The Ukrainians were hailed at leading an "Orange Revolution"-
http://www.time.com/time/europe/magazine/article/0,13005,901041206-832153,00.html?cnn=yesWhile Obrador is branded a "Leftist" and accused of blocking traffic
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/07/31/mexico.election.protest.ap/index.htmlAnd CNN/time is actually nicer to Obrador than other news media.
Here is Reuters take on the Situation
MEXICO CITY, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Street protests led by the leftist candidate in Mexico's presidential election plunged the capital into chaos for a second day on Tuesday, raising fears of a long and increasingly nasty fight over vote fraud claims.
http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=bondsNews&storyID=2006-08-02T040218Z_01_N0196133_RTRIDST_0_MEXICO-ELECTION-UPDATE-2-PICTURE.XMLYou guys remember how glowing the media coverage was of the lauded "Orange Revolution" in the Ukraine. It seems (according to the media) than the even larger protests in Mexico are "Hurting the economy" or "Blocking traffic" or "Creating a dangerous situation". I don't think the reporters are necessarily doing this on purpose, but if people could call them on it in a friendly manner we might discover the reasons for this discrepancy.
I am also wondering why they decline to cover, for the most part, the emerging proof of voter fraud-
http://www.alternet.org/story/39763/Probably for the same reasons they didn't cover it when it happened here:(