The asserted facts are a Hez controlled area in a "Christian area" where Hez is blending in - wearing jewelery, no uniforms, etc.
Also asserted is that Hez has put weapons next to civilian buildings - that Hezbollah is using high-density residential areas as launch pads for rockets and heavy-caliber weapons
Then images are presented of a group of men and youths preparing to fire an anti-aircraft gun meters from an apartment block with sheets hanging out on a balcony to dry - in a Christian area -with the assertion that nothing was happening in that area until Hez rolled the weapons in. And after they rolled the weapons in Israeli air power attacked (which does track with the reports of Israeli air power firing into Christian areas - although it appears Hez was not successful in getting their photo's of civilian dead in this particular exercise).
Another photo is presented is asserted to be a militant with an AK47 rifle guarding no-go zones after Israeli blitzes.
And the last photo is asserted yo be the remnants of a Hezbollah Katyusha rocket in the middle of a residential block blown up in an Israeli air attack - implying not that the Katyusha was stored there and was destroyed by an Israeli air attack.
What in the above has been debunked? Does anyone really believe the largest paper in the country would lie or not have sourced the material and verified the credibility of the source?
Since the UN said the same thing about moving into civilian buildings with heavy weapons thereby causing civilian deaths, are the UN and the newspaper both liars? I can't wait for more excuses for the white hat terrorists called Hez.
Perhaps we should all just agree on the need for a ceasefire, and that civilian harm and death is a lousy thing, and leave the building of a case for Hez Sainthood to another day and another board?
http://letters.salon.com/news/feature/2006/07/28/hezbollah/view/index2.html?show=allA LETTER TO SALON:
So you claim that Hezbollah does not use civilians for cover.
To claim this, you must ignore Jan Egeland of the UN, who complained of this practice.
You must ignore IDF video clips showing exactly what you deny: rocket launchers firing from residential areas.
You must ignore a continuing stream of witness accounts confirming the same thing.
You must ignore the practice of Hezbollah's fighters not wearing uniforms in combat (even though they love to wear uniforms when they march in formation).
In other words, you are in denial about this patently obvious fact. Hezbollah uses civilians for cover. Your reporter, Mitch Prothero is either a liar or a fool. And you editors are willfully blind. You owe your readers an apology for carrying an article so patently false. How long will it take before you issue it?
A letter to Salon with a different point of view - by "Joanne"
"Actually that Herald Sun photo claimed to have a broken down truck IN A CHRISTIAN NEIGHBOURHOOD, in the east of Lebanon.
Some genius might like to inform us all why the shi'ite Hezbollah would be in a christian neighbourhood and then pin point any christian neighbourhood that has been bombed to bits. (she forgets the reports of the Israeli air attack on the Christian area - but forgeting is something I also do - so no foul :-) papau)
The Herald Sun is a rag. The article also claims that Katushya rockets had been fired from that christian area - if so were the christians firing them when we know for sure that none have been fired from Beirut at all.
Responded to on DU
1) Do you think Hezbollah thinks Israel will say "let's not bomb those defensive weapons?"
2) Does Hezbollah actually think they're going to shoot down a high-altitude F-16 with those things?
3) What good does parking them in a civilian area accomplish?
DUer Junkdrawer said
I think the Herald Sun got hold of a picture of A-rabs on a big gun.and the pro-Israeli and Right Wing websites are riding the shamefully mis-titled article until they can find something better or until it becomes a joke.- And Junkdrawer also claims the photo has been debunked.
And DUer leveymg - pretending, I guess, that Hez is fighting an occupying power and are therefore guerrilla fighters rather than terrorists launching missiles from Lebanon into Israeli cities and crossing the border to kill and kidnap Israeli citizens and sending terrorists into Israel to be "cells" to kill and kidnap using Hez money and weapons to do that job - says " It has become the line of the day to repeat the bit about "shameful hiding" amidst civilians. I don't see how a guerilla war can be fought otherwise. The critique presupposes an utter ignorance of military doctrine about how to fight an asymmetrical opponent."
But none of the above is a debunking, is it?