Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rainbows Score Legal Victory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:03 AM
Original message
Rainbows Score Legal Victory
Edited on Wed Aug-02-06 09:04 AM by Traveling_Home
Press Release
For immediate release: Aug. 1, 2006

Prepared by the Colorado Legal Eagles
http://www.coloradolegaleagles.org

Contact: Don Wirtshafter
Email: don@hempery.com

Rainbows Score Legal Victories

-- Attendees of the Rainbow Family Annual Gathering scored
legal victories on Friday, July 28 when the US District Court agreed to
drop charges against Ohio attorney Don Wirtshafter and 124 other
defendants who had been charged with "use or occupancy of a National
Forest without a permit when one is required" when they attended the
Gathering earlier in July in the Routt National Forest near Steamboat
Springs, Colorado,

The USFS regulations require that any group of over 75 people file a
permit to be in the National Forest. Rainbow Gathering participants
disagree that these regulations apply to their assemblies. They
maintain that the Rainbow Family is not an organized group capable of
delegating authority to anyone to sign a permit. Instead, Rainbow
volunteers and the Forest Service resource officers agreed in advance
to Operating Plans for the gathering. However, after the gathering
began, the Law Enforcement and Investigations branch of the Forest
Service insisted that a formal permit be obtained. At that point,
several individuals offered to file permit applications without
signature, since they could not represent a group that has no leaders
or structure, but this offer was denied.

The USFS decided to try to stop the gathering by giving citations for
using the forest without a permit. They used "some of the harshest
law enforcement methods ever witnessed against peaceful citizens
exercising their right to assemble," said Wirtshafter. Over 75 armed
federal and local law enforcement officers manned roadblocks and
stopped cars heading into the gathering. Over 500 people received
citations, and many illegal searches, detainments, and incidents of
police brutality were reported. Despite the threat of arrest, at least
20,000 people attended the Gathering.

The Forest Service set up a temporary federal courthouse at a volunteer
fire station near Steamboat Springs to process the cases. "Conditions
at the makeshift courtroom were appalling," said Wirtshafter.
"Defendants were forced to wait in the sweltering heat with no water,
restrooms, shade, food, or telephones for up to 13 hours for their
cases to be called."

Initially, access to the makeshift federal courtroom was closed, even
to attorneys. A lawsuit filed by attorneys in Denver forced the
federal magistrate to open the courtroom, but the public was still
largely unable to witness the trials. There were no public defenders
available for indigent defendants. The court denied requests for
continuances and the opportunity to subpoena witnesses.

After seeing the conditions of the temporary courthouse, Ohio attorney
Don Wirtshafter petitioned the court to be admitted to the federal bar
of Colorado so he could represent some of the defendants who wished to
contest the citations. "It was the worst abuse of defendants I had ever
seen, far worse than I ever imagined the justice system could provide
in America," Wirtshafter said.

To cause maximum disruption, law enforcement officers targeted the
Gathering's medical, water system, and communication volunteers with
tickets. A gathering ambulance driver was stopped on the road miles
from the gathering and given a use and occupancy ticket. An EMT
qualified volunteer was arrested for interfering with the duties of a
police officer for trying to help individuals involved in a traffic
accident. A nurse-practitioner had her tent raided in the middle of
the night. The contents of her medical bag became the subject of a
controlled substance charge. It took a week to convince the
prosecutors there were no controlled substances and that she truly was
licensed to have the medicines that she possessed.

Wirtshafter discovered he was a target when driving a client back to
the Gathering after a trial at the makeshift courtroom. He had just
finished his first grilling cross-examination of Tim Lynn, Incident
Commander for the management team that the USFS moved in to "control"
the gathering. At the roadblock after the cross-examination,
Wirtshafter was given the only ticket that day.

In Federal court on Friday, Wirtshafter expressed his outrage at law
enforcement targeting officers of the court. The Assistant US Attorney
agreed and dismissed the outstanding charges against Wirtshafter.
Charges were also dropped against another 124 defendants who had
received citations, but had failed to appear in court. The Assistant
US Attorney agreed to accept $15 fines for each and a local
philanthropist paid for them.

"It's yet another example of how unfairly defendants were treated in
the temporary court. It was more like Guantanamo than anything
resembling what we expect from the American justice system,"
Wirtshafter said. "The fact that the US Attorney did not want to
prosecute any of these cases shows how frivolous the charges were to
begin with. It's clear that Incident Command's intention was simply to
harass and intimidate legitimate forest users and chill the momentum of
the growing rainbow family."

Of the over 500 citations issued, most were adjudicated at the
makeshift courtroom in Steamboat with most defendants agreeing to pay a
$40 collateral forfeiture fee in exchange for dropping the charges.
However, there are 4 defendants that have filed notices to appeal their
convictions in the makeshift courtroom.

On August 11, Rob Savoye, a Nederland computer consultant who
voluntarily provides communications and medical facilities at the
Gatherings, will be one of the last defendants to appear in US District
Court. Savoye is being treated differently. He was not offered the
$40 collateral forfeiture fee that the other defendants were offered.
The USFS believes Savoye is the "secret leader" of the Rainbow Family
because he hosts a Rainbow website (http://www.welcomehome.org).
Savoye will be represented by Phil Dubois, a Colorado Springs attorney
who gained notoriety in his successful defense of Phil Zimmerman, who
was prosecuted by the federal government for violating U.S. export
restrictions on cryptographic software for posting PGP, a free email
encryption program, on the Internet.

For more information on the Rainbow Gatherings, see
http://www.welcomehome.org/

For Reports from the 2006 Gathering, see:
http://www.coloradolegaleagles.org/

###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. good to see a win for the Rainbows
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Anti-Neo Con Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm glad they won too.
It's not like they are a threat gathering in large numbers. I know a few people that belong to Rainbow Family & they're some of the most peaceful & laid-back people around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. If anyone does not believe this was "practice" or a "dry run"
I would reconsider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuffs_enuffs Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is far from the 1st "dry run."
Last time I went was many moons ago... at least 10 years, and even then lots o' harassment, cops and sheriffs galore, grey FEMA vans, listening devices and such. 1st the gypsies...

Even still, I couldn't help but have a good time. Even met the Mad Doser and Wavy Gravy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just wait for the "Rainbow Haters" to show here


See, the Rainbowers want to use the NATIONAL ( as in publicly owned) forest near where others live. And that bothers those "others" who tend to demonize this group.


So it's perfectly fine to suspend these folk's right to due process.

Now, I live in the forest, near places where tourists come, and I'd prefer they all stay away but I understand their right to be here, to enjoy the land, even if it might impact that land in less than positive ways sometimes.

My own personal comfort is not of higher value than someone else's right to use public property and to have equal justice under our laws.

BUT just wait. The Rainbow bashers should be here any second.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuffs_enuffs Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Luckily... they are tied up with the Anti-Zionists... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What are you smoking?
crack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enuffs_enuffs Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Jeeze!
Does someone need a nap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC