Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New talking point for GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:40 AM
Original message
New talking point for GOP
Look for "Adapt to Win" to be repeated about 10,000 times this week from GOP talking heads. They finally figured out that "Stay the course" won't fly. Now, according to Ken "Mulemouth" the choice is between cut and run or adapt to win. By the way does he or does he not look and act like Neidermeyer from Animal House??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, "change the course," as Russ Feingold's been saying...
...for a year?

:hi: goddess...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. actually this one was from goddess hubby
and I'll have to give him hell for posting it in breaking news instead of here ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. He said they were "adapting to win" by sending more troops to Baghdad
yeah, how's that working out so far, Meelyman?



:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. One would "hope" he doesn't suffer the same fate
as Niedermeyer, heh heh. "Course he'd have to enlist for that to happen. However would it be too evil to wish him the same punishment as Marmalard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6.  Did Mehlman NOT support the Repub candidate in Conn?
At least that was what I thought I saw. I thought he listed the candidates he did support and did not include either Lieberman nor the candidate of his party.

IMHO than means he supports Lieberman but because of party affiliation, he cannot endorse him.

If I read this right, Connecticut needs to know that Lieberman is supported by the Republic party. So, does this mean that Joe will join the Republic party if elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yup
It either means they support Lieberman or replacing Schlessinger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. neidermeyer
haha.........I hadn't noticed that before but I think you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secular Agent Man Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Any my talking point in response would be:
The Bush administration is "Too Inept to Win."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. Basic Definition of a "Flip Flop" Isn't it?
I think people should be reminded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. okay...if your "intelligent design" for victory is too...
...stupid to survive in the real world, then it becomes necessary to "evolve" another plan? How about: "Republicans: Adept at Whining"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Good catch...
He did repeat that phrase about a half dozen times. "Adapt to win"? Wht does it mean? We keep sending in more and more troops for a failed policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. They would have to adapt to win because so far they are Losers! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC