WTIC: 2% in, Lamont 60%, Lieberman 40%, meaningless...

[johnfunk]

... but boy, doesn't it sound shweeeeet!

[WilliamPitt]

1. 20 points

means not one city is close to reporting.

Is nice to see, tho.

[Rose Siding]

2. I wonder if those are absentees? Hardblogger says they were low-

snip>
We noted in our story last week Lieberman’s affinity for older folks and theirs for him. Our Waterbury source said, “Some of the senior citizen buildings (in Waterbury) are not voting too well at all.”

He noted later that traditionally Waterbury has about 1,000 absentee ballots, many of them cast by elderly people. His sources tell him today they will have less than 400. Another troubling sign for Lieberman—even though the Waterbury absentee votes are breaking heavily for Lieberman, there aren’t enough to provide much comfort.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14230700/

[napi21]

3. cspan jsut announced that too, but cautioned that it depends on

what part of the State those votes came from.

[TlalocW]

4. I tried reloading a page with election results

It was 29 or 757 precincts reporting, which is 4%, and it was still 60 to 40.

I have a feeling that site is going to get slammed and maybe suffer the same fate as Joe's site, and when it does, he can accuse Lamont of not wanting web surfers to see the results.

TlalocW

[CountAllVotes]

5. 2 to 1 on the OFFICIAL ELECTION SITE (Lamont ahead!)

:D

http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenCountyView.aspx?Parameter=08/08/2006-Primary