Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should "Independent" Lieberman be included in the debates?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:01 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should "Independent" Lieberman be included in the debates?
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:11 PM by WI_DEM
with Lamont and the GOP nominee? What exactly is this "Joe for CT" party anyway? tell the truth I think a legitamite party like the Libertarians and Greens would have more right to be included than some one-man party.

p.s.
on the other hand, it would be fun for Lamont to say "Oh, I don't mind debating two republicans."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure, why not? But if he gets in the debates...
all the minor party candidates get ot as well. That seems fair. Maybe they can all sit off to the side at the kiddie table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harry t Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. could be bad news
I hate to spoil the fun , but Lieberman losing could be bad for us. Since the vote was sooooo close, and since repukes know their guy cant win, Liebers 48% plus the repukes vote guarantees a Lamont loss in November. I hate to say it, but I think its true. Then Lieberman, with no ties and only malice towards democrats, will caucus with the repukes. Then WE LOSE> bleech !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. and you think all those 48% will stick with Joe?
the biggest political group in CT is Independents and even among them Bush has about a 30% approval rating and a big majority oppose the war--I think most Dems will come home to Lamont and he will get a majority of Independents too. Joe might run second since the GOP nominee is apparently pretty pathetic. But he will still take GOP votes away from Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Does the winner need to get a majority?
If there is no majority, would there be a run-off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. If there actually are minor-party candidates, let them in --
but not Joe! The Party of One can speak for itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. ONLY if all the other minority party candidates are included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think everyone should be included in the debates
it's only fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. No! Traditionally Third Party candidates are ignored.
Why make an exception for Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Perot wasn't in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. No
It would be a waste of time to put third party candidates in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Purely for comic relief... Sure!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lamont could ask if he were being tag teamed.
Or, isn't one republican enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC