Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping Up With the Washington Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 08:34 PM
Original message
Keeping Up With the Washington Times
Just in case you've missed it lately.

Circulation must really be collapsing. Every day, there's a big stack of them left out for free at the library. My mom picks one up if she sees it.

Anyway, the news from Iraq is nothing but upbeat.

Presence of U.S. troops adds calm

August 3, 2006

THE WASHINGTON TIMES
BAGHDAD -- Iraqis living in Baghdad's most violent neighborhoods have been able to leave their homes safely for the first time in months, as American foot patrols moved in as part of a beefed-up security plan.
An additional 3,700 U.S. troops deployed in the capital in the past two days to join the roughly 56,000 U.S. and Iraqi troops already in the city.
The deployment is part of a six-week security operation intended to stop sectarian killings.
"Everybody knows that if Americans are there, then it is safe," said one young man who had just brought his pregnant wife home from the hospital.


So let's get all the way to end, where we see the money quote:


Police said nine persons were slain yesterday, a day after a wave of bombings and shootings killed more than 70.
• The writer's name has been withheld for security reasons. Sharon Behn contributed to this report from Washington.


Right. Things are so safe that "the writer's name has been withheld for security reasons." And some people were killed too.

OK, let's check out Inside Politics.

Harsh words
The American Conservative magazine, in its latest issue, ... the harsh tone of some conservatives toward ... Bush and today's conservative movement in general.
Jeffrey Hart, a senior editor of National Review, had this to say: "The common denominator of successful presidents, liberal or conservative, has been that they were realists. Because Bush is an ideologue remote from fact, he has failed comprehensively and surely is the worst president in American history -- indeed, in the damage he has caused to the nation, without a rival in the race for the bottom. Because Bush is generally called a conservative, he will have poisoned the term for decades to come."
Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr., president of the Ludgwig von Mises Institute and editor of LewRockwell.com, said: "A crude form of Hobbesianism has corrupted every conservative thinker in this country."
....

He added: "Do you protest? Have I misstated your own political views? You truly love liberty and hate the state and all its works? Good. Bail out of conservatism. Call yourself a libertarian, a liberal, an anarchist, an independent, a revolutionary, a Jeffersonian radical. Or make up your own name. But please, wake up and smell the massive espresso: When it comes to mindless party loyalty, conservatism today is as bad as communism ever was."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah it's just too bad that you can't find a ocnservative point of view
Anywhere.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well great, I'm calling AAA in the morning to book a vacation trip
Is there a nice hotel with a jogging path along the road to the airport? And are there still those tranqil walking tours available thru the city market district?

Thank God for the Looney Moonie Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I worked with Repubs and none of them read the Wash Times. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. IThe Moonie Times is painfully sad
I worked with people at at the Pentagon and nearby in Crystal City (lots of contractors) until several years ago. Voracious readers these folks, but about the only time they'll read the Moonie Times is if it's free.

And your first link illustrates why. Portraying Baghdad as a place where peace and quiet's returning is such a stupid lie. And the people working in and for the military know it.

I read somewhere that it's founding more than 20 years ago, the paper's cost Sun Myung Moon a billion plus dollars. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What do you mean "guy?"
:D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Before the 2004 election...
American Conservative ran an article that said that if Bush won, the conservative cause would be set back and vilified for at least a generation or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-06-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
6.  A National Review senior editor:"Bush worst president in U.S. history".
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC