Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Louise Slaughter:Connecticut Primary = End of Rubber Stamp Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 09:36 AM
Original message
Louise Slaughter:Connecticut Primary = End of Rubber Stamp Congress
The American people spoke loud and clear yesterday in Connecticut, and we need to make sure their voices are heard from coast to coast.

Last night's results in Connecticut should make it clear to everyone in Washington that Americans are tired of an Administration that is contemptuous of Congressional oversight of the Executive Branch. They are tired of an Administration that accuses those who would question it of giving aid and comfort to terrorists. And they are tired of a White House that disregards the checks and balances our nation was built on.

Since George W. Bush has been in charge of the executive branch, the Republican controlled Congress has completely failed to conduct a host of constitutionally-mandated oversight activities, allowing a culture corruption and cronyism to take root in Washington and endangering the checks and balances fundamental to our system of government.


Here are just two brief examples of the Republican lead Rubber Stamp Congress:

ZERO CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT: Despite numerous reports that the Bush Administration has bent and broken the rules in a number of different federal agencies, the Republican controlled Congress has shown no interest in investigating them. "Back in the mid-1990s, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives ...logged 140 hours of sworn testimony into whether former president Bill Clinton had used the White House Christmas card list to identify potential Democratic donors. In the past two years, a House committee has managed to take only 12 hours of sworn testimony about the abuse of prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison." .

BLANK CHECK ON IRAQ: During the three years it has been writing the checks for the Iraq War, Congress has never asked the Bush Administration for a real accounting of how it has spent this enormous sum of money. What we do know from press accounts and some internal investigations is that the Bush Administration has squandered billions of taxpayers' dollars on fraudulent contracts, waste, and dubious public relations projects. We also know that billions of dollars of Iraqi funds have totally disappeared. In the polite phrasing of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), for example, the Department of Defense has currently "lost visibility" on more than $7 billion in funds appropriated for the global war on terrorism. .

Voters in Connecticut just sent a message that it is time for Congress to stand up to an Administration that does little more than tell us to 'stay the course.'

The American people want a Congress that will stop acting like a rubber stamp, and start doing its job, a Congress that will start exercising its constitutional authority to check an Administration intent on drastically expanding its powers at the expense of the House and the Senate - and ultimately the American people.

It is time for a Congress that will take this country in a new direction and provide America with real safety and real security

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/8/9/91833/38514
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is what i see the point of leiberman loss is. not his few bush
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 09:39 AM by seabeyond
supporting votes. the majority of his voting is the left. why i feel leiberman needed to lose is this. this was his infraction. and i am a moderate who supported the democrats outing leiberman even though i dont think we should vote on one issue but look at record as a whole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. DING DING DING!!! It's NOT an "anti-war". It is FOR Change!!!
The Status Quo is no longer an option. Vote for Change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Rubber-Stamp Republicans". . ."Rubber-Stamp Republicans". . .
how about THAT for a frame?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC