Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terrorist plot Fact thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:13 AM
Original message
Terrorist plot Fact thread
Edited on Fri Aug-11-06 10:17 AM by LSK
Ok, what do we know so far for sure?

The following seems to be common knowledge at this point:
The plotters were going to carry chemical explosives on carryon luggage hidden in common drink containers such as gatorade bottles to the airplane and "mix" them up and set them off with portable electronic devices disguised as mp3 players or watches or a car key fob or some combination of them.

The plot called for blowing up an unknown number of airplanes headed from the UK to the US over the Atlantic ocean.

The plotters were going to make a test run to see if they could get the chemicals aboard the airplane.

We know the plotters names:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4782343.stm

Two Britons were arrested in Pakistan:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4781925.stm

24 people are being held. The assets of 19 people were frozen.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4778889.stm

What else do we know for sure?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. 10 planes, 5 planes, now 20 planes? So far that's not fact!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. ok I change my OP to say an unknown number of planes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's all we're going to be told for "facts".
The rest of the story will begin with...."Once upon a time............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. One minor modificaiton might be in order...
set them off with portable electronic devices such as mp3 players or watches or a car key fob or some combination of them.

The BBC says:

detonators disguised as electronic equipment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4783141.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. changed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. im just trying to establish what is fact here
Edited on Fri Aug-11-06 10:18 AM by LSK
I dont want this to be a LIHOP/MIHOP flamefest. We had plenty of that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InaneAnanity Donating Member (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's known
Not an argument anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Apparently they had not yet bought plane tickets
but were only beginning to search flights (on the internets)?
I think that's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. i thought they had purchased tickets
Do we have any links confirming that they had or had not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It appears they had not.
The whole article is worth a read...
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20099061-601,00.html

Pakistan's military intelligence service also provided valuable information, and MI6, which deals with foreign security threats, consulted counter-intelligence agencies in Europe and northern Africa. US officials claimed yesterday that large sums of money were sent to leaders of the group from Pakistan to allow them to buy airline tickets.

British officials said several of the men had large sums of money in their bank accounts that could not be explained by their normal incomes.

Intelligence agents were adamant that the plotters had been within two days of conducting a test run to see if they could carry liquid explosives and detonating devices on to commercial fights to the US, and if they had succeeded, they would have quickly gone ahead with the mission itself.

There were conflicting reports on whether the plan was to destroy five, 10 or 12 jets, and whether they were to be brought down over US cities to maximise casualties or over the sea so that the method of explosion could not be detected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. how much do airline tickets cost??
I read somewhere they had jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Last-minute flights to the US... easily £1000 if not more.
So for a large number of people, it could be upwards of £10,000. Not a huge amount, but not small either, and certianly not explainable by a job if it showed up all at once. They must have had jobs, because as was stated earlier the amount(s) of money in the account(s) could not have been acounted for by their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. we are talking about that amount divided up by 24 people
24 People with "normal jobs" cannot save that much money?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Probably they could.
On the other hand, to rely on personal savings in order to finance this sort of thing might be rather risky. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. "test run" to see if they could get the stuff onto the planes?
Information is still coming in/being released. As Scotty says, ongoing investigation. But having it be 2 days of "test run" to see if could get stuff on plane gives more leeway on timing and buying tickets. Why buy tickets unless you knew you could get the stuff onto the plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. more red mercury?
talk about losing all rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. I still can't find if they actually had the explosive materials
Have they said? I saw pictures of the British police with laptops. Having portable electronic devices and insane ideas in one's head was not reason for arrest and imprisonment last time I checked. I haven't tested the law for quite some time, though... getting too old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I haven't seen any word on the explosives themselves. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. I don't have a link but 'British agent inside group'?
Is that a fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. We know that the chemists here have nixed the liquid idea.
or that if they were going to use liquid, it likely would have not worked.
Or so I've gathered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Do you have any linkage?
I'm a bit confused. If they planned on mixing the liquids on the plane, then I suppose they might have been able to bring them aboard separately, in a relatively safe fashion. But I know nothing about that sort of chemistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. there have been a few chemistry discussions in GD today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. No chemist here but
apparently anything volatile enough to do this with would have to be mixed with special equipment, and would probably detonate on its own (from jolting on an x-ray belt, for instance) before it got anywhere near the plane.

Search for ProfessorGAC, his posts have been most informative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Ah, yes. The GAC.
I know him well. Glad to see he's on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Any attempt at a factual constructive discourse is appreciated
and beneficial - thanks for the attempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
21. K&R to keep this visible.
Conspiracy speculation this is not. One important thing DU has been for me is a resource for credible data on incredible events. Lets keep this thread alive as an archive of good data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick
Did any of the plotters purchase tickets or have chemicals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC