Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Statement against the US-Israeli War on Lebanon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Laotra Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:50 AM
Original message
Statement against the US-Israeli War on Lebanon
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 08:33 AM by Laotra
The Socialist Workers Party and other international socialist groups have issued a statement on Israel's attack on Lebanon and why socialists should express solidarity with the fighters of Hizbollah and hope that they succeed in defeating the Israeli assault.

Israel’s war in Lebanon is the latest stage in the imperialist offensive mounted by the United States and its allies since 11 September 2001. The conquest of Iraq was intended to unleash a process of “regime change” that would remove the obstacles to US domination of the Middle East. Instead, thanks to the resistance in Iraq, the Pentagon finds itself bogged down in a guerrilla war that it cannot win.

The Bush administration has therefore set itself the goal of removing the Islamic Republican regime in Iran, whose influence in Iraq has grown since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. This would reverse the blow to US interests in the Middle East struck by the Iranian Revolution of 1978-9. Israel’s offensive against Hizbollah therefore offers Washington an opportunity to eliminate a powerful anti-imperialist force that has close links with Iran. The complicity of George W Bush and his closest accomplice, Tony Blair, in this war of aggression is shown by the role that the US and Britain have played in blocking the call by the overwhelming majority in the United Nations for an immediate ceasefire.

International diplomacy has centred on this call and on the introduction into Lebanon of a multinational “peacekeeping” force to separate the two sides. The latter proposal is very dangerous. Bush and Olmert initially hoped that a multinational force would consolidate Israel’s defeat of Hizbollah. But the stubborn and effective resistance mounted by Hizbollah has made outright military victory for Israel a distant prospect indeed.

In these circumstances, the US and Israel are pressing for a multinational force, perhaps organized by Nato or the European Union, to continue the war against Hizbollah that they are failing to win. Such a force would not be “peacekeepers” but another Western army of occupation alongside those in Iraq and Afghanistan. It must be one of the most urgent tasks of the international radical left to oppose this multinational force. This is especially important in Europe, where several governments, especially the centre-left coalition in Italy, are already negotiating over the basis of such a force.

We oppose Israel’s war against Lebanon, out of solidarity with the Lebanese people but also because we are against Bush’s planned attack on Iran. Some on the left combine a similar position with condemnation of Hizbollah for having attacked and captured Israeli soldiers. We strongly disagree with this stance.

As revolutionary socialists we have many ideological differences with Hizbollah, which is an Islamist party. But Hizbollah developed into a national liberation movement with deep roots in the poorest and most oppressed sections of Lebanese society thanks to the successful guerrilla campaign it mounted against the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon during the 1980s and 1990s.

Moreover, Hizbollah initiated its latest action partly to help relieve the Palestinians of Gaza, who have been suffering a particularly brutal Israeli siege. Therefore we are happy to join the Arab masses in expressing our solidarity with the fighters of Hizbollah and our hope is that they succeed in defeating the Israeli assault on Lebanon.

As socialists and internationalists we see our main responsibility as rallying mass opposition in our own countries to this war. Around the world here have already been a substantial number of protest actions against Israel’s battering of Lebanon. More and bigger mobilizations will be needed in coming weeks if the bombardment continues. We pledge ourselves to building the widest possible movement against this war.

The basis of this movement must be the unity of all those who oppose the Israeli offensive, irrespective of the many political disagreements that may exist among them about the Middle East and about other issues. This movement must be closely linked to the continuing international campaign against the “war on terrorism” and in particular against the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, a campaign whose capacity for mass mobilization has demonstrated the importance of working on the basis of the broadest possible unity.

Israel’s bombardment of Lebanon starkly illustrates the brutality of imperialism and the suffering it daily inflicts on the world. But, like the occupation of Iraq, it also shows that the US and its allies and clients are not omnipotent - they can be defeated. The Lebanese war can advance Washington’s offensive in the region, but it can equally mark a victory for the forces resisting imperialist domination of the Middle East. The internationalist and radical left must throw their weight into the balance to help secure a defeat for imperialism that can weaken the global tyranny of capital.

Edit to add the link:
http://socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9365
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can you provide a link to more info?
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laotra Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks for reminding, link added. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. "express solidarity with the fighters of Hizbollah."
Umm... no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm against the current siege
but not for political reasons like the Socialist Workers Party. I'm against it for humanitarian reasons and the end of America's soul. The Socialist Workers Party to me is just another nut group that opposes America whether it is right or wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laotra Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well
I hope that whether you agree or not, you can grant that SWP and IS base their positions on consistent anti-capitalistic and anti-imperialistic political analysis. Among the various revolutionary socialist tendencies I find them one of least "nutty".

But out of curiosity, how do you define "America"? Does the word really equal with capitalism and imperialism in your semantic web?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No.
I just don't agree that the SWP has to represent socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laotra Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Umm?
Maybe your point was lost on me, but what else is International Socialist tendency and it's English representative, the Socialist Worker Party, supposed to represent, if not socialism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's this.
I don't equate capitalism with imperialism. A country can be capitalist without being imperialist. The same thing with socialism. A socialist country can be expansionist (imperial if you will) or not. The SWP equates capitalism with imperialism. SWP is free as far as I'm concerned to be on the ballot anywhere in America as anyone else does for that matter and make it's case, and that is my "America". Whether America is becoming or has become something else is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laotra Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. OK
You are free to disagree, but that is where you and most Marxist theories differ, as they claim that imperialism is inherently a capitalistic phenomenon: competition for natural resources and labour forces capitalistic entities, whether states or corporations, to act imperialistically ("softly" through economic power or hard way through open violence). On the other hand, socialist internationalism where competition would not be the driving social force but co-operation, would be free from imperialism.

This is a big and complex subject but goes too much OT, so perhaps we can hope continue on some other thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
Thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC