Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Political Landscape Just Shifted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:04 PM
Original message
The Political Landscape Just Shifted
It may be too early to say this, and I may rue saying it, but I believe Lamont's win really does signify a shift in the political landscape. I don't have the vaguest how big this shift if, but I'll go out on a limb and suggest that it's pretty damned significant, and does indeed have national implications.

What does it say?

It says, chiefly, that people are profoundly dissatisfied with the status quo, and that bodes well for November!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's let the little chickies get out of their eggs first...
then we can do the dissecting. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:08 PM
Original message
I know, I know
I'm a little ahead of myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also a lot of repugs will be looking at the turn out and the ant-Bush
voters... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep replugs will cut and run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I said that to my wife about 2 hours ago the same thing.
If Lamont wins all of them will see the writing on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Bullshit.
Middle America (I live here) is pissed off at this president and this war. See +50% of the people.

Ned Lamont is the mainstream, not just of the Dem party, but of America.

What part of free Iraqi's burning American flags in Baghdad makes us safer? Their people have spoken. And they hate us. There is only one sane course of action. Ned Lamont knows it. The American people know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. NO good Dems will quit the party over Lamont.
He's against the Iraq war but is hardly "far left."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Forget it
BS went from thinking of "considering giving up on the party" to "going to switch parties in November" in the space of 5 minutes. And somewhere in between managed a huffy show of umbrage over the phrase "dink town" (as in Podunk) as a Chinese slur. He's a visitor from another world, just passing through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's fun to play with them for a while....
(I learned everything I know about hunting from my cat.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yeah, right. Go play.
Spelling errors... check.
Lack of punctuation... check.
Low post count... check.
Complete lack of any sense... check.

Hmmmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yepper.
Within the Democratic Party, especially. With this win, Dean wins a battle(not the war) and the beltway boneheads will lose a great amount of currency.

Even if Lamont loses, that holds. File under "tectonic shifts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I say that whether or not Lamont wins the landscape has changed.
They all know that they can be vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's called taking the Democratic party back....
Edited on Tue Aug-08-06 08:09 PM by Reckon
Edit: Next is the Country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hope you`re right, cali.
I`ve been waiting for a sign, a smidgeon, a tiny speck, ANYTHING! Maybe this is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did Lieberman concede already?
Please don't jump the gun yet - I'm a CT resident and a natural pessimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Good morning, Jeff
Looks like I didn't jump the gun. Yay. The political landscape looks a lot brighter this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. You speak too soon, I fear
No one will know the future. The course of history has abruptly changed many times due to "unforeseen" events. We can only offer guesstimates.

I'm sure some corporatists want another Reichstag fire to accomplish what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is just the first whiff of smoke
Of a fire that will rage across this nation. Its time to burn the trash and we're just seeing the fire get lit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dead on cali
this bodes very well for November.

Having said that, we all still have tons of work to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. The media
the punditocracy, and the Beltway insiders may come to regret nationalizing this election. Perceptions that it's a tectonic shift will be due in no small part to their Cassandra wailing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cali, I agree with you.
There is something very symbolic about this particular race, and everyone seems to have understood that. It's about the old ways, cronyism, corruption, war mongering = Lieberman.

Then there's a new approach, gutsy, principled, doing the right thing = Lamont.

This is the reason why this race has been so publicized. Earlier in the week, there was a thread entitled, "Lamont win = the beginning of the end to the war in Iraq". When I saw that headline, I was just stunned. Had to sit back for a while and just think about it.

THAT's why they've been protecting Lieberman. It's all about the war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. It says ignore the viewsof your
constituents at your peril because party headquarters cannot control the blogs and people are seething with anger at the establishment and their special interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. it tells these elected reps to REPRESENT THE PEOPLE
seems like such a hard lesson for them to learn these days, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. This election will be anti-incumbent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC