Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Democrats Take Back Congress This Year?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:49 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will Democrats Take Back Congress This Year?
If their is little or no election tampering what do you expect to happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. What kind of advantage did Dems hold back in 94 before
the Republicans took over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not much, not really
although they did manage to block the worst of the right wing's outrages. They still had the pink tutu squad trying to make nice with the junkyard dogs on the right and getting legislation watered down beyond recognition and refusing, with the GOP, to raise the minimum wage to its purchasing power in 1970, before the oil shocks put it way below subsistence level.

(Factoid: the minimum wage in 1954 was pegged to support a one earner family of four on a "thrifty" budget, well above the poverty line)

The problem, as always, is the conservative wing within the party, siding with the ideologues on the lunatic right instead of working to hammer out compromises with progressives and coming up with truly workable legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Bigger than Repubs have now
The Repubs picked up around 50 seats (54?) and if I remember correctly ended up with 229 sets after the 94 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The party's failure to mobilize around the issues articulated by...
Gore, Edwards and Pelosi -- not to mention Boxer and Dean -- is a failure of such breathtaking magnitude I now truly understand why people bang their heads against brick walls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Both I hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. IF, IF, IF we get rid of evoting machines
we will take back the House and Senate. IF evoting machines with no paper trail....forget about it! This country will be GONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. agreed. Vote anyway! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. YES!
Otherwise we get the will of Diebold again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. we need to unify write now put are differences aside on vote democrat.
That's the only way were going to do it. Vote lib or green were dead in the water. I hate to say but this is the sink or swim time for the Donkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oops I didn't read the first line in the poll
If there is little or no tampering I believe we could easilly take both houses if the Dems keep their momentum for the rest of the year. But I think alot of races will be fixed. I don't expect a gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. ha
Iran will be bunkerbuster nuclear bombed by proxie Israel
Iraq will still have four permanent bases
Oil will still not be flowing from Iraq
Afghanistan will be further embroiled in civil war
As will Iraq
there will have been a mihop
bush will have declared martial law
fema will be attempting to control all of the US through its divisions of control
the effects of peak oil will be well underway as will those of global warming
choas will be beginning
the american economy will tank - big big time
we will be fucked
etc.

Bet ya.

Best 8 out of 12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. not as long as BushCo owns the voting machines and . . .
Republican corporations do the tabulating . . . they cheated in 2000, they cheated in 2002, they cheated in 2004 . . . any doubt that they will cheat in 2006? . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. nope, the all GOP, all the time media won't have it
and will giidily trot out the latest lib'rul bogeyman on FOX, FOX2 (MSNBC), and FOX3 (CNN)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dems will probably pick up the house
But to my knowledge, there just are not enough competitive seats in the Senate that warrant a Democratic changeover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. They don't have enough momentum
to take back the Senate, but I bet you they'll take the House and that means impeachment time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. We need to pick up, like, 30 seats, right?
And how many seats are up?

Magic 8-Ball Says - "Don't count on it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. All of the House. Don't know about the Senate.
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 02:40 AM by Crazy Guggenheim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. 33 for the Senate
http://www.fecinfo.com/2006senate.htm

Only a few are competitive though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WernhamHogg Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. Neither
I don't think they will take back either, but I do think that they will considerably cut into the Repukes majority. The Repukes will still have the majority, but they will no longer be allowed to run roughshod as they have for the past 5 years. Of course, I would be thrilled if the Dems took back either or both, but I'm trying not to get my hopes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Diebold says NO!
Besides, didn't any of you listen to Senator Kerry in the last election?

Senator Kerry said, that the 2004 Election decided the direction of our country for the next twenty years. He wasn't only speaking about the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC