Escalation before the endBy Haaretz Editorial
The diplomatic efforts to gain a cease-fire in the confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah have been stepped up in recent days. During the coming week it appears an accepted formulation of a Security Council resolution will be reached, bringing the hostilities to an end and creating a mechanism for the prevention of future conflagrations.
As is common in the Middle East, the closer the sides move toward a cease-fire, the more they escalate their operations in order to improve their position before the situation is frozen.An example of this escalation, in terms of the realization of Hassan Nasrallah's threats, came this weekend with the firing of missiles at Hadera and its environs.
Israel's escalation is expressed in renewed bombing of Beirut and in strikes against missile supply routes from Syria into Lebanon. On the other hand there has still not been a broadening of ground operations in southern Lebanon. There are advantages in discussing such plans, as a means of pressure, but it seems the approach most commonly identified with Chief of Staff Dan Halutz - which diminishes the importance of occupying territory beyond that already taken by IDF forces south of the Litani River - has been justified.
Katyusha rockets will continue to be launched from positions north of the Litani but it is more important to stabilize the line and secure the area occupied, in view of diplomatic bargaining that will result in handing the territory over to a responsible party - be it foreign or Lebanese.
The balance of power at this stage of the campaign appears to reflect Hezbollah's success in holding on . . .
article:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/746701.html