough MTV’s Pimp My Ride (boy does Mad Mike & gang do some crazy tricked out stuff). However, outside of an occasional Keith Olberman, I do not watch cable news.

To be honest, I survived years, perhaps decades without cable news. When cable started to expand, my parents stuck with the main 13 channels and when I moved out on my own struggling to get by on my single salary of very little, Cable was nothing more than a luxury that I couldn’t afford but didn’t really miss since I never had it. I figured there was plenty of news I could watch on the Network News and PBS, NPR in the car and perhaps the local newspaper left behind by someone in the office breakroom.

So when I moved in 2001, I pretty much decided it was time I would get some cable when I found the rabbit ears could only pick up one station and then just barely. And I started to watch cable news. But the news was nothing like I what I was use to with the Networks. Instead of 30 minutes to cram it all in there, the cable news stations had hours upon hours to rehash the same stuff over and over again, where it was killer sharks, killer bees or who killed Chandra Levy. I didn’t find this very interesting to watch and I stuck with my Network News (CBS btw, I’m a Dan Rather fan).

But like the rest of the world, I was glued to cable news during 9/11. I don’t think I turned my TV off once for that week after it happened and it was regular viewing in the months afterwards. We knew that bin Laden was behind these crimes and living in the mountains of Afghanistan. So I was definitely interested in watching cable news to see what our troops were doing in Afghanistan and if we had caught bin Laden yet.

But then cable news failed me and it failed us. On the turn of a dime, bin Laden was like yesterdays’ news and the Bush administration was ready to blame Iraq for 9/11 even though the terrorist groups were in Afghanistan, none of them were of Iraqi descent and it was a known fact that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were at odds with each other over style of government (Hussein was a secular government whereas bin Laden preferred more of a fundamentalist theocracy.) Cable news forgot all about Osama Bin Laden, our troops in Afghanistan but instead became the Bush administrations number #1 cheerleader for why we need to go to war in Iraq. Even when other countries were questioning the intelligence (and I use that word loosely) from the Bush Administration as to why this invasion was necessary, cable news treated everything like solid indisputable evidence.

And I was realizing that I didn’t care much for cable news. Newsreaders would present the story but with a slant towards the republican viewpoint. And the talking head shows – what a joke. O’Reilly, Hannity, Matthews and a host of other right-wing screeds editorialize the news and why I must believe it with no questions asked. I wasn’t getting the news from cable news, I was getting an opinion that I was suppose to accept without question and personally I find that offensive.

My opinions perhaps were harsh that day of the post I made which you quoted but re-reading them again I stand by most of them (BBC kept calling them ‘Asian’ which to this American means from Eastern Asia but perhaps to a Londoner means something else). Even MSNBC.com(1) reported that there was conflict over when the arrests were to be made, with London wishing to wait a bit longer until more evidence and perhaps even more suspects were rounded up whereas the US wanted to get this out right away. And ironically it happened right after Joe Lieberman lost and Dick Cheney went so far to “suggest that the ouster of Mr. Lieberman might encourage “al Qaeda types.” (2). I use to worry about those Orange Alerts until I realized that they always seemed to happen at strategic times when elections are nearing or perhaps a bad story is about to come out about the Bush administration. So color me cynical for questioning.

So there you have it, my confession that not only do I not watch cable news, but haven’t so for a very long time. I’ll stick with my NYTimes, WashPost, PBS and NPR thank you very much.

Sincerely
Cable News Boycotter
LynneSin

PS: I’m still ticked from my last airline flight when I found out I was going cross-country and the only food they were providing was overpriced snack boxes that they ran out of halfway through the cabin.

