You know what? He's WORSE than Bush.

[Pale Blue Dot]

He's our Judus. Kissing us while he slaughters our children.

CT voters will see through this. Lamont will be the junior Senator from CT.

[movonne]

1. I just really dislike this man....he is a miserable little twit...

[smtpgirl]

3. Gore lost because of him

Hearing that voice just brings me shivers, bad shivers.

Now we know why that ticket was wrong, all wrong.

Edwards or Clark would have been a better choice.

I'm hedging more towards Clark. Never in a million years would I think I would agree with retired military brass!!

But I agree with my sister's father-in-law, retired Commander in the Navy, an attorney I might add, He is now a pure Democrat

[BushOut06]

8. Gore lost? When did that happen?

Gore did NOT lose because of Lieberman. He WON despite him. If it weren't for Rove and his tactics, Gore would still be in the WH.

[smtpgirl]

12. Rove was the only cog in that machine???

I seriously doubt it, there were many others, maybe others from the Democratic ticket.

How many others were "greased", you will never know

[lonestarnot]

16. Gore did NOT loose!

[aquart]

2. Let's see. He isn't endorsing the winning candidate.

He's running against the Democratic winner. Is Lieberman still considered a Democrat? I don't mean this philosophically, I mean in terms of office space, committee ranking, funding, and invitations.

[deadparrot]

4. Does anyone knows what the picture will look like in the 3-way general?

Assuming Lieberman continues his (I) run, would he be more likely to split with the Republican nominee to give Lamont the win, or vica versa? Or would he be the current frontrunner?

In any case, I wish Mr. Lamont the best of in November! :hi:

[Pale Blue Dot]

5. Last poll that measured this had Lamont 40% Lieberman 40% Repub 18%

That same poll had Lamont winning 51-48....

[deadparrot]

7. Cool. Thanks for the info, Finnfan.

:hi:

[Nikki Stone 1]

10. That was a good poll. Who did it?

Thanks

[Pale Blue Dot]

11. Rasmussen.

www.rasmussenreports.com

[Nikki Stone 1]

15. Thanks. This poll explains why Lieberman is going indy

He figures he'll squeak a win.

[Imagevision]

6. No-one is worse then Bush, Bush already killed over 200,000 iraqi

civilians

[Pale Blue Dot]

9. ...which Lieberman, supposedly a Democrat, wholeheartedly endorses.

Who's worse, your enemy, or your "friend" who helps your enemy beat you up?

[KingFlorez]

13. This is getting ridiculous

How can he be worse than Bush? The man who cheated to get into officed, failed to prevent a devastating terrorists attack and ignored thousands of people to be hungry and despair during hurricane Katrina. I don't care if he did vote for the war, he's nowhere near as bad Bush.

[napi21]

14. No he's NOT! Not even close! I really can't think of any politician

worse than Shrub! I remember tham all the way back to harry Truman, and NONE were worse than Shrub is now!