My letter to ABC News after tonight's repeat portrayal "the Far Left".

Mugsy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Aug-09-06 07:40 PM
Original message

My letter to ABC News after tonight's repeat portrayal "the Far Left".

Once again, ABC's "World News Tonight" falsely portrayed the results of the Lieberman/Lamont primary in Connecticut, to where I felt compeled to send them a little letter:
----------------------------

I was seriously bothered by tonights comments on your "World News Tonight" regarding the victory of Ned Lamont over incumbent Joe Lieberman in Connecticut's Democratic Primary last Tuesday. I am still hearing the ridiculous meme being perpetuated that Lamont's win is somehow the result of "Left Wing extremists that seek to push the Party to the far Left." Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Senator Lieberman has earned a reputation as THE LEAST Democratic senator in the Democratic Party, constantly siding with the Republican Neo-Conservatives in Congress over his own Party, often going as far as to chastise his own Party for not acting more like Republicans. He simultaneously bashes Democrats that bash him and his campaign... just a small taste of the Neo-Conservative hypocrisy that Connecticut voters have grown to loath in their Senator.

The Democratic vote for Ned Lamont was a vote for a RETURN to more Democratic principles. A vote FOR PARTY UNITY and a REJECTION of the Bush Doctrine... the REAL extremist position in our country (war mongering, Constitutional violations, extreme fiscal irresponsibility, and just an overall nasty demeanor that has permiated the public at large - "That racist, sexist, homophobic xenophobia you smell... you're soaking in it!")

"Anti War" is NOT "the extreme Left position". 60% of all Americans now want an exit strategy for the imminent withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, so please stop referring to "the anti-war movement" as "the far Left" because it's patently false.

A key reason for the selection of Senator Lieberman as the 2000 Vice Presidential nominee was his party-splitting vote to impeach President Clinton in 1999, even chastising him on the Senate floor. Selecting Lieberman was mostly a maneuver to attract both Conservative voters and Democrats dismayed over President Clinton's behavior.

But to now listen to Senator Lieberman repeatedly defend President Bush for committing crimes and defending atrocities resulting from his policies, only serve to heighten Senator Lieberman's detachment from the core principles of the Democratic Party... regulation of government and industry for the betterment of society; whereas the Republican agenda is the exact opposite: regulating people for the benefit of government and industry).

It comes as no surprise that Senator Lieberman hasn't yet questioned WHY he received so many ringing Conservative endorsements, including several by some of the most radical extremists hate-mongers in the Republican Party:

o Sean Hannity, of "Hannity & Colmes" on Fox - Publicly endorsed Lieberman on his show and organized a fund-raiser in CT (link).
o Ann Coulter - "He needs to just come on over (to our side)." (link)
o Bill Kristol, Editor of "The Weekly Standard" - "Is it too soon to consider him for the Republican Vice Presidential nomination in 2008?" (link)
o Karl Rove - "Whatever we can do, we will do (for Lieberman)." (link)
o Tony Snow - "A vote for Lamont is a vote for another 9/11." (link)
o Tom Delay gave his support for Lieberman "over Lamont" (link)
o NYC Mayor Bloomberg says he would campaign for Lieberman if asked (link)
o James Guckert (aka Neo-Conservative male prostitute reporter Jeff Gannon) - "(JFK would) more than likely be sickened by its treatment of Sen. Joe Lieberman, one of the few in his party who takes the threat of Islamofacism seriously." - (link)

VP Dick Cheney, GOP Ringmaster Ken Mehlman and former WH Press Secretary McClellan also all praised Senator Lieberman. And Joe didn't earn that kiss from President Bush because he was an impartial Independent. Speaking of which, Senator Lieberman's decision not to support the Democratic nominee in Connecticut, but instead run as an Independent, should only further illustrate the same disloyalty to the Democratic Party that Connecticut voters recognized in Joe long ago and voted out Tuesday night.

Joe Lieberman was near the bottom of the pack in 2004, drawing a pathetic 2.5% of Democratic supporters NATION WIDE in the Democratic Primary, further illustrating that Senator Lieberman has been out of the Democratic mainstream for a very long time. And no one was blaming "bloggers" for his unpopularity back then, now were they?

And still Senator Lieberman can't understand why he is so vilified by voters in "his own Party". The Party didn't reject Joe... Joe rejected his Party... long ago. Please stop perpetuating the falsehood that Democrats are "split", "in disarray" or otherwise being usurped by a "radical minority". You are only doing the Republican's dirty work for them by perpetuating the myth that Democrats "are in disarray". They claim, "Democrats can't agree on anything". Of course, half of that "disarray" was frequently The Good Senator from Connecticut. Now with Joe now gone, I think you're going to see a lot less of that.