Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge won't drop AT&T eavesdropping lawsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:05 PM
Original message
Judge won't drop AT&T eavesdropping lawsuit
Judge won't drop AT&T eavesdropping lawsuit
Jul 20, 3:13 PM (ET)

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A federal judge declined motions on Thursday to dismiss a lawsuit against AT&T alleging the firm illegally allowed the U.S. government to monitor phone conversations and e-mail communications.

AT&T asked the court in late April to dismiss the case, and two weeks later the U.S. government also asked the federal judge to dismiss it because of the secrecy of the issue.

In a 72-page ruling on Thursday, Judge Vaughn Walker rejected that filing in a case that has raised further attention to the domestic spying program acknowledged by President George W. Bush.

"The very subject matter of this action is hardly a secret," the judge wrote. "Public disclosures by the government and AT&T indicate that AT&T is assisting the government to implement some kind of surveillance program."


http://reuters.myway.com/article/20060720/2006-07-20T191315Z_01_N20435292_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-SECURITY-ATT-DC.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. One word:
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. is that really one word...?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's right, Originalpckelly--cue the Vonage theme!
And what's all this nonsense about the program being "too secret"? How "secret" it is has nothing to do with how legal it is--unless, of course, they KNOW it's illegal!

:woohoo:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for Judge Walker! David vs. the Goliaths!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Telecom companies complicity in eavesdropping has been on going.
Read The Puzzle Palace by Jame Bamford. They were doing this back in the 50's and have been doing it ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hoot!
This is good news. I would like to hear more details from the 72 page ruling.

Funny, I haven't heard Wolf mention this yet :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This is huge news
and not one word from Wolf...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Why doesn't this thread have 5 votes yet?
Let's put this on the greatest page! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Law of the Land still stands!
Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. For the record - RE: Judge Walker
He was appointed by Shrub's daddy. Is considered biased against environmentalists and is known to be an "independent conservative."

Any cries of "activist judges" or "damned Clinton appointees" can be refuted quite swiftly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC