Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Senate non-Democrat "Democrats" won't block Alito

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
David Van Os Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:07 AM
Original message
Why the Senate non-Democrat "Democrats" won't block Alito
So many frustrated Democrats keep asking themselves why won't the Senate Democrats show more resistance to the Bushites' continuing drive for consolidation of anti-Constitutional executive power (which has been the Bush motive all along, as clearly revealed in the FL election theft). I would like to suggest an answer. With just a very few notable exceptions, the "Democratic" Senators aren't Democrats at all. What they really are is the apologist wing of the Republican Party. Their purpose is to apologize for the anti-democratic actions of their (i.e. Repub) party's leadership.

You might also say they are the "straight men" of the Republican Party. They serve the purpose of providing the illusion that we still have the checks and balances of a two-party system. By doing so they are accomlices in the Bushite power grab. A real Democratic Party would have walked out of the Congress at the Bushites' arrogant dismissal of Constitutional government. They would have declared their refusal to participate any longer in a sham and gone back to their districts to mobilize the people against the imperial presidency. As Noam Chomsky said recently, the Bushites would be in terrible political trouble right now if the country had an opposition party.

As I opined in a previous post, George crossed the Rubicon when he declared he was going to continue wiretapping without warrants. As I expected would happen, the Senate "Democrats" meekly allowed him to march into Rome without serious opposition, and now they are about to let him place another one of his mouthpieces in the consulship to rubberstamp the power seizure.

I wish the millions of frustrated grassroots Fighting Democrats who keep expecting the Senate "Democrats" to provide opposition leadership, and who keep getting let down, would stop wasting their energies on the vain hope that the Scaredy-Cat "Democrats" will magically transform into Fighting Democrats. Those who owe their political careers to a decayed political culture will not change that culture. I wish the mass of grassroots Democrats would hunker down for the long haul of transforming our party into a real political party that can mobilize a base, instead of the brokerage agency that it is now.

There are two prongs to this work. They are of equal priority. One prong is mobilizing in election cycles to get pro-democracy Fighting Democrats elected to public office, and the other prong is placing pro-democracy Democrats in internal party positions (pct chair, county chair, executive committee positions, convention delegates, etc.) Bend your efforts to fight for these things as hard as you can. Do your part and run for something yourself, either for public office or Democratic party office. Fight 'em till hell freezes over, then fight 'em on the ice.

David Van Os
Democratic Candidate for Texas Attorney General
You can help me keep going at www.vanosfortexasag.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks, David. "Dems" fightin' words! :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well said, David......
and I agree with you 100%

If we can't make more than noise about the litany of crimes and corruption the chimp has committed, there is something really wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great Post!
Go get 'em Dave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Amen, Brother!
It's just all the damage they are doing in the meanwhile with their diebold machines and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick & Nominated - We need more people like you speaking the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely true.
Cya in April.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. David, every time I hear your opinions I like you even more
A real Democratic Party would have walked out of the Congress at the Bushites' arrogant dismissal of Constitutional government. They would have declared their refusal to participate any longer in a sham and gone back to their districts to mobilize the people against the imperial presidency.

You said a mouthful right there. Yet you're not just telling us what we want to hear, you actually have a plan to work toward change.

Keep it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-18-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why do you expect
career politicians to act like anything but career politicians. We need to go back to the days when a citizen would serve in public office for a few years as a civic service, then return to the farm, or his shop, or the factory. Whatever, back to private life to live under the laws he helped to pass. A lot of bad laws would never have been passed in Congress had not exempted themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC