Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US sanctions threaten Russian ties: Moscow press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 06:50 AM
Original message
US sanctions threaten Russian ties: Moscow press
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2006/August/theworld_August255.xml§ion=theworld&col=

MOSCOW - US sanctions against two leading Russian arms exporters mark a new low in chilly ties between the White House and the Kremlin and could scupper major potential trade deals with US firms, the Russian press said on Monday.

The United States on Friday announced sanctions on seven firms from Russia, India, North Korea, and Cuba for selling restricted items to Iran, which Washington fears is trying to make nuclear weapons.

Sanctions were imposed on Russian state export agency Rosoboronexport -- headed by a close friend of President Vladimir Putin -- and state-owned warplane maker Sukhoi, meaning they can no longer work with US firms.

“The imposition of sanctions against Rosoboronexport is practically a declaration of economic war against Russia,” the Izvestia newspaper, owned by state-controlled gas giant Gazprom, said in a front-page story.

“The Strategic Partnership between the US and Russia has Ended,” the Kommersant daily said in its front-page headline.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, bush** couldn't push Pootie around like he does Poodle?
bush** was way out of his league when he started to mess with ex-KGB. All the neocons were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. At the rate he is going
US will be painted into a corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. What the PNAC wants, the PNAC gets:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/russia-20050217.htm

February 17, 2005
MEMORANDUM TO: OPINION LEADERS

FROM: GARY SCHMITT

SUBJECT: Democracy in Russia

I would like to draw your attention to the following testimony of Bruce P. Jackson, President of the Project on Transitional Democracies and a director of the Project for the New American Century, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In his testimony, Mr. Jackson details the "rapid deterioration of democracy in Russia over the past 24 months, the cause of this deterioration, and the significant dangers Russian policy now poses for the United States, its European allies and friends."

Examples of Moscow's dodgy behavior over the past month alone include: attempts to sell arms to Syria and Chavez's Venezuela, and pressuring Kyrgyzstan into saying no to NATO and American requests to deploy an AWACs surveillance aircraft.

...

and this is my favorite part:

President Putin's initial argument for "managed democracy" rested on his belief that the sometimes unpredictable quality of liberal democracy could weaken the security of the Russian state unless it were subject to a substantial degree of state control. Whether or not he actually believed this, he quickly advanced to a more militant conviction that independent political parties, NGO's and journalists, by questioning the wisdom of his policy towards Chechnya, were effectively allies of terrorism. It is a short walk from the authoritarian view that domestic freedom must be curtailed in wartime to the dictatorial conclusion that all opposition and dissent is treasonous. By 2004, President Putin had arrived at the dictatorial conclusion.

:rofl:

Sound familiar?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-07-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am confused here....

... how in the heck is this going to affect anything? I severely doubt Bushco would allow either of those companies to bid or trade with the US, as they have their own campaign contributors, err..... i mean US firms to do business with.

It seems to be out of US jurisdiction (if it ever was) and is more shirt puffing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC