Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does there have to be a voting rights act?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:32 PM
Original message
Why does there have to be a voting rights act?
And why did they vote it in for only 25 years? Why didn't they vote to say,blacks don't NEED a voting rights act,they are just like everyone else and can vote FREELY. There isn't a white voting rights act is there? It doesn't make any sense to me. Why is it that in 2006 this is still in existence? Lastly,why doesn't anyone say anything about it? Khrist....twilight zone for me AGAIN.(and the idiot in chief speaks to the NAACP today,on top of it all) What a crazy bizarre country this is. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. because they're not just like everyone else and can't always vote freely
i think the original act must have been for only 25 years because they figured it would all be fixed by now, well it isn't

anywhere the racists can get their grubby little paws on it, there are subtle and not so subtle ways to stop blacks from voting

i can name plenty from 2004 -- such things as flyers being put out that blacks trying to vote would be checked for outstanding warrants or late payments of rent, not enough voting machines going to black precincts so working black people can't vote because of the long lines, the usual nonsense

there were students at xavier in new orleans who waited 9 hrs to cast a vote in year of our lord two thousand freaking four, in my white precint i waited 30 minutes to vote

so yeah we still need a voting rights act and we need it to be more than just some nice words on paper

a twist that has arisen in the last two decades is prosecuting blacks, esp. black men more aggressively for similar crimes than whites, in that way, many blacks in many states lose their right to vote while the white person guilty of the same crime often does not

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's awful,isn't it?
It makes me wonder why some blacks vote for repukes,and why some are solid bu$h supporters.It's just plain NUTS. In 2006 color shouldn't be an issue.......but thanks to bu$h and his thugs......it is. It really pisses me off. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because it's all an act... the endless lines, the people standing
in the rain, waiting for hours, being turned away for supposed felony charges, the well hung chads, the buttons turned on that kick out the ballot on error without informing the voter, the exit polls, the paperless biased machinery.... it's all just one big act for your viewing enjoyment. Perhaps Putin could have said, "I hope it will not be a democracy of the type you have created shrub".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Our democracy no longer exists
thanks to that freakin Hitler wanna be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because without the Voting Rights Act, even more people would
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 07:55 PM by SeattleGirl
be disenfranchised, especially people of color. And no, there isn't a "white voting rights act", but whites generally have less of a problem voting than blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans, etc. It's like this: If you ain't white, you ain't right. That's the thinking of a lot of people in this country, and unfortunately right now, those kind of people are at the top of the heap (whether they actually belong there or not -- but that's another subject).

I live in a pretty racially mixed neighborhood. At the local caucus in 2004, I was at a table with several other white people, and a black couple. We were talking about our voting place, which is an apartment building for retired people on fixed incomes. The outer doors lock automatically; only the residents have key. Well, to me, it was a freakin' annoyance, but to the black couple (and I admit, I'm a bit chagrined to admit that this did not occur to me at the time), that locked door was a barrier to them voting because of their color. Just another roadblock, among the many roadblocks they had faced in their lives (this couple was retired, and had been through the Civil Rights Movement in the '60's, and had also fought tooth and nail for their right to vote).

Anyway, things like that are why we need a Voting Rights Act. Is it crazy that we still need one in 2006? Yes, it is. But even more so, it is a sad statement about this country that we still need one.

I can guarantee you, though, if the majority of blacks voted Republican, there wouldn't be the kinds of roadblocks we see right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totallybushed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are permanent and
non-permanent parts of the Voting Rights Act. The non-permanent parts single out certain states with a past history of voting discrimination for special scrutiny by the federal government to ensure that discrimination does not occur there. These provisions do not apply to the rest of the states.

It was originally passed for only 5 years because it was (and maybe still is) considered to be unconstituional to discriminate agaisnt some states. It could be passed to apply to all states,but, in the past, black leadership has been against that becasue they thought that it would dilute federal resources.

Other provisions have been added as time went on, such as requiring ballots in languages other thatn English. This was part of the fight this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's only been 40 years or so since the Voting Rights act
was put into place.....(In order to get those rights many blacks were hung, murdered in the streets, jewish boys were killed trying to help get these acts passed)

whites weren't getting their brains bashed out or attacked by the police or bitten and chewed up by dogs...(that is unless they were supporting blacks)

Now fast forward to 2000 the Republican party (made up of many of those that didn't want blacks to have voting rights in the first place) have figured out technical ways to deter not only blacks but others that don't agree with their views...

This current government has set this country back 20 years in the march for equality for all Americans...

So we will need the Voting Rights act in place to promote equality in this country.....as long as one person in this country feels intimidated, disenfranchised at the polls, threatened...we will need the voting rights act...

Anyhoo...that's my two cents..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. "There isn't a white voting rights act is there?"
Um, have you looked at who the majority is in this country - economically, politically, socially?

Why would the majority who have ALWAYS (women since 1920) enjoyed privilege based on the color of their skin NEED a voting rights act?

I'm sorry, but if you're white, you're not the victim here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Greg Palast does show that some poor whites were done out of a vote
in "Armed Madhouse".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC