Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evolution key issue for Kan. voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:19 PM
Original message
Evolution key issue for Kan. voters
TOPEKA, Kan. - Kansas Board of Education members who approved new classroom standards that call evolution into question faced a counterattack at the polls Tuesday (today) from Darwin's defenders.

Five of the 10 seats on the board were up for election in the primary, the latest skirmish in a seesawing battle between faith and science that has opened Kansas up to international ridicule.

Last November, the Board of Education's 6-to-4 conservative Republican majority rewrote testing standards for public schools to incorporate language supported by advocates of intelligent design, which holds that life is so complex it must have been created by some kind of higher power. The new standards say that some aspects of evolution are contradicted by scientific evidence.

On Tuesday, three members of the majority faced GOP primary foes who support evolution. A fourth Republican conservative is retiring, and her seat was up for grabs.

more . . .
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060801/ap_on_el_st_lo/kansas_evolution;_ylt=AlaGPTTNE847.4m1Jttvxxdh24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, boy.
I can't wait to see those returns tonight. It'd be great to welcome Kansas back to the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes it looks good so far
I am going out to Dennis Moore's party to watch the returns.

It will be great to see the freaks on that board gone. We could know as early as today that the board will no longer be a conservative majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Don't go yelling at the helpless candidates, now.
We don't want to be divisive, do we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Unit Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Election Results Will Be Important
These contests will be very important for at least a couple of reasons. As Proud says, perhaps the Kansas St. Bd. of Education can rejoin the rest of the world by a moderate Republican turn-out that will repudiate the anti-evolution fundies. But, even if they don't defeat the fundies, perhaps the results pitting pro-science Democrats in the general election against the fundies will foretell many moderate Republicans voting for the Democrats, thereby dumping the fundies this November. Hopefully, the mods will vote with the Dems not only for the purposes of vindicating science, but also out of a sense of retaliation because of the defeat of the mods in the closed Republican primaries. Perhaps Kansas is in a win-win situation, in other words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hey BU!!
:hi:

I definitely think it is win-win. The mods here are embarrassed. The conservative pukes are falling all over each other scrambling to take the state. I have never seen so many campaign signs for a primary election! And the RWers don't have a snowball's (or should I say snowFLAKE'S) chance in hell of winning the governor's race. It is really rather comical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It could also be a portent nationally.
I'm trying to be optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kansas going back wards every day. One State I would NEVER live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You must not have read the article
The elections today could do away with the conservative majority. That would be moving FORWARD.

Kansas is an awesome place to live. We just have a few oddballs, much like most other states do nowadays. Like PA has Santorum, GA has Ralph Reed, VA has Falwell, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bperci108 Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. But you ARE proud to live in MI?
Home of Militia-celebrity Mark Koernke and the tens-of-thousands like him?

I remember something about "glass houses".... :P

Seriously, this was once a very progressive state and will be again, once the fundie-whack-jobs are run out of here on a rail. I think folks have had about enough from them. Even the mega-churches are becoming infiltrated with liberal believers and these are the center of power for the far right here.

I wouldn't write off KS as a bunch of hayseeds just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-02-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Guns vs Bibles no one wins. I will take my Lakes over the flat land any
Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sgxnk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. ID is NOT science
i am repeating myself here...

but...

this is so #$(#$#$#$!!!

ID is *not* science

sure, evolution is not a perfect theory (iow, there are holes in it - much like euclidean geometry had holes), but it is clearly -on an occam's razor basis - THE theory, it has consensus, and regardless - ID is not an "alternative theory" since it is not a SCIENTIFIC THEORY

it is NOT science, thus it cannot be an alternative scientific theory



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well I am a proponent of the flying spaghetti monster theory
http://www.venganza.org/

"Letting the religious right teach ID in schools is like letting the Marines teach poetry in advanced combat training. As a scientist, I see these the relevancy between the two sets to be equal. If Kansas is going to mess up like this, the least it can do is not be hypocritical and allow equal time for other alternative "theories" like FSMism, which is by far the tastier choice."
-- J. Simon, PhD

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sgxnk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. well put
i was actually trying to come up with some analogy like that

like saying

ID is not an "alternative theory" to evolution any more than a ham sandwich is an alternative artistic style to impressionism

or something

i have no problem with PRIVATE schools teaching ID. although, they SHOULD teach it as philosophy not science

public schools should NOT teach ID.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC