Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When did the kingdom of heaven become a red state? (Good book review)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:50 AM
Original message
When did the kingdom of heaven become a red state? (Good book review)
From within the Evangelical movement, an academic decries the religious right's hold on US churches.

By Jane Lampman
Randall Balmer is a lifelong Evangelical, and he feels his faith has been hijacked.
In his latest book, Thy Kingdom Come: An Evangelical's Lament, the historian of American religion at Columbia University's Barnard College takes direct aim at the perpetrator: the religious right.


THY KINGDOM COME: An Evangelical's Lament
By Randall Balmer
Basic Books
242 pp., $24.95

An insider in the Evangelical subculture - and a long-time editor for Christianity Today - Balmer has had a ringside seat on the rising clout of Christian conservatives. He has sat in on meetings of leaders of the right. He's traveled the country listening to preachers in the pulpit. He's researched the links between conservative initiatives and theocratic ideology. And he has determined that the thrust of that movement is both a betrayal of his beloved faith and a threat to the democratic nature of America. In this admittedly emotional work - he calls himself "a jilted lover" - the author doesn't mince words.

"ight-wing zealots have distorted the gospel of Jesus Christ, defaulted on the noble legacy of 19th-century evangelical activism, and failed to appreciate the genius of the First Amendment," he says. What the Religious Right hankers for is "the kind of homogeneous theocracy that the Puritans tried to establish." Balmer yearns for progressive 19th-century activism, which pursued the abolition of slavery and other societal ills and - most important - did not seek political power. Suggesting his dismay is shared by many other Evangelicals, the author is upfront about being a Democrat and a liberal. He defends liberalism and its contributions to American society. Such leanings may lead some readers to dismiss the book as a disgruntled polemic from the left. Yet his credentials as a person of faith and a historian are more to the point here. (One of his acclaimed books, "Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory," a history of Evangelicalism, was made into a three-part documentary for PBS.)

Balmer provides a short historical sketch of the faith before analyzing the religious right and its chosen issues through the lenses of religious conviction and deep love for America. He warns that much more is at stake than meets the eye.

In a trip through east Texas - where it's been said there are more Baptists than people - he brings poignant humor to a discussion of the way conservatives have upended historical Baptist teachings. Baptist devotion to freedom of conscience, starting with Roger Williams in the 17th century, has long been credited with laying the groundwork for religious liberty and separation of church and state in America. Yet today, Balmer points out, some Baptists are battling the First Amendment in a bid to make America "a Christian nation." Traveling from the Houston airport to a rally in Longview, he reels off the names of dozens of Baptist churches he passes en route. "Given all of these churches, given all of these angry voices defending the faith on my car radio," he writes, "imagine my surprise that evening when I attended a huge Religious Right rally ... and learned that, despite all appearance to the contrary, East Texas is actually in the grip of Satan." Balmer often argues as passionately as an Old Testament prophet. As only a fellow Evangelical could do, he criticizes "the ruse of selective literalism," by which those who insist on an inerrant Bible obsess over certain issues while deemphasizing others, such as divorce. Given their fervent stances on abortion and homosexuality, he says, "My question to the Religious Right is this: If you are serious about your professed commitment to biblical literalism, why are you not working to outlaw divorce? ... To make it illegal, except in cases of marital infidelity."

more:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0808/p16s01-bogn.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "he reels off the names of dozens of Baptist churches he passes en route"
Yeah, and I can see plenty of McDonald's along my way to work ... when I really want spaghetti ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC