Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drama in the Senate: Rich Plan, Poor Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 10:56 PM
Original message
Drama in the Senate: Rich Plan, Poor Plan
The Senate is on a collision course this week between backers of a higher minimum wage and supporters of a sharply reduced estate tax. Leaders in both parties were busily taking temperatures and counting votes yesterday, saying the outcome is too close to call.

Most Democrats support the minimum-wage hike and oppose the estate tax cut. Most Republicans take the opposite stand. But their choices will not be easy because the House -- with Senate GOP leaders' blessings -- approved both proposals in one bill Saturday and then left town for the summer. The legislation will preoccupy the Senate during a hectic week that also will include action on offshore drilling, military spending and a rewrite of pension law.

The wage-tax showdown, likely to occur Friday, will boil down to this: Do enough Democrats sufficiently detest the estate tax cut -- which would benefit the wealthiest Americans -- to reject a chance to increase the federal minimum wage, which would benefit the working poor?

(snip)
Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) virulently opposes the coupling of the minimum-wage hike and the estate tax cut, which he called "a cynical, cheap political trick" in a speech yesterday. "This attempt at political blackmail is not going to work," he said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/31/AR2006073101020.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's something ironic about this. Evilly ironic.
It just MIGHT be "tax neutral." I suspect, in some secret cavern underneath a right-wing think tank, they figured out that the additional taxes that the lowest-paid workers would pay (excise, fuel, sales, FICA, etc.) would generate enough revenues to give every huge estate a tax cut.

They wouldn't want it to be known, though. After all, why ruin the myths they trot out repeatedly to oppose raising the minimum wage?

:crazy: :tinfoilhat: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Since half the kids who will pay for the tax cut are not born why worry?
And Paris Hilton will most likely hire two new people for just the number of clothing she will buy. Two, and I say two, people making more money. Voodoo Eco. at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC