Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lie detector tests at our airports? Gotta love that Chertoff!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:42 PM
Original message
Lie detector tests at our airports? Gotta love that Chertoff!
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 02:46 PM by fooj
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115551793796934752-4C3OqblQ52Ufnr_74rHtRaJm00s_20070814.html?mod=blogs


Which Travelers Have 'Hostile Intent'?
Biometric Device May Have the Answer


By JONATHAN KARP and LAURA MECKLER
August 14, 2006; Page B1

At airport security checkpoints in Knoxville, Tenn. this summer, scores of departing passengers were chosen to step behind a curtain, sit in a metallic oval booth and don headphones.

With one hand inserted into a sensor that monitors physical responses, the travelers used the other hand to answer questions on a touch screen about their plans. A machine measured biometric responses -- blood pressure, pulse and sweat levels -- that then were analyzed by software. The idea was to ferret out U.S. officials who were carrying out carefully constructed but make-believe terrorist missions.

GE Security CEO Louis Parker demonstrates some of the company's airport screening devices.The trial of the Israeli-developed system represents an effort by the U.S. Transportation Security Administration to determine whether technology can spot passengers who have "hostile intent." In effect, the screening system attempts to mechanize Israel's vaunted airport-security process by using algorithms, artificial-intelligence software and polygraph principles.

Neither the TSA nor Suspect Detection Systems Ltd., the Israeli company, will discuss the Knoxville trial, whose primary goal was to uncover the designated bad guys, not to identify threats among real travelers. They won't even say what questions were asked of travelers, though the system is generally designed to measure physical responses to hot-button questions like "Are you planning to immigrate illegally?" or "Are you smuggling drugs."

<snip>

Wow. So much for "hating us for our FREEDOM"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thoughtcrime detector.
Your government wants to know what you are thinking. If they decide you're hiding your emotions for 'innocent' reasons, they may not arrest you. If they don't like what you're thinking, God help you. Next stop, Room 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please arrive 1-2 days before your scheduled flight...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am generally in an unpleasant mood when I'm in the airport, because
well, it sucks there.

Is that considered 'hostile intent'? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would imagine the hostile intent meter would need a very high
threshold before alerting because I suspect that your mood is the prevalent one these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excuse me, but why are we relying on technology
That is inadmissable in court? One that has been proven time and again to be faulty. A technology that can be easily beaten if one knows what they're doing?

Why are we now trying to peer into people's thoughts and emotions? Why are we performing such intrusive screening?

If all of this is to protect us from terrorists, I say give it up already, we've lost. We have given away so many civil liberities that our country would be unrecognizable to our founding fathers. Our government is becoming so intrusive that it is starting to make 1984 look like a beginners' manual.

Utterly stupid, incredibly intrusive, and this technology will not, cannot protect us. All that this technology does is strip away our civil liberties, and numbs the populace to the even more outrageous intrusions yet to come:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Slap it on teh Reeps (hell, dems too!) for all their speeches & debates.
Now THAT'S your tax dollars at work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lie detector tests for Politicians and their cronies!
Drug tests too for the same bunch. How can we take a chance with people having the power to start wars, lying, or being on dope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. kicked n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC