Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New 401K Rules Everyone should know about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 10:54 AM
Original message
New 401K Rules Everyone should know about
Since their social security plans went bust I suppose this is the next best thing.

Automatic enrollment: At companies offering a traditional pension, employees are generally automatically enrolled. But 401(k) plans typically require new employees to sign up, which can be a tough sell for younger or lower-paid workers. There are 12.1 million people in the U.S. eligible for workplace retirement plans who don't participate, according to the nonprofit, nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute.

In fact, many states bar companies from taking money out of an employee's paycheck without written consent. It is a leftover law from the bad old days when unscrupulous employers would force employees to buy things like food or clothing from a company-owned store at extortionist prices, says Fred Reish, an attorney specializing in retirement-plan law.

The pension-reform bill changes that, allowing automatic enrollment. Employees can opt out of the plan, but retirement experts say that once people are in a plan, they are likely to stay put simply out of inertia. The idea, says Christopher Jones of investment-advisory firm Financial Engines, is to "flip inertia from being a force of evil into a force of good."

With automatic enrollment, participation in 401(k) plans could jump from 66% of eligible employees to about 92%, according to estimates done by EBRI and the mutual-fund industry's trade group, the Investment Company Institute.

Automatic increases: To address the problem of employees not saving enough for retirement, the new law makes it easier for companies to automatically increase the percentage of an employee's salary that is directed to the plan.
---

Advice: The most controversial aspect of the 401(k) plan makeover is the provision letting companies offer specific investment advice. Under the rules, specific investment recommendations can be given if they are based on a computer model that must be certified as bias-free by an independent third party.


Independent third party? I wonder how one goes about finding one of those.


http://www.prudentbear.com/bearschat/bbs_read.asp?mid=428747&tid=428747&fid=1&start=1&sr=1&sb=1&snsa=A#M428747
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. The buzz words "nonprofit, nonpartisan" means GOP
Just so you know where the advice is coming from. If you already didn't guess from their statement it is good that the employers take employees money without their request.

I do not trust this new pension bill. So far everything I have read about it makes it appear to be bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is another scam on American workers....
chickens guarding the henhouse as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes another scam, an a big one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. er...maybe you mean foxes guarding the henhouse? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. maybe....LOL
I'm rather out of it this morning, I think I'd better give it a break.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Chickenhawk, foxes, chickens... It's a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. The goal is to get 90% or more 401k enrollment to get more money for
Wall-street to spend. That was also the motive behind the SS privatization scam. More $$$ in the system will rise stock prices & make those already holding them richer when they dump them.

As far as companies giving investment advice - they mean like Enron told their workers to buy company stock while they knew it was going south?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Does WalMart offer 401K plans?
I would hate to see this scam being pulled over on the poor cashier who may need every nickel WalMart doles out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. A Wal-Mart Manger told me there was some sort of automatic savings plan
I did not press for details, we were unwinding after a long day MCing, so take it with salt as needed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Automatic savings plan?
Like the employees make enough they can afford to save anything, or is this to pay for medical coverage that Wamart doesn't cover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Automatic Enrollment Is Nothing New
companies send out a notice, or review in Orientation that they have automatic enrollment, and if employees do not actively decline by the deadline, they are considered to have consented to the enrollment.

I'm not saying it is a good thing, just that it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. for pensions yes. But most states forbid employees from taking
Edited on Mon Aug-07-06 11:24 AM by Chimichurri
money out of paychecks without consent this includes 401Ks. This new law changes that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. I read this morning Sen. Levin is for it
and Stabenow. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is a good idea, IMO.
If you can get $19,000 in your 401(k) by the time you're 25, and your 401(k) grows at the historical rate the stock market has, you could quit saving at 25 and still retire a millionaire.

If the employer matches 50%, you only need to save $12,666 by the time you're 25. That's $151 a month from your 18th birthday til your 25th birthday to retire as a millionaire at 67. And of course, if you keep saving throughout your 20s and 30s, you can retire much earlier.

This sort of legislation is meant to address a few problems with 401(k)'s, one of which is that people often don't save enough, or invest their 401(k) assets in the ways that will benefit them the most. Even if your employer does make changes, they would be required to notify you of any changes they make, and you can always change them back. It's your money. But the idea is, basically, to make the employer take some proactive responsiblity for those who aren't paying attention or simply don't understand how to maximize their benefits. The effects of doing this or not doing this in your 20s and 30s are so profound that not setting people up to succeed in this way is just irresponsible.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Seriously good idea
While compound interest is taught in HS, few Americans seem to really understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. It's too bad they don't teach financial management in HS.
They should teach kids about 401(k)'s, compound interest, how credit reports work, the entire process it takes to buy a home, and how expensive a credit card's minimum payment really is, for starters. It's odd to me that we can't seem to devote a single semester to teaching young people about the things that will actually affect their lives the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I beg to differ
Most Americans have more credit card debit than they can handle paying rates in the high teens and low twenties.

Most 401K plans return far less than the Wall Street stock market returns. The 401k plans are where most stock managers dump their dogs. These plans mostly have returns which are much lower than the rates the investee is paying on their credit card debt. To get into the good plans takes alot of investigating.

What this new reg will do is hook in uninformed laborers into standard sub-performing plans.

The only way to win with a 401k plan is to constantly monitor what the plans are doing. That takes a lot of work and time which many do not have or are not willing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm not seeing it.

Re: 401(k) plans

You said "The only way to win with a 401k plan is to constantly monitor what the plans are doing." That's just not the case when you're investing for the long term.

All you need to do is invest in an index fund, and many if not most 401(k) plans offer them. Even if you don't invest in an index fund, you'll almost certainly be many tens of thousands of dollars better off at retirement investing in any long-term portfolio than you will be investing in the low-yield short-term funds that are the default choice today. For the worker who just runs on automatic, who doesn't pay much attention to their 401(k) until retirement, this will make a tremendous difference.


RE: Credit card debt

I don't disagree with you here at all -- we have way too much credit card debt. That's one of the reasons I think we should put a much greater emphasis on getting young workers investing in their retirement when they're in their late teens and early 20s, before they have a chance to get overwhelmed by credit card debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. But the "hi-jacked" 401k contributor doesn't get to the indexed fund
Edited on Mon Aug-07-06 12:55 PM by Robbien
They get dumped into the loser pile of dogs.

Yes there are many 401k plans out there which will do a lot of good for the investor, but the unknowing 401k hijacked employee will get led astray I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. What loser pile of dogs?
I set up 401 (k) plans for companies and honestly have no earthly idea what you're talking about.

Generally I show the benefits director the 40 funds a company offers and the director can choose any seven of those funds plus the money market option which is automatic.

Generally the director asks me for my recommendations.

Then I'll show him a solid bond fund, a balanced fund, a balanced fund with a fixed portion, a value stock fund, a growth stock fund, an international fund and an index fund.

This is for relatively small companies.

For larger ones the choices are much greater.

I'd like to know where it is in my interest to pick bad investments out for the company. That doesn't make a lick of sense. If the investments don't perform well, I'll lose the account as I know there will be three more salesman trying to get the benefits director to switch to their companies every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Dump their dogs?
The 401 (k's) I know about the company setting the plan up can chose from 7 to 40 options out of maybe hundreds of mutual funds. Usully the way it works is the finncial advisor working with the company makes recommendations of a spread of mutual funds and the company approves them.

The financial advisor has no interest in the funds performing badly, and the fund managers have no say in whether their fund is selected or not.

You might have a list of all 40 of the funds run by American Funds and you're asked to pick seven. Or you might have five different fund companies to choose among, perhaps American Funds, Franklin-Templeton, Lord Abbett, Putnam, Opeenheimer, AIM and Van Kampen, and you can pick 30 of their available funds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. You should research this some more...
There's a very good book out called "The Great 401(k) Hoax". It gives some really good counter arguments to the meme that 401(k)'s are good for workers.

I've known of quite a few people who took a lump sum retirement instead of a pension and ended up losing everything in the stock market and having to go back to work. I doubt seriously that very many average working people will end up as millionaires from their 401(k)'s.

At any rate, most average Americans don't have the knowledge, the time, or the motivation to know market ups and downs well enough to invest their money wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. you're sentiment is correct however one has to question
who will be regulating those giving investing advice and how will these same folks entice employers to automatically raise how much will be taken out of your paycheck. The fact that it's under the term "automatically" worries me because you may not know when or how much of your salary is being siphoned off. Your employer would be making changes on your behalf. For many siphoning off 4% from 3% of their paycheck hurts.

This reminds me of the dotcom bubble when stock pushers would go on tv peddling junk IPOs and telling new investors to buy this or that stock. In the end, the novice investor lost their shirts as these stocks in question imploded. This bill doesn't cover the prospect of this sort of predatory practice. The idea of forcing investment by proxy of automation of 90% of the workforce seems to be the next manipulation attempt at keeping the stock market from crashing once the real estate carnival ends.

The theory of having folks invest in 401ks would be nice if these inwilling investors where protected against market manipulation. Unfortunately the average person gets no protections until grave abuses occur where financial hardships move all of us to demand accountability. At least that's what history dictates and this bill does nothing to address the very real possibility of rampant fraud to occur. In other words this right now will be a free for all for Wall Street until the government or class action law suits reels these potential abuses in.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ciggies and coffee Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. With the medical industry knocking,

The financials have to get their share of the future scrip of workers. Longer lives, less living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC