ARGH!!! WHY is a Republican Strategist doing the commentary

[Norquist Nemesis]

explaining all about "what it means" if Lieberman loses(wins)??? WHY???

:argh:

Oh, and it's official! Roger Stone, the Republican Stragetist, just told America that Hillary Clinton IS running for office. He has apparently seen her completed entry form complete with signatures! :sarcasm:

[DODI]

1. The Dem strategist they had on before that was Goldstein,

the lobbyist who disrupted Ned's appearance in Meriden last week. I think I am going to stop watching MSNBC.

[OwnedByFerrets]

2. Dont stop watching KO.

He is the way and the light. ;)

[DODI]

4. I would not abandon Keith -- I am just not going to

watch the coverage today. Chris is driving me nuts -- on our local coverage he sounds rather pro-Lamont -- but on MSNBC -- he does not. Last night my 8 year old put Keith on all by himself! He watches it every night.

[SheilaT]

3. I seem to recall

equally confident statements that Hillary was running for president two years ago.

[zbdent]

7. I thought that was in 1991 ...

[SheilaT]

8. Can't tell if you're

simply teasing me or what No, I'm referring to the confident claims in 2004 that Hillary had filed to run for President.

And if you are teasing me, a quick grin back at ya.

[zbdent]

9. Not teasing ...

Republicans have always claimed that Hillary was gunning for the presidency ... they used her as a scare tactic for all their constituents who were afraid of a strong, working woman (I mean, how many women with strong careers really have time to make up their own chocolate chip cookie recipe? Of course, grannies who simply adore their grandchildres, a la Barbara Bush, make them from scratch ... a dig at "working mom" Hillary ... and when 1996 rolls around, the Repuke-started "bake-off" is less of an issue for "never any kids" Liddy Dole ... and when 2000 came around, Laura didn't have a "chocolate chip cookie" recipe, she had ginger snaps ... again, Repukes changing the rules to fit the game as they want it)

I was going to say "since 1998", but then I remembered the scare tactics they always used ... "You vote for one, you get both" and the "co-presidency" and such ...

:eyes:

[SheilaT]

10. Oh, okay.

Now I'm with you.

As a stay at home mom who LOVES baking chocolate chip cookies, and who claims to make the best ones ever, I thought the chocolate chip cookie recipe thing to be a lot of hogwash. Those of us who like baking cookies will do so. Those who don't, have nothing to be ashamed of.

I wasn't interested in going to law school or medical school or any other serious profession in my youth. I admire women who do so, and it absolute infuriates me that there's no real support for working mothers out there. Or working dads, I suppose. Way too many jobs assume you don't have any outside obligations or commitments, and THAT'S what's destroying families, not the fact of working mothers or single mothers or liberals or any such crap.

And besides, no matter who we vote for officially, the spouse is always part of the deal, no matter what she's like, what she does while hubby is in office. Such hypocrisy!

[SheilaT]

11. Oh, okay.

Now I'm with you.

As a stay at home mom who LOVES baking chocolate chip cookies, and who claims to make the best ones ever, I thought the chocolate chip cookie recipe thing to be a lot of hogwash. Those of us who like baking cookies will do so. Those who don't, have nothing to be ashamed of.

I wasn't interested in going to law school or medical school or any other serious profession in my youth. I admire women who do so, and it absolute infuriates me that there's no real support for working mothers out there. Or working dads, I suppose. Way too many jobs assume you don't have any outside obligations or commitments, and THAT'S what's destroying families, not the fact of working mothers or single mothers or liberals or any such crap.

And besides, no matter who we vote for officially, the spouse is always part of the deal, no matter what she's like, what she does while hubby is in office. Such hypocrisy!

[undeterred]

5. Because Lieberman is a Republican?

[Shipwack]

6. What is it with this "Hillary" thing?

I argued with some people at work last month over this... They -knew- that she had declared she was running for president. It didn't matter that I pointed out that google news had no such mention anywhere, let alone her personal website. They all had this mass psychosis that they had heard it straight from her mouth. :eyes:

[bluethruandthru]

12. I'm so hoping that Hilary doesn't run....

just because I'd love to rub it in the faces of all the repukes who've been calling her the Democratic frontrunner for years!!! It would absolutely devastate Chris Matthews who obsesses about her. He went through a phase where he asked every guest (no matter what the subject) what they thought of Hilary candidacy!