Footnotes:
1.)http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14320452/
2.)http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/10/washington/10senate.html?ex=1312862400&en=3509ffa426b27fda&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. i agree with you on the cable news
when ever someone in the family turns on cable news i go crazy...actually i leave the room till they get the hint or i`ll just keep saying "lies". if i want news i`ll go to link tv ,freespeach or i`ll watch telemundo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. who is Mr. Raasch and why did he ask you about cable news?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. This will clear it all up for you:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope you are going to send this
to USA Today. Great answer btw and recommended.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. 5th R
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 12:33 AM by Wonk
edit: Here's the link to the other thread started about this earlier in GD: P
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2779217&mesg_id=2779217
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. You know Lynne
Edited on Tue Aug-15-06 01:12 AM by IChing
great letter by the way


I was thinking from his writings:

"LynneSin must not watch much cable news"---meaning to limit you viewing of cable news
"LynneSin must not watch much cable news"---meaning you are not watching enough cable news

I go for the first one..

good letter.
Oh yes I nominated it and just for you


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Exceptional rant Lynne
I haven't had cable for 4 years and don't miss it a bit. I enjoy the entertainment value of passive entertainment/information that TV, especially cable provide, but I realize that it's like empty calories. It's only fulfilling if you don't pay much attention. I'd rather be actively engaged for entertainment and information gathering because it requires some effort.

To me that means reading. Reading requires you to be active in gaining knowledge. That active engagement use's a part of the brain that will provide better long term understanding of that information.

My best reccomendation....engage your brain and READ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
7.  The "plot" has disappeared from the news all together.
No bombs, no tickets, no money, nothing but a pile of unfinished bottles of backwashed $3.00 Fijis.

They are hoping that everybody will forget about it, just like the Sear Tower one (what Sears Tower one??). In a day or so the restrictions will all be lifted and it will be like it never happened. All that will be left is the stench left behind by mr rash or whatever his name is and the others like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. brilliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. k&r, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kicked!
You're famous, LynneSin! Give 'em hell!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't watch cable news much either.
I use to mind you. In the late nineties, the cable shows would divide the screen four ways and fill each quadrant with a talking head. Sort of a Hollywood squares for political pundintry. That was back in the Clinton Witchhunt days.

Hmm...I suddenly remembered why I stopped watching cable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Great response LynneSin.....
I hope Raasch reads it. I agree with everything you wrote and like you I don't watch cable news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. k&r. Excellent. I hope they print your responese, but I suspect they
won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I haven't sent it to him
I figured he's reading DU - he'll find it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Please, send a condensed version, not to him, but to the editors of
USA as your response to being quoted in their paper.

Hit the main point about cable news in the first paragraph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Honestly, I'm having fun today
But I really don't want to get into some debate with some little known columnist that had no name recognition here at DU until he popped my name into his column.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well, this is true: Raasch who?
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good Reply
That guy is an idiot. One post and he has it all figured out? Typical.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well said.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
Good response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. BOYCOTT GANNETT, Also!!
USA Today is owned by Gannett, I think.

And Gannett owns several newspapers and TV Stations: http://www.gannett.com/web/newspapers.htm and http://www.gannett.com/web/tvstations.htm

BOYCOTT ALL OF THEM!!!

You might want to make sure you send your WONDERFUL letter to Gannett Corporate HQ and include in it that you intend to BOYCOTT every newspaper and TV Station that Gannett owns (and wher Gannett carries out the vile wishes of the Bush Cabal/Regime!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. As I said, this letter is not being sent to USAToday or Gannett
Basically we're dealing with a no-name columnist who has had nary of a peep on the internets. I've said my piece and I'm sure Mr. Raasch or one of his cronies have read it (I mean they read my other posts), and will comment if necessary. I'm not interested in helping him boost his careers over my rantings on a internet discussion forum. And personally, I think DU had enough publicity for one day. I'm sure Skinner and Earlg are sitting in their office grimacing at the fact the post got in that column.

I've had my fun with my 15mins of fame. I have more important things to do than bother with this gnat.

And I have no desire to boycott Gannett. I like my local paper, which happens to be a Gannett Newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. so will USA Today publish this rebuttal?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. READ THE THREAD - NO!!!
Sorry, I just got done posting it.

I have no desire to get anymore involved than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. K and R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. CNN, MSNBC, and Fox "News" should be shut down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Call Congress!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. If not watching cable news is a crime, let me also be guilty! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Well said
"right-wing screeds" and not dealing with this "gnat". I like your use of the language much better than Chuckie's. AND, good choice not to play by submitting it - why dignify his salvo with anything more than a clarification as he obviously didn't quite understand your first post that he quoted.

:yourock:

I love that 'screeds' line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaggieSwanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. What a perfect and dignified response.
Mr Raasch, I DO hope you are reading this thread.

LynneSin, :yourock: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC