Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From April 2006: BP ignored "dangerous condition". of Alaskan pipeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 02:35 PM
Original message
From April 2006: BP ignored "dangerous condition". of Alaskan pipeline
Edited on Tue Aug-08-06 02:36 PM by gatorboy
Financial Times
April 17, 2006

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/41ab9bee-cd75-11da-afcd-0000779e2340.html

BP staff feared for safety
By Sheila McNulty in Houston
Published: April 16 2006 22:02 |
Last updated: April 16 2006 22:02

A safety audit of BP's biggest refinery, obtained by the Financial
Times, reveals the UK oil giant deferred maintenance and delayed
repairs to the extent that staffers concluded equipment was in a
"dangerous condition".

The views in that 2005 audit  conducted by an independent
consultancy  echoed those of BP staffers as far away as Alaska, who
have warned for four years that staff and the environment were at
significant risk, as accidents continued unabated.

In the past year, both locations have experienced severe accidents.
The audited refinery in Texas City exploded in 2005, killing 15
people and injuring an estimated 500 in the deadliest refinery
accident for more than a decade. Last month, BP Alaska suffered the
biggest-ever oil spill at Prudhoe Bay, North America's largest oil
field. There was at least one other leak last week.

That BP operations in Texas and Alaska have suffered such significant
lapses, amid employee complaints about safety, supports the US
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, an independent
federal agency charged with investigating industrial chemical
accidents, in questioning BP's safety culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. They had to wait for the right time............
to shut it down. With oil at record price levels, NOW is the "right" time. :grr: This will drive up the price even higher so they won't lose a nickel while the pipeline is down. All on the American consumer's dime. Thanks, Big Oil! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. BP is just barely scraping by
You can't expect them to do maintenance on their own pipeline, can you? You heartless, communistic socialistic bastards always expect oil companies to foot their own bills, don't you?

"BP's financial performance has never been better, thanks to sky-high oil prices. The company earned a record $7.27 billion in its second quarter, 30 percent more than a year earlier, and had net profit of $12.9 billion in the first half of 2006." Source: http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/25/business/BP.php

What would BP's profits be if they'd had to fix their own pipeline? I'll bet you never considered the impact it would have on the CEO's benefit package did you? Not for one second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're right.
Posting this was pretty selfish of me. I demand a raise in my gas price just to sooth their pain. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC