|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 11:41 AM Original message |
What would a Lieberman win mean for the two-party system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. Your way off track by sentence # 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Which is a total evasion of my entire post, but thanks for playing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
larrysh (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 11:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. If he is successful, mioght be the start of a viable third party..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LincolnMcGrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. So you admit your frame was incorrect now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I admit you didn't read my post, and didn't respond to it. Thanks for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
3. It would mean that all those folks who claim "third parties never win" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That 0.0000000001% winning percentage is hardly proof of anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. It would be proof that if people wanted third party candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. That argument is statistically incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. No, it would be proof. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 01:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. nothing but the attitude of voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. first of all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. It wouldn't mean anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
7. But he's not really a third party candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. He's pro-life, he won't get much overt Republican support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Questions on your questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
12. It would mean Joe would continue being Bush/Roves mole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. I think it then brings out the "Corporate Party" into the open... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 12:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. This isn't what I was hoping to learn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Perhaps exposing the "corporatists" will bring BACK our two party system.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
20. Lieberman IS the defacto Republican candidate in this race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
21. The idea of breaking out of a two-party system is the idea of new ideas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
22. Good questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Joe Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-14-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. The more choices the better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC