Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 yrs. on, the Project for a New American Century is going VERY well

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:07 AM
Original message
10 yrs. on, the Project for a New American Century is going VERY well
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 05:08 AM by Philosoraptor
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES

June 3, 1997

American foreign and defense policy is adrift. Conservatives have criticized the incoherent policies of the Clinton Administration. They have also resisted isolationist impulses from within their own ranks. But conservatives have not confidently advanced a strategic vision of America's role in the world. They have not set forth guiding principles for American foreign policy. They have allowed differences over tactics to obscure potential agreement on strategic objectives. And they have not fought for a defense budget that would maintain American security and advance American interests in the new century.

We aim to change this. We aim to make the case and rally support for American global leadership.


As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?


We are in danger of squandering the opportunity and failing the challenge. We are living off the capital -- both the military investments and the foreign policy achievements -- built up by past administrations. Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. And the promise of short-term commercial benefits threatens to override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are jeopardizing the nation's ability to meet present threats and to deal with potentially greater challenges that lie ahead.

We seem to have forgotten the essential elements of the Reagan Administration's success: a military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States' global responsibilities.


Of course, the United States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire. The history of this century should have taught us to embrace the cause of American leadership.

Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;


• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;


• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz

----------------------------------------------

This shit reads exactly like a Nazi plan for conquering Earth, the arrogance is absolutely ROMAN in it's scope. This shit was written ten years ago, and all this shit happening now and every thing that has happened since and before is all part of the glorious master race plan.

Look at the signatures at the bottom, these are the men, these are the Nazis who infest our government.

All they had to do was write up a document and sign it and bada bing, the Earth belongs to America. Amazing huh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. So
...when are they going to start on step #1, rally support for American global leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some folks may not warm up to the Idea at first...
...but surely if we stay the current course the world will smile as we crush them under out boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Stay the course!
Brilliant!

(With apologies to the fine folks at Guinness.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. My thoughts exactly.
I was reading this site just last night to see if they were peeing themselves with delight over their plan and when I saw that, I just laughed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. "ensure our security and our greatness"
What a bunch of pompous asses.

Each time I read this document I am amazed at the brutal stupidity of these fascists. But it is useful, because with it and other PNAC publications, you can pretty much tell what the Bush junta is going to do next. These neocons, after all, are running the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Ain't that the truth... PNAC docs should be required reading. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Here, try this website
There's some interesting, if disturbing, scoop about neocons. We must know this enemy. I think when Ike warned about the military-industrial complex, this is exactly who he was talking about.

http://zfacts.com/p/253.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. here's the scary thing -- the signers on that list
won't go away simply because we win back the house -- say in 06.

these are powerful influential people in both political parties.

they have the ears of ceos and cfos and they sit on the boards of directors of important corporations.

they have permanently influenced politics and the direction of the government -- they will leave behind embedded bureaucrats, judges, et who will consistently be trying to pull the country back into their sphere of influence.

that is unless they are subjected to a relentless campaign of discrediting them by the left.
we didn't do it to reagan -- and that was a mistake.

these people should have their intellects -- their judgments -- their craving for power -- subjected to a relentless never ending campaign of reality analysis by the left -- and then hang their stinking carcases on the neck of the republican party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. "they will leave behind embedded bureaucrats"
Just as they were left behind after Nixon. Nixon's people referred to them as 'the crazies'.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. "inconstant leadership...
making it increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world."

Democracy is just too darn inconvenient. Nice to see they've found a way around that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The rest of the world simply needs to be more like America.
Why don't they get it? Its for their own good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. I just had a GREAT idea!
And I'm young enough to pull this off:

I'm going to make it my mission to take a picture of myself spitting, pissing, shitting or in some other fashion desecrating the grave of each of the signatories of the PNAC mission statement. When I'm an old fart on my deathbed, I can pull out my collection of these pictures and show my grandchildren the small part that I played in fighting the fascism of the early 21st century.

Any of those assholes dead yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It could work.
There actually was a guy who took a photo of himself pissing on Reagan's tomb and put it online. Someday they'll make a statue of this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Anybody know where Ken Lay is buried?
If somebody puts together a tour, Saint Ronnie should certainly be included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. I don't think any of them are dead yet
So hold your bodily fluids.

I love the spunk (unintentional pun) of the young!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. That 'thousand year reich' thing worked out so well, you'd think they'd
learn to avoid anything with a specific time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. Itt needs to be shouted from the mountaintops
PNAC = Project for a New American Century = PNAC
Just near the end of Danielle Pletka on C-spn, an intelligent caller from MI brought up that she was a Neocon and propagandist for PNAC.
Peter, the host, had to ask what PNAC stood for???? duh :silly:
I guess it is just willful ignorance that no news people have cared to follow up on PNAC.

I have posted Pnac crap on another website and the PNAC primer and none of it has sunk in. :silly:
:freak:

Just found out that PNAC doesn't compute here on spellcheck. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. At this point they are either LYING if they deny PNAC or they truly are
willfully ignorant. Either way, they are not qualified for their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. No lie
What does PNAC stand for again?
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yes it is.
And make no mistake, it's an entrenched political power that has standing in both parties. It's the longest battle those of us who want America to return to something akin to its meaning will have to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. Wow - you are so on the mark.
This is our real battle, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. "New American Century" Project Ends With A Whimper
Published on Tuesday, June 13, 2006 by the Inter Press Service
by Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - Is the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which did so much to promote the invasion of Iraq and an Israel-centred "global war on terror", closing down?

In the absence of an official announcement and the failure since late last year of a live person to answer its telephone number, a Washington Post obituary would seem to be definitive. And, sure enough, the Post quoted one unidentified source presumably linked to PNAC that the group was "heading toward closing" with the feeling of "goal accomplished".

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0613-05.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Goal accomplished.
It is no longer a think tank but an entrenched power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
17. Would it be a stretch to call it a CONSPIRACY?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. PNAC.info--- bookmark it.
Ah yes. 90 page pdf. And everything else you ever wanted to know about the PNAC at this site: http://pnac.info/

"An effort to investigate, analyze, and expose the Project for the New American Century, and its plan for a “unipolar” world."

Here is their back-up copy of just one of many PNAC docs every DUer should have read long ago by now:

"Rebuilding America's Defenses" -- the PNAC's plan for a "unipolar" world
http://pnac.info/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf


PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Roger Barnett U.S. Naval War College
Alvin Bernstein, National Defense University
Stephen Cambone, National Defense University
Eliot Cohen. Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Devon Gaffney, Cross Donors' Forum for International Affairs
Thomas Donnelly, Project for the New American Century
David Epstein, Office of Secretary of Defense, Net Assessment
David Fautua, Lt. Col., U.S. Army
Dan Goure, Center for Strategic and International Studies
Donald Kagan, Yale University
Fred Kagan, U. S. Military Academy at West Point
Robert Kagan, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Robert Killebrew, Col., USA (Ret.)
William Kristol, The Weekly Standard
Mark Lagon, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
James Lasswell, GAMA Corporation
I. Lewis Libby, Dechert Price & Rhoads
Robert Martinage, Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment
Phil Meilinger, U.S. Naval War College
Mackubin Owens, U.S. Naval War College
Steve Rosen, Harvard University
Gary Schmitt, Project for the New American Century
Abram Shulsky
The RAND Corporation
Michael Vickers, Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment
Barry Watts, Northrop Grumman Corporation
Paul Wolfowitz, Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Dov Zakheim, System Planning Corporation

If I could find it a long time ago, the MSM surely could have and did, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And while we're naming names--
Refresher from 2003


Advisors of Influence:
Nine Members of the Defense Policy Board Have Ties to Defense Contractors


By André Verlöy and Daniel Politi
Data by Aron Pilhofer

WASHINGTON, March 28, 2003 — Of the 30 members of the Defense Policy Board, the government-appointed group that advises the Pentagon, at least nine have ties to companies that have won more than $76 billion in defense contracts in 2001 and 2002. Four members are registered lobbyists, one of whom represents two of the three largest defense contractors.

report:
http://www.public-i.org/report.aspx?aid=91

{bold-face mine}


Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee

(as of December 2002)

Kenneth Adelman
Adelman is currently a national editor for The Washingtonian magazine and a senior counselor at Edelman Public Relations Worldwide. From 1981 to 1983, he served as deputy U.S. representative to the United Nations. He was director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency from 1983 to 1987 and he also headed the U.S. team on annual arms control discussions to China from 1983 through 1986.

Richard V. Allen
Allen is a senior counselor to APCO Worldwide and an international business consultant in Washington, D.C. He worked for both President Nixon and President Reagan. Allen is also a member of the National Security Advisory Group, which advises the Senate Majority Leader and the Speaker of the House, and he is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

Martin Anderson
Anderson is the Keith and Jan Hurlbut Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He worked for President Nixon's campaign in 1968 and in his administration from 1969 to 1971. He was a policy adviser on presidential campaigns of Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980, Pete Wilson in 1995, Bob Dole in 1996 and George W. Bush in 2000.

Gary Becker
Becker, who won the Nobel Prize in Economic Science in 1992, is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor at the University of Chicago. He served as an economic policy adviser for the Dole presidential campaign in 1996.

(more)

********************

read the cv about all 30, pre-war Iraq:

Barry M. Blechman

Harold Brown

Eliot Cohen

Devon Cross

Gen. (Ret.) Ronald R. Fogleman

Thomas S. Foley

Tillie Fowler

Newt Gingrich

Gerald Hillman

Gen. (Ret.) Charles A. Horner

Fred C. Ikle

Adm. (Ret.) David Jeremiah

Henry A. Kissinger

Adm. (Ret.) William Owens
operations.

Richard Perle

J. Danforth Quayle

Henry S. Rowen

James R. Schlesinger

Gen. (Ret.) Jack Sheehan

Kiron K. Skinner

Walter B. Slocombe

Hal Sonnenfeldt

Ruth Wedgwood

Chris Williams

Pete Wilson

James Woolsey

see: http://www.public-i.org/report.aspx?aid=90&sid=200
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. I bookmarked this DU link a while back: DLC and PNAC ties:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks MM. And let us not forget Will Marshall
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 01:02 PM by chill_wind
Quite a matrix of names here:


Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
A Complete List of PNAC Signatories and Contributing Writers




http://rightweb.irc-online.org/charts/pnac-chart.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. What are Hillary and Joe waiting for before they sign? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Paul Simon???
I saw a "Paul Simon" on the list. Is that THE Paul Simon???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It would seem so.
Along with Steven C Clemons (of the "Washington Note" oft cited here at DU ?) and any number of others who lent their name to at least one PNAC cause.




China

Hawks press Bush on Hong Kong security law
By Jim Lobe


(...)


While a strong majority of signers of the Hong Kong letter are neo-conservative or more traditional Republican right-wingers like Cheney and Rumsfeld, PNAC also recruited a number of individuals considered at the center or left of the political spectrum to sign the letter.

Among them were Robert Edgar, the head of the National Council of Churches of Christ; former Democratic congressman Sam Gejdensen, the Clinton administration's top human-rights official; Yale international-law Professor Harold Hongju Koh, former assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor; HRW founder Robert L Bernstein; former Democratic senator Paul Simon; the head of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) labor-union confederation, John Sweeney; and Harvard China expert Merle Goldman.

Goldman, who has long campaigned on behalf of human rights in China, said she signed the letter based on the statement rather than the sponsoring group. "I am very concerned about the situation in Hong Kong and agree with the statement, but I wasn't really aware of the make-up of the group," she said.




link:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/DL05Ad03.html

Right, then. Harvard China expert who knew nothing about the virulent cold-warrior anti-China politics of the PNAC right here at home.



Signatories of a letter on Hong Kong dated Nov 25, 2002
http://www.opednews.com/pnacwatch.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Wow
Will Joe follow him and officially join PNAC after leaving Congress next year? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Probably this one
He didn't seem so bad when he ran for pRes. but he is a Repub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. It was former Democratic senator Paul Simon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Thanks for the link
He was a Dem. Damn, I thought I liked him for some reason.

I don't know how any self respecting democrats could join up in signing with this gang of thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. we know all about the PNAC doctrine
but how many of our fellow citizens know or even care about it? we must educate the masses then and only then will change occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. Kick for the late crowd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. And again. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC