If a Democrat had called for an Israeli "cease fire" yesterday how many...

[NNN0LHI]

...Republican spokespeople, pundits, and book writers would there have been on every news channel today calling the Democrats Hezbollah sympathizers with the interviewer bobbing his or her head up and down in agreement like a bobble-head doll?

[Donald Ian Rankin]

1. I like the options

"Over a hundred", "less than a hundred" and "some other number". Or "A hundred", as it's technically known...

[KG]

2. the reaction of the right is no justification for

not doing the right thing.

but appearently, the right thing should be done only when it's convenient for the dem party.

[NNN0LHI]

3. I think the point you may be missing here is that there would be Ø talk...

...of any cease fire if it wasn't to the Republicans advantage. For that matter there would be no invasion by Israel if it wasn't to the Republicans advantage.

You think Israel would have invaded anyone had it not been given the OK to do so by its largest benefactor the USA? Where they going to get the bombs and planes if we don't give them to them?

You don't hear any talk of a cease fire at the UN for Afghanistan or Iraq do you? Why do you think that is? Because the US wouldn't allow any such talk at the UN. Would we?

Why is the US allowing talk at the UN about an Israeli cease fire for? You have any ideas?

Don

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

4. I wish the Democrats would do so and find out.

Instead of backing the slaughter.