Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scooter Libby's fuzzy-memory defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:20 PM
Original message
Scooter Libby's fuzzy-memory defense
Scooter Libby's fuzzy-memory defense

Why does Scooter Libby's account of events in the Valerie Plame case not jibe with that of reporters from Time, NBC, and the New York Times? You could say because he's lying. But that's not a very kind interpretation. And according to Libby's defense team, Libby and various prosecution witnesses may have different recollections because of something far deeper and more complex -- the poorly understood way in which the human brain processes memory.

This is not a joke. On Monday Libby's lawyers asked Reggie B. Walton, the federal judge presiding over Libby's upcoming trial on charges that he lied to a investigators during the Plame investigation, to allow them to bring a memory expert to the stand in order to explain the idiosyncratic way our brains record and retrieve what goes on in our lives.

Among the facts that Libby's team wants the expert -- Robert A. Bjork, chairman of the psychology department at UCLA -- to explain to the jury is that "memory does not function like a tape recorder, with memories recorded, stored and played back verbatim." Rather memories are malleable, and can be influenced by a person's prior memories and other events. The filing -- available, like everything else, at the TPM Document Collection -- also explains that "memory research has shown that people can forget that they once remembered something," and that "forgetting, rather than being simply a weakness of memory, is also an efficient component in the efficient use of memory."

I'd have fingered Libby as a fairly hard-nosed guy, a man of moral clarity who sees the world as a place of irrefutable truths, where something so fuzzy as the flaws of memory would never sully one's sense of right and wrong. So it's fun to see him pursue this post-modern avenue now, embracing, like a hippie who's eaten too many special brownies, the Rashomon qualities of life. Libby remembers one set of facts, and Judy Miller, Tim Russert, and Matthew Cooper remember something else. But can we ever really know for sure what exactly happened? What is truth? What is knowledge? How did we get here? What is the meaning of it all? We might as well call the whole thing off...

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I had read, a while back, that Libby's team secured the testimony of...
Daniel Schacter, another memory expert. Memory is certainly not as reliable as many people tend to believe, but I don't know if I'm gonna buy it in the case of Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Robert Bork?
Is that THE Bork? I wouldn't want him appearing on my behalf. I'd surely get Borked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uppanotch Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. "My clients don't want justice. They want freedom". Percy Foreman nt

nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's Why The Lawyer's Get The Big Bucks
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 12:34 PM by ThomWV
Delay, shoot with a shotgun and hope for a hit, money, you name it.

On Edit:

I do not mean that to be a snipe at lawyers. I happen to think lawyers are the most necessary people in reasonable society. What I mean is that Libby's lawyers are doing exactly what they should be doing - its what they are paid for - and it is what I would expect from them were they defending me. I'd want them to try everything they could possibly think of to get me off no matter if its chances of success were great or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uppanotch Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Lawyer's"? "Lawyers". Liars. Lawyer's lies. Lives of the lawyers? nt

nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is the stuff of jokes
right up there with OJ finding the real killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC