Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't it really unusual for a "moderate" Dem to win over a "moderate" Repu

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:20 PM
Original message
Isn't it really unusual for a "moderate" Dem to win over a "moderate" Repu
blican?

or not?

any opinions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. you'll get a million and one definitions of moderate.
Edited on Fri Aug-04-06 01:25 PM by wyldwolf
So your question may not be answerable.

However, Bob Dole (moderate by today's GOP standards) lost to Clinton.

Ford, a moderate by sensible definitions, lost to Carter - also a moderate.

But I predict I'll get disagreements on my characterizations..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Definitely agree with you on the term "moderate"
But I always thought of Ford as more like a "slow" Republican than a moderate one. But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. he is described as moderate
Edited on Fri Aug-04-06 01:36 PM by wyldwolf
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-21,GGLG:en&q=Gerald+Ford+moderate

But I'll just go ahead and answer you question outright. Yes. Happens often.

Some here want the answer to be "no" to provide credence to their belief that to win, the party must go left. But moderate win and often against moderate Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah, a self declared one
Edited on Fri Aug-04-06 01:36 PM by jsamuel
Ford continued as he had in his Congressional days to view himself as "a moderate in domestic affairs, a conservative in fiscal affairs, and a dyed-in-the-wool internationalist in foreign affairs."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/gf38.html

Also, that was right after watergate, but that still applies, so thanks for that example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. One thing I won't do is get into an argument on whether Ford was moderate
Edited on Fri Aug-04-06 01:41 PM by wyldwolf
Your original question was posed in such a way as to make the belief that the party must turn left more credible. Therefore, any example given will be met with "he wasn't moderate."

if you want to see how often he was reffered to as a moderate,

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2006-21,GGLG:en&q=Gerald+Ford+moderate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. sorry if my post came off that way, but I was actually inquiring about the
Edited on Fri Aug-04-06 01:53 PM by jsamuel
race in TN between Corker (R) and Ford (D) where both are viewed as "moderates"

Recent polls have shown Ford down a lot where other races like Carter vs Ensign show Carter gaining. (and notice how that one is not a LIBERAL CRAZY MAN VS A MODERATE REPUBLICAN, but a moderate Dem vs a right Repub)

(by the way I didn't say he wasn't "moderate" I was saying that I am skeptical of ANYONE being called a "moderate" because can be used as a political tool sometimes. I also thanked you for this example of a moderate Dem beating a moderate Rep in my previous post)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. The terms may be meaningless
But I'd say it probably is less likely. The attitude in the Republican Party since Gingrich has been one of triumphalism. They've had set backs and problems, of course, but it doesn't seem like they've ever realized that they are aren't actually going to defeat us and eliminate us (on the contrary they seem to still want to eliminate us).

I think a tinge of this attitude goes all the way down to the more moderate elements, who don't feel like they need o compromise.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC