|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:25 AM Original message |
Mehlman says he won't work for CT Repuke candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. Mehlman is a fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
2. Houston, we have a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. and when a candidate won't support his own party, how can HE be trusted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The Republicans are supporting their candidate in Connecticut, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's right. He has been their candidate for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I agree that he was a DINO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. No, they have a candidate officially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
5. prolly he's signed a contract with Loserf*ck n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 10:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. they held on to the news of the bomb plot until after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
10. It's a "lose lose lose" situation for the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
11. Will Dems work for Lamont now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theanarch (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-13-06 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. there's another scenario here that bears some attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC