Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looks like Condi is going to be the New Colin Powell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:13 AM
Original message
Looks like Condi is going to be the New Colin Powell
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 11:32 AM by blue2helix
The NeoCons need a fall guy (gal) to take the heat just like they did to Colin Powell. This news story (link below) about Condi disagreeing with Bush re Lebanon, might be a leak from a Condi staffer, who sees the writing on the wall, and wants to soften the coming blow to her reputation.

Am I starting to see a pattern here as to who is getting discarded?

No honor among-st thieves.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Bush_Rice_at_odds_over_Israeli_0808.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. A lover's spat with lives on the line...
If only there was a blue dress involved.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think there's a pattern here.
Once the folks with dark skin in the Bush Administration get through doing his dirty work for him, Bush has no need for them any longer.

Next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope this backfires n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. So do I. Condi and Colin (hmmm...another similarity) know a lot about
what goes on in the Bush Administration. I think both of them are very intelligent people, and I've never understood why they stood beside a man who has done so much to harm people. I always wrote it off to sheer greed, but I think there must be more to it than that.

Someday, Bush will bite off more than he can chew. And it just might be Condi who opens the door for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They may know, but they won't tell
"I've never understood why they stood beside a man who has done so much to harm people."

With Powell there were two reasons!

1. He was always trying to be a good "soldier", which while great for someone still wearing a uniform, does not work well when your job is to be the head diplomat.

2. It was rumored that Michael Powell may have been taking some under the table "gratuaties" while he was with the FCC. And Colin being the good father that he is was protecting his son, even if it did cost American and Iraqi lives.

I'm sure there are some skeletons in Condi's closet as well, not sure what, but you can bet that Karl and Dick have their hands in all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. *ding* *ding* *ding*
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:58 PM by DesertedRose
I cannot for the life of me understand why ANY minority would vote Republican. Honestly. Alberto Gonzales, same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. I noticed/heard on the radio a deputy chief from her office is actually
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 11:18 AM by mtnester
Lebanon trying to negotiate..not her..I thought that was strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does that mean she's going to
use forged documents to try to justify an immoral and unnecessary war to the UN security council?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It just means that she is expendable n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad they already picked a new NFL commissioner. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Her reputation? You mean as Georgie's butt girl?
Monica with brains? Aunt Tomasina? Latter-day countess Potemkin?

That reputation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. See also a piece by a recent British press secretary in the Foreign Office
The article is about the rumours that the Bush admin told Tony Blair to fire Jack Straw from being Foreign Secretary in May. It was wondered about at the time, but a piece in the right wing magazine The Spectator a few days ago by Irwin Seltzer, neo-con and Rupert Murdoch's right had man, has given new credence to the rumours - because he's on the side of the neocons. The article is very much on Straw's side, but the author doesn't think Rice was behind the pressure from Washington, but the 'crazies' - and Straw and Rice seem to get on very well together (it was actually becoming a bit of a running joke - their tours of each other's "home patch" looked a bit like taking a boy/girlfiend to see your home town, and meet the parents), so this might be right about Rice's attitude:

One of the most interesting things I did as Jack Straw's press secretary was to arrange the meeting between some of his Muslim constituents and Condoleezza Rice. That day in Blackburn last March came to mind when I saw the extraordinary suggestion that Straw might have been removed from the Foreign Office because the US administration thought he was too influenced by Muslim opinion in the town.
...
Stelzer implies in his Spectator piece that Rice was surprised to find the then foreign secretary representing so many Muslims - it was, he claims, "something Secretary of State Rice noticed on her visit to Jack Straw's constituency".

Rice didn't "notice" it. She knew all about it in advance. I organised that visit, and did two joint planning exercises in Blackburn with her team, who showed her my notes on what to expect. They agreed that she would visit a mosque and wear a headscarf. The idea that she simply happened upon Blackburn's Muslim population is cretinous.

I can't speak for Rice, but my impression is that she relished the prospect of seeing what it is was like for the British foreign secretary to represent thousands of Muslims. She seemed to me open, interested and large-minded in a way the fruitcake cheerleaders of neoconservatism couldn't imagine.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1839938,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. holding hands the same way with both Colin and Jack--before kicking them
out the door--she's made her f------g bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. No surprise, the entire purview of the State Department is antithetical...
to Bush administration goals. Diplomacy is, after all, for sissies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good Point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. Shot flame torture me if you want
But you guy not seeing danger.
The UN resolution if veto by US
With set whole region ablaze.

Cause then ARAB LEAGUE force to take action to solve it.
That means likely WAR declare on Isreal by them.
They being edge on and on and on
Isreal annoucing more ground offensive for another 30 days.

It is bush solution to all his problems
Why delay till primary result.
Why until now.
You know hole is deep.
Now he dig bigger deeper hole.

Bithing can do but watch now :(
Damn no time congress and senate in recess.
There is noway US not get drag in
Troops in Iraq
Gee more bombing just to make sure all nice and ripe.

China now hey involve trying to solve thing..... CHINA
Yeah yeah spin say trying to build PR in middle east.
Or do they know stake went through roof.
That way inevitable if US veto
Maybe Chirac think hey let has live new conference on this all for fun.
Yeah 100 British MP say recall parliment.
So many sign
But me see to late cause get caught up in Lamont/Liberman fight.
All flying under radar.
Dumb Dumb me grrrrrr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Reason for Lebanon attack is to tempt Arab states into attacking
The reason for the recent Lebanon attack is to tempt Arab states into attacking Israel/US. This Will then be an excuse for the NeoCons to invade Syria/Iran.

This is the tricky part

1) NeoCons know that Democratic Congress will change everything and maybe even result in Criminal charges.

2) NeoCons know that if Arab states attack Israel or US before 2006 Congressional election, then they can use "National Security" and Blind Nationalism to consolidate power. So THEY WANT an Arab State to attack!

3) This is a race - Will Democrats take control of Congress BEFORE the NeoCons trick someone into attacking and foil all plans for a Democratic Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Doh ARAB LEAGUE is 22 countries strong.
This like 1967 but worse.

Time run out

UN vote soon on resolution
If US veto
need petition UN general Assembly to act.
Dont let Arab League to be force to declare war.

Must have ceasefire

World going crazy damn.

UN to vote wedesday so little time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Monica Lewinsky
would be a better secretary of state than she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hahahahahaha
Take that you warmongering piece of lying scum.


Those of us following this noticed the change in tone since Lebanon's Siniora told her not to come back without a ceasefire - the arrogant confidence is gone. They should all be sent to the Hague - Powell too.
Fugg all of Bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. I still think they're trying to prep her to be the GOP candidate in '08
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 11:48 AM by GloriaSmith
For the GOP, the only thing worse than a minority female candidate running for office is Sen. Hillary Clinton.

I bet we'll see a lot more faux "tension" between Rice and Bush...especially once the mid-terms are over. Since Bush's poll numbers can't seem to climb past 36%, the next GOP POTUS candidate will have to find ways to separate her/himself from him. If Rice gets chosen, they can keep the neocons in power while also claiming to deserve the minority vote and splitting the female vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I agree. This is b.s. from the right. They want to distance her from
her "husband" so they can promote her later. DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING THEY SAY. She is propoganda to try to make her look like a moderate!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Condi has been a member of the bush family far too long
to be discarded and she is a dependant child, so, she isn't going far from home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Randi just made this point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